Evaluating the Impact of Community-Based Medical Education on Health Literacy and Patient Empowerment in Underserved Populations: A Pilot Cohort Study.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aida Aljafri, Persia Abba, Anita Sedghi, Andreas Conte, Waseem Jerjes
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Community-Based Medical Education on Health Literacy and Patient Empowerment in Underserved Populations: A Pilot Cohort Study.","authors":"Aida Aljafri, Persia Abba, Anita Sedghi, Andreas Conte, Waseem Jerjes","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15060097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Traditionally, community-based education (CBE) programmes have been utilised for teaching medical students clinical and interpersonal skills through placement in underserved environments. This pilot cohort study tested an extended model of CBE by infusing patient education into student-conducted consultations with the dual objectives of stimulating improved learning for the students and improved health literacy for the patients. <b>Methods:</b> The intervention involved 38 final-year medical students and 85 adult patients and from underprivileged communities in North West London. The students first undertook online preparatory workshops on health literacy, communication skills, and cultural competence. Subsequently, they imparted 20-30 min educational sessions on chronic disease management and preventive care to the patients on their clinical placements. The quantitative measurement used pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, and the qualitative measurement was based on reflective diaries and patient feedback. Paired <i>t</i>-tests were used for statistical comparisons, while a thematic analysis was used for textual answers. <b>Results:</b> Student confidence in breaking down medical jargon improved from 2.8 ± 0.7 to 4.4 ± 0.5 (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and confidence in making use of visual aids improved from 2.5 ± 0.8 to 4.2 ± 0.6 (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Understanding among the patients of their health conditions improved from 27% to 74% (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and self-confidence in their ability to manage their health improved from 31% to 79% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The qualitative feedback noted improved empathy, cultural sensitivity, and a positive effect on patient empowerment through tailored education. <b>Conclusions:</b> This CBE intervention had two benefits: improving teaching and communication skills in students and greatly enhancing health literacy in underserved patients. The integration of structured education into usual care encounters holds the promise of a scalable, sustainable method for addressing health disparities. Longer longitudinal studies are necessary to assess its long-term success and incorporation into medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15060097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, community-based education (CBE) programmes have been utilised for teaching medical students clinical and interpersonal skills through placement in underserved environments. This pilot cohort study tested an extended model of CBE by infusing patient education into student-conducted consultations with the dual objectives of stimulating improved learning for the students and improved health literacy for the patients. Methods: The intervention involved 38 final-year medical students and 85 adult patients and from underprivileged communities in North West London. The students first undertook online preparatory workshops on health literacy, communication skills, and cultural competence. Subsequently, they imparted 20-30 min educational sessions on chronic disease management and preventive care to the patients on their clinical placements. The quantitative measurement used pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, and the qualitative measurement was based on reflective diaries and patient feedback. Paired t-tests were used for statistical comparisons, while a thematic analysis was used for textual answers. Results: Student confidence in breaking down medical jargon improved from 2.8 ± 0.7 to 4.4 ± 0.5 (p < 0.01), and confidence in making use of visual aids improved from 2.5 ± 0.8 to 4.2 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01). Understanding among the patients of their health conditions improved from 27% to 74% (p < 0.001), and self-confidence in their ability to manage their health improved from 31% to 79% (p < 0.001). The qualitative feedback noted improved empathy, cultural sensitivity, and a positive effect on patient empowerment through tailored education. Conclusions: This CBE intervention had two benefits: improving teaching and communication skills in students and greatly enhancing health literacy in underserved patients. The integration of structured education into usual care encounters holds the promise of a scalable, sustainable method for addressing health disparities. Longer longitudinal studies are necessary to assess its long-term success and incorporation into medical education.

评估社区医学教育对服务不足人群健康素养和患者赋权的影响:一项试点队列研究。
背景:传统上,以社区为基础的教育(CBE)方案通过在服务不足的环境中安置来教授医学生临床和人际交往技能。本试点队列研究通过在学生进行的咨询中注入患者教育来测试CBE的扩展模型,其双重目标是促进学生改善学习并提高患者的健康素养。方法:对来自伦敦西北部贫困社区的38名医学生和85名成年患者进行干预。学生们首先进行了关于健康知识、沟通技巧和文化能力的在线预备讲习班。随后,他们对临床实习的患者进行了20-30分钟的慢性病管理和预防保健教育。定量测量采用干预前和干预后问卷,定性测量采用反思日记和患者反馈。配对t检验用于统计比较,而主题分析用于文本答案。结果:学生对医学术语分解的信心由2.8±0.7提高到4.4±0.5 (p < 0.01),对使用教具的信心由2.5±0.8提高到4.2±0.6 (p < 0.01)。患者对自己健康状况的了解从27%提高到74% (p < 0.001),对自己管理健康能力的自信从31%提高到79% (p < 0.001)。定性反馈指出,通过量身定制的教育,移情能力、文化敏感性和对患者赋权的积极影响得到了提高。结论:CBE干预有两个好处:提高学生的教学和沟通技巧,大大提高服务不足患者的健康素养。将结构化教育与常规护理结合起来,有望为解决健康差距提供一种可扩展、可持续的方法。有必要进行更长时间的纵向研究,以评估其长期成功和纳入医学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信