Pierrick Laulan, Matthieu L G Fernandez, Emeric Abet, Jérôme Dimet, Ulrike Rimmele
{"title":"The Flush Model: A Novel Framework to Manage Surgeons' Mental Fatigue and Cognitive Load.","authors":"Pierrick Laulan, Matthieu L G Fernandez, Emeric Abet, Jérôme Dimet, Ulrike Rimmele","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental fatigue significantly impairs surgeons' cognitive performance, compromising patient safety. However, surgical practice lacks an integrated framework to understand and mitigate this cognitive strain effectively.</p><p><strong>Conceptual model: </strong>We propose adapting the Flush model, initially developed for endurance sports, to surgical settings. This model conceptualizes mental fatigue through a dynamic analogy of a water tank composed of 4 main components: perceived fatigue (ballcock), fatigue accumulation (filling rate), fatigue recovery (drain rate), and a safety margin (security reserve). We detail how intrinsic cognitive load, extraneous stressors, physiological and psychological factors, and circadian influences collectively drive mental fatigue accumulation.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The Flush model clarifies how mental fatigue fluctuates during surgical procedures and highlights practical recovery methods such as brief mindfulness interventions, microbreaks, cognitive offloading, and ergonomics adjustments. It emphasizes maintaining a cognitive safety reserve to safeguard against errors during critical surgical phases, providing surgeons with actionable strategies to manage fatigue in real time.</p><p><strong>Future directions: </strong>We recommend empirical validation through real-time monitoring using physiological measures (eg, heart-rate variability, pupillometry) coupled with subjective assessments (eg, NASA Task Load Index, Surgery Task Load Index). Integrating Flush principles into surgical training, simulation programs, and institutional policies could foster a culture prioritizing cognitive performance and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Flush model provides a comprehensive, intuitive framework for understanding and addressing surgeons' mental fatigue. Its implementation promises to enhance cognitive resilience, reduce surgical errors, and improve both patient outcomes and surgeon well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 2","pages":"e581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mental fatigue significantly impairs surgeons' cognitive performance, compromising patient safety. However, surgical practice lacks an integrated framework to understand and mitigate this cognitive strain effectively.
Conceptual model: We propose adapting the Flush model, initially developed for endurance sports, to surgical settings. This model conceptualizes mental fatigue through a dynamic analogy of a water tank composed of 4 main components: perceived fatigue (ballcock), fatigue accumulation (filling rate), fatigue recovery (drain rate), and a safety margin (security reserve). We detail how intrinsic cognitive load, extraneous stressors, physiological and psychological factors, and circadian influences collectively drive mental fatigue accumulation.
Clinical implications: The Flush model clarifies how mental fatigue fluctuates during surgical procedures and highlights practical recovery methods such as brief mindfulness interventions, microbreaks, cognitive offloading, and ergonomics adjustments. It emphasizes maintaining a cognitive safety reserve to safeguard against errors during critical surgical phases, providing surgeons with actionable strategies to manage fatigue in real time.
Future directions: We recommend empirical validation through real-time monitoring using physiological measures (eg, heart-rate variability, pupillometry) coupled with subjective assessments (eg, NASA Task Load Index, Surgery Task Load Index). Integrating Flush principles into surgical training, simulation programs, and institutional policies could foster a culture prioritizing cognitive performance and patient safety.
Conclusions: The Flush model provides a comprehensive, intuitive framework for understanding and addressing surgeons' mental fatigue. Its implementation promises to enhance cognitive resilience, reduce surgical errors, and improve both patient outcomes and surgeon well-being.