Risk stratification using the SCAI SHOCK classification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahmad Jabri, Anand Maligireddy, Farhan Nasser, Sant Kumar, Srihari Naidu, Navin Kapur, Sripal Banglore, Jay Giri, Catalin Toma, Vikas Aggarwal, Herbert Aronow, Mir B Basir
{"title":"Risk stratification using the SCAI SHOCK classification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.","authors":"Ahmad Jabri, Anand Maligireddy, Farhan Nasser, Sant Kumar, Srihari Naidu, Navin Kapur, Sripal Banglore, Jay Giri, Catalin Toma, Vikas Aggarwal, Herbert Aronow, Mir B Basir","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality, with high-risk cases exhibiting significant heterogeneity in treatment and outcomes. Existing classification systems fail to differentiate PE patients requiring vasopressor support from those experiencing cardiac arrest. This study applies the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock classification to stratify high-risk PE patients and assess mortality differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2017-2020), we identified adult PE hospitalizations classified by SCAI shock stages: Stage A/B (hemodynamically stable or hypotensive without vasopressors), Stage C/D (requiring vasopressors and/or mechanical circulatory support [MCS]), and Stage E (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [OHCA]). Outcomes included mortality, treatment modality, and complications. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 853,160 PE admissions, 5770 (0.68 %) were Stage C/D and 15,825 (1.86 %) were Stage E. Mortality increased with shock severity: 2.13 % (Stage A/B), 39.90 % (Stage C/D), and 65.95 % (Stage E) (p < 0.05). Mortality was lowest with surgical thrombectomy (17.24 % Stage C/D; 48.28 % Stage E) and highest with systemic thrombolysis (42.57 % Stage C/D; 70.62 % Stage E) (p < 0.05). Adjusted odds of mortality were 13.9 (95 % CI: 11.9-16.2, p < 0.05) for Stage C/D and 54.8 (95 % CI: 49.3-61.0, p < 0.05) for Stage E.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Applying the SCAI shock classification to high-risk PE stratifies mortality risk more precisely. Patients with cardiac arrest exhibit significantly higher mortality than those requiring vasopressors alone. Future studies should explore refined risk stratification integrating hemodynamic parameters and biomarkers to optimize treatment selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.06.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality, with high-risk cases exhibiting significant heterogeneity in treatment and outcomes. Existing classification systems fail to differentiate PE patients requiring vasopressor support from those experiencing cardiac arrest. This study applies the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock classification to stratify high-risk PE patients and assess mortality differences.

Methods: Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2017-2020), we identified adult PE hospitalizations classified by SCAI shock stages: Stage A/B (hemodynamically stable or hypotensive without vasopressors), Stage C/D (requiring vasopressors and/or mechanical circulatory support [MCS]), and Stage E (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [OHCA]). Outcomes included mortality, treatment modality, and complications. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders.

Results: Among 853,160 PE admissions, 5770 (0.68 %) were Stage C/D and 15,825 (1.86 %) were Stage E. Mortality increased with shock severity: 2.13 % (Stage A/B), 39.90 % (Stage C/D), and 65.95 % (Stage E) (p < 0.05). Mortality was lowest with surgical thrombectomy (17.24 % Stage C/D; 48.28 % Stage E) and highest with systemic thrombolysis (42.57 % Stage C/D; 70.62 % Stage E) (p < 0.05). Adjusted odds of mortality were 13.9 (95 % CI: 11.9-16.2, p < 0.05) for Stage C/D and 54.8 (95 % CI: 49.3-61.0, p < 0.05) for Stage E.

Conclusion: Applying the SCAI shock classification to high-risk PE stratifies mortality risk more precisely. Patients with cardiac arrest exhibit significantly higher mortality than those requiring vasopressors alone. Future studies should explore refined risk stratification integrating hemodynamic parameters and biomarkers to optimize treatment selection.

急性肺栓塞患者SCAI休克分级的危险分层。
背景:肺栓塞(PE)是导致心血管疾病死亡的主要原因,高危病例在治疗和预后方面表现出显著的异质性。现有的分类系统无法区分需要血管加压剂支持的PE患者和经历心脏骤停的PE患者。本研究应用心血管血管造影与干预学会(SCAI)休克分类对高危PE患者进行分层并评估死亡率差异。方法:利用全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库(2017-2020),我们确定了按SCAI休克分期分类的成人PE住院:A/B期(血流动力学稳定或低血压,无血管加压药物),C/D期(需要血管加压药物和/或机械循环支持[MCS])和E期(院外心脏骤停[OHCA])。结果包括死亡率、治疗方式和并发症。采用多元逻辑回归模型对混杂因素进行校正。结果:在853,160例PE入院患者中,5770例(0.68%)为C/D期,15825例(1.86%)为E期,死亡率随休克严重程度的增加而增加:2.13% (A/B期),39.90% (C/D期)和65.95% (E期)。心脏骤停患者的死亡率明显高于单独使用血管加压药物的患者。未来的研究应探索结合血流动力学参数和生物标志物的精细风险分层,以优化治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信