Time-to-Treatment Initiation and Its Effect on All-Cause Mortality: Insights From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
World Journal of Oncology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-14 DOI:10.14740/wjon2584
Song Peng Ang, Eunseuk Lee, Jia Ee Chia, Maya Iglesias, Mariela Di Vanna, Shreya Shambhavi, Jose Iglesias
{"title":"Time-to-Treatment Initiation and Its Effect on All-Cause Mortality: Insights From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.","authors":"Song Peng Ang, Eunseuk Lee, Jia Ee Chia, Maya Iglesias, Mariela Di Vanna, Shreya Shambhavi, Jose Iglesias","doi":"10.14740/wjon2584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in cancer treatment initiation can significantly impact survival outcomes, but the magnitude of this effect varies by cancer type, stage, and patient demographics. This study examined the association between time-to-treatment initiation (TTI) and all-cause mortality across multiple common cancers, evaluating differential impacts and sociodemographic disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, including 991,771 adults diagnosed with breast, lung, prostate, or colorectal cancers between 2015 and 2020. TTI intervals were divided into four categories: 0 - 1, 2 - 5, 6 - 9, and ≥ 10 months. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, cancer-specific, and treatment factors, assessed the impact of TTI on all-cause mortality, accounting for time-varying covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 63.9% of patients initiated treatment within 1 month. Unadjusted analyses revealed paradoxically lower mortality with longer TTI intervals (26.1% for 0 - 1 month vs. 11.4% for ≥ 10 months). After adjusting for time-varying effects, longer TTI significantly correlated with higher mortality risks (hazard ratio (HR): 1.02 for 2 - 5 months, 1.08 for 6 - 9 months, 1.23 for ≥ 10 months; P < 0.001 each), compared to treatment within 1 month. Older age (HR: 1.06), male gender (HR: 1.08), unmarried status (HR: 1.06), and non-Hispanic Black race (HR: 1.03) were independently associated with increased mortality. Lung cancer patients had significantly higher mortality than breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers (all P < 0.001). Treatment differences emerged, with reduced chemotherapy (40.2% to 10.0%) and surgical interventions (70.6% to 48.8%) at longer intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis showed that increased TTI is independently associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality across major cancers, emphasizing the urgency of timely treatment initiation. Sociodemographic disparities in TTI and outcomes highlight systemic barriers disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations, necessitating targeted interventions to improve equitable cancer care and survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46797,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Oncology","volume":"16 3","pages":"286-294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon2584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delays in cancer treatment initiation can significantly impact survival outcomes, but the magnitude of this effect varies by cancer type, stage, and patient demographics. This study examined the association between time-to-treatment initiation (TTI) and all-cause mortality across multiple common cancers, evaluating differential impacts and sociodemographic disparities.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, including 991,771 adults diagnosed with breast, lung, prostate, or colorectal cancers between 2015 and 2020. TTI intervals were divided into four categories: 0 - 1, 2 - 5, 6 - 9, and ≥ 10 months. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, cancer-specific, and treatment factors, assessed the impact of TTI on all-cause mortality, accounting for time-varying covariates.

Results: Overall, 63.9% of patients initiated treatment within 1 month. Unadjusted analyses revealed paradoxically lower mortality with longer TTI intervals (26.1% for 0 - 1 month vs. 11.4% for ≥ 10 months). After adjusting for time-varying effects, longer TTI significantly correlated with higher mortality risks (hazard ratio (HR): 1.02 for 2 - 5 months, 1.08 for 6 - 9 months, 1.23 for ≥ 10 months; P < 0.001 each), compared to treatment within 1 month. Older age (HR: 1.06), male gender (HR: 1.08), unmarried status (HR: 1.06), and non-Hispanic Black race (HR: 1.03) were independently associated with increased mortality. Lung cancer patients had significantly higher mortality than breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers (all P < 0.001). Treatment differences emerged, with reduced chemotherapy (40.2% to 10.0%) and surgical interventions (70.6% to 48.8%) at longer intervals.

Conclusion: Our analysis showed that increased TTI is independently associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality across major cancers, emphasizing the urgency of timely treatment initiation. Sociodemographic disparities in TTI and outcomes highlight systemic barriers disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations, necessitating targeted interventions to improve equitable cancer care and survival outcomes.

开始治疗的时间及其对全因死亡率的影响:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的见解。
背景:癌症治疗开始的延迟会显著影响生存结果,但这种影响的程度因癌症类型、分期和患者人口统计学而异。本研究考察了多种常见癌症的开始治疗时间(TTI)与全因死亡率之间的关系,评估了不同的影响和社会人口统计学差异。方法:使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库进行回顾性队列分析,包括2015年至2020年间诊断为乳腺癌、肺癌、前列腺癌或结直肠癌的991,771名成年人。TTI间隔分为4类:0 - 1个月、2 - 5个月、6 - 9个月和≥10个月。Cox比例风险模型,调整了人口统计学、社会经济、癌症特异性和治疗因素,评估了TTI对全因死亡率的影响,并考虑了时变协变量。结果:总体而言,63.9%的患者在1个月内开始治疗。未经调整的分析显示,TTI间隔时间越长,死亡率越低(0 - 1个月26.1%,≥10个月11.4%)。在调整时变效应后,较长的TTI与较高的死亡风险显著相关(风险比(HR): 2 - 5个月1.02,6 - 9个月1.08,≥10个月1.23;P < 0.001),与1个月内的治疗相比。年龄较大(HR: 1.06)、男性(HR: 1.08)、未婚状态(HR: 1.06)和非西班牙裔黑人种族(HR: 1.03)与死亡率增加独立相关。肺癌患者的死亡率明显高于乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌(均P < 0.001)。治疗差异出现,化疗减少(40.2%至10.0%),手术干预(70.6%至48.8%)间隔较长。结论:我们的分析显示,TTI升高与主要癌症的全因死亡率显著升高独立相关,强调了及时开始治疗的紧迫性。TTI和预后的社会人口差异突出了影响弱势人群的系统性障碍,需要有针对性的干预措施来改善公平的癌症治疗和生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: World Journal of Oncology, bimonthly, publishes original contributions describing basic research and clinical investigation of cancer, on the cellular, molecular, prevention, diagnosis, therapy and prognosis aspects. The submissions can be basic research or clinical investigation oriented. This journal welcomes those submissions focused on the clinical trials of new treatment modalities for cancer, and those submissions focused on molecular or cellular research of the oncology pathogenesis. Case reports submitted for consideration of publication should explore either a novel genomic event/description or a new safety signal from an oncolytic agent. The areas of interested manuscripts are these disciplines: tumor immunology and immunotherapy; cancer molecular pharmacology and chemotherapy; drug sensitivity and resistance; cancer epidemiology; clinical trials; cancer pathology; radiobiology and radiation oncology; solid tumor oncology; hematological malignancies; surgical oncology; pediatric oncology; molecular oncology and cancer genes; gene therapy; cancer endocrinology; cancer metastasis; prevention and diagnosis of cancer; other cancer related subjects. The types of manuscripts accepted are original article, review, editorial, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, book review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信