Comparison of 20% Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Conventional Treatment in Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Patients.

Q3 Medicine
Shubhi Sachan, Kshama Dwivedi, Satya Prakash Singh, Santosh Kumar, Vinod Kumar Singh
{"title":"Comparison of 20% Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Conventional Treatment in Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Patients.","authors":"Shubhi Sachan, Kshama Dwivedi, Satya Prakash Singh, Santosh Kumar, Vinod Kumar Singh","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.47717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional therapy and 20% autologous platelet-rich plasma (aPRP) eye drops for moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective interventional study, 40 individuals (80 eyes) with moderate to severe DED were analyzed. Twenty patients each were randomly assigned to the study and control groups. The study group was given 20% aPRP eye drops; the control group was given artificial tears as per conventional treatment. Comprehensive eye examinations including evaluation of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), tear meniscus height, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, corneal fluorescein staining, conjunctival impression cytology, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) were conducted in both groups for 3 months. Pre- and posttreatment results were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of patients in the study group was 51±14 years (range, 37-65 years), whereas that of the control group was 50±17 years (range, 33-67 years). After 3 months, there was a more significant decrease in OSDI score in the study group than in the control group (p<0.01). The BCVA data demonstrated no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Measurements of tear meniscus height, Schirmer's value, and TBUT at 3 months showed statistically significant differences (p<0.01). The posttreatment improvements in fluorescein staining and impression cytology scores in the study group were markedly superior to those in the control group (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>aPRP is both safe and more effective than conventional treatments for moderate to severe symptomatic DED.</p>","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"55 3","pages":"112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.47717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional therapy and 20% autologous platelet-rich plasma (aPRP) eye drops for moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED).

Materials and methods: In this prospective interventional study, 40 individuals (80 eyes) with moderate to severe DED were analyzed. Twenty patients each were randomly assigned to the study and control groups. The study group was given 20% aPRP eye drops; the control group was given artificial tears as per conventional treatment. Comprehensive eye examinations including evaluation of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), tear meniscus height, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, corneal fluorescein staining, conjunctival impression cytology, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) were conducted in both groups for 3 months. Pre- and posttreatment results were compared.

Results: The average age of patients in the study group was 51±14 years (range, 37-65 years), whereas that of the control group was 50±17 years (range, 33-67 years). After 3 months, there was a more significant decrease in OSDI score in the study group than in the control group (p<0.01). The BCVA data demonstrated no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Measurements of tear meniscus height, Schirmer's value, and TBUT at 3 months showed statistically significant differences (p<0.01). The posttreatment improvements in fluorescein staining and impression cytology scores in the study group were markedly superior to those in the control group (p<0.01).

Conclusion: aPRP is both safe and more effective than conventional treatments for moderate to severe symptomatic DED.

20%自体富血小板血浆治疗中重度干眼症与常规治疗的比较
目的:评价常规治疗联合20%自体富血小板血浆(aPRP)滴眼液治疗中重度干眼病(DED)的疗效。材料和方法:本前瞻性介入研究分析了40例(80只眼)中重度DED患者。各有20名患者被随机分配到研究组和对照组。实验组给予20% aPRP滴眼液;对照组患者在常规治疗的基础上给予人工泪液。两组随访3个月,进行最佳矫正视力评估(BCVA)、泪液半月板高度、泪液破裂时间(TBUT)、Schirmer试验、角膜荧光素染色、结膜印象细胞学、眼表疾病指数(OSDI)等眼部综合检查。比较前后处理结果。结果:研究组患者平均年龄51±14岁(范围37 ~ 65岁),对照组患者平均年龄50±17岁(范围33 ~ 67岁)。3个月后,研究组OSDI评分较对照组下降更显著(p0.05)。3个月时撕裂半月板高度、Schirmer值、TBUT测量差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:aPRP治疗中重度症状性DED比常规治疗更安全、更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信