Promoting the use of research evidence from websites: optimising microsurveys as feedback loops to drive improvement.

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Nehal Eldeeb, Cheng Ren, Valerie B Shapiro
{"title":"Promoting the use of research evidence from websites: optimising microsurveys as feedback loops to drive improvement.","authors":"Nehal Eldeeb, Cheng Ren, Valerie B Shapiro","doi":"10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educators' use of research evidence (URE) from intermediary websites is not well understood. Current studies measure URE through periodic, retrospective user reports or by passively tracking website usage, neither of which adequately inform the continuous improvement efforts of intermediaries. This study examines the feasibility of microsurveys - brief, behaviour-triggered surveys embedded within websites - as a tool for assessing and informing the improvement of URE. Specifically, this article explores configurations to optimise microsurvey response rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A plug-in embedded microsurveys across web pages. Microsurveys included a five-point Likert emoticon rating scale and an open-ended follow-up. Four pilot studies tested variations in: (a) question wording, (b) time delays before triggering, (c) number of clicks, and (d) optimised conditions integrating the best configurations. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analysed differences in response rates and relationships between conditions, scores and response rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates improved by discarding low-performing (that is, low response rate) questions, selecting better time delays, and reducing the number of clicks to complete the microsurvey. Likert scale response rates increased from 4.18 per cent to 11.31 per cent under optimised conditions. Follow-up response rates remained stable, with higher engagement associated with favourable Likert scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes the potential of microsurveys for measuring URE from intermediary websites, achieving response rates understood to yield reliable estimates for informing the promotion of evidence in practice. Future research should explore additional configurations to further optimise response rate, integrate microsurveys with observational and behavioural data to assess validity, and study integrating microsurvey feedback into organisational change processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Educators' use of research evidence (URE) from intermediary websites is not well understood. Current studies measure URE through periodic, retrospective user reports or by passively tracking website usage, neither of which adequately inform the continuous improvement efforts of intermediaries. This study examines the feasibility of microsurveys - brief, behaviour-triggered surveys embedded within websites - as a tool for assessing and informing the improvement of URE. Specifically, this article explores configurations to optimise microsurvey response rates.

Methods: A plug-in embedded microsurveys across web pages. Microsurveys included a five-point Likert emoticon rating scale and an open-ended follow-up. Four pilot studies tested variations in: (a) question wording, (b) time delays before triggering, (c) number of clicks, and (d) optimised conditions integrating the best configurations. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analysed differences in response rates and relationships between conditions, scores and response rates.

Results: Response rates improved by discarding low-performing (that is, low response rate) questions, selecting better time delays, and reducing the number of clicks to complete the microsurvey. Likert scale response rates increased from 4.18 per cent to 11.31 per cent under optimised conditions. Follow-up response rates remained stable, with higher engagement associated with favourable Likert scores.

Conclusions: This study establishes the potential of microsurveys for measuring URE from intermediary websites, achieving response rates understood to yield reliable estimates for informing the promotion of evidence in practice. Future research should explore additional configurations to further optimise response rate, integrate microsurveys with observational and behavioural data to assess validity, and study integrating microsurvey feedback into organisational change processes.

促进使用来自网站的研究证据:优化微调查作为反馈循环,以推动改进。
背景:教育工作者对中介网站研究证据的使用尚不清楚。目前的研究通过定期的、回顾性的用户报告或被动地跟踪网站使用情况来衡量URE,这两种方法都不能充分地告知中介机构持续改进的努力。本研究考察了微调查的可行性——嵌入在网站内的简短的、行为触发的调查——作为评估和通知URE改进的工具。具体来说,本文探讨了优化微调查响应率的配置。方法:一个插件嵌入微调查跨网页。微观调查包括李克特表情评分量表和开放式随访。四项试点研究测试了以下方面的变化:(a)问题措辞,(b)触发前的时间延迟,(c)点击次数,以及(d)整合最佳配置的优化条件。卡方检验和逻辑回归分析了反应率的差异以及条件、得分和反应率之间的关系。结果:通过丢弃低表现(即低回复率)的问题,选择更好的时间延迟,减少完成微调查的点击次数,提高了回复率。在优化条件下,李克特量表反应率从4.18%提高到11.31%。随访回复率保持稳定,较高的参与度与有利的李克特评分相关。结论:本研究确立了微观调查测量中介网站URE的潜力,获得的回复率可以产生可靠的估计,为实践中的证据推广提供信息。未来的研究应该探索其他配置以进一步优化响应率,将微观调查与观察和行为数据相结合以评估有效性,并研究将微观调查反馈整合到组织变革过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信