Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Primary, Adjunctive, and Substitutive Therapy.

Q3 Medicine
David Oliver-Gutierrez, Osvaldo Guevara-Chavarría, Shirin Djavanmardi, Gloria Segura-Duch, Marta Castany, Stefania Piludu, Carlos A Arciniegas-Perasso, Elena Ávila, Elena Milla, Susana Duch
{"title":"Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Primary, Adjunctive, and Substitutive Therapy.","authors":"David Oliver-Gutierrez, Osvaldo Guevara-Chavarría, Shirin Djavanmardi, Gloria Segura-Duch, Marta Castany, Stefania Piludu, Carlos A Arciniegas-Perasso, Elena Ávila, Elena Milla, Susana Duch","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.75570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess real-world outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in naive patients compared to SLT as adjunctive treatment (AT), investigating SLT's intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and its potential to decrease topical medication.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing SLT with no prior glaucoma surgery or laser treatment were grouped based on the intended objective: SLT as primary treatment (PT), SLT as AT, and SLT as substitutive treatment (ST). Survival in the PT and AT groups was defined as ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline and IOP ≤21 on two consecutive visits with the same or fewer medications and no additional glaucoma procedure, including repeat SLT. Survival in the ST group was defined as decreasing topical medication while maintaining or reducing IOP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 120 eyes of 120 patients with a mean follow-up of 32.7 months. The PT group showed superior IOP reduction than the AT group at 24-36 months (22.1% vs. 14.5%, p=0.039). Non-responders comprised 28.6% of the PT group and 37.0% of the AT group. The PT group demonstrated better survival rates than the AT group at 12, 24, and 36 months (69.0% vs. 47.1%, 38.8% vs. 31.4%, and 31.1% vs. 23.5%, respectively). In the ST group, 34.2% of patients were successful at 12 months, increasing to 38.3% at 24 months. At 24 months, 50.0% of patients had reduced at least one medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLT showed two-thirds effectiveness, with one-third being non-responders. It was more effective as PT, with higher IOP reduction and success rates. SLT reduced topical medication in half of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"55 3","pages":"132-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.75570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess real-world outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in naive patients compared to SLT as adjunctive treatment (AT), investigating SLT's intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and its potential to decrease topical medication.

Materials and methods: Patients undergoing SLT with no prior glaucoma surgery or laser treatment were grouped based on the intended objective: SLT as primary treatment (PT), SLT as AT, and SLT as substitutive treatment (ST). Survival in the PT and AT groups was defined as ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline and IOP ≤21 on two consecutive visits with the same or fewer medications and no additional glaucoma procedure, including repeat SLT. Survival in the ST group was defined as decreasing topical medication while maintaining or reducing IOP.

Results: The study included 120 eyes of 120 patients with a mean follow-up of 32.7 months. The PT group showed superior IOP reduction than the AT group at 24-36 months (22.1% vs. 14.5%, p=0.039). Non-responders comprised 28.6% of the PT group and 37.0% of the AT group. The PT group demonstrated better survival rates than the AT group at 12, 24, and 36 months (69.0% vs. 47.1%, 38.8% vs. 31.4%, and 31.1% vs. 23.5%, respectively). In the ST group, 34.2% of patients were successful at 12 months, increasing to 38.3% at 24 months. At 24 months, 50.0% of patients had reduced at least one medication.

Conclusion: SLT showed two-thirds effectiveness, with one-third being non-responders. It was more effective as PT, with higher IOP reduction and success rates. SLT reduced topical medication in half of patients.

选择性激光小梁成形术作为主要、辅助和替代治疗的现实有效性和安全性。
目的:评估选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)与SLT作为辅助治疗(AT)在新手患者中的实际结果,研究SLT降低眼压(IOP)及其减少局部用药的潜力。材料和方法:没有青光眼手术或激光治疗的SLT患者根据预期目标进行分组:SLT作为主要治疗(PT), SLT作为AT, SLT作为替代治疗(ST)。PT组和AT组的生存率定义为:使用相同或更少的药物连续两次就诊,IOP较基线降低≥20%,IOP≤21,且没有额外的青光眼手术,包括重复SLT。ST组的生存定义为在维持或降低IOP的同时减少局部用药。结果:纳入120例患者120只眼,平均随访32.7个月。PT组在24-36个月时IOP降低优于AT组(22.1%比14.5%,p=0.039)。无应答者分别占PT组的28.6%和AT组的37.0%。PT组在12、24和36个月的生存率优于AT组(分别为69.0% vs. 47.1%, 38.8% vs. 31.4%, 31.1% vs. 23.5%)。在ST组中,34.2%的患者在12个月时成功,在24个月时增加到38.3%。在24个月时,50.0%的患者至少减少了一种药物。结论:SLT有效率为三分之二,无反应者占三分之一。作为PT更有效,IOP降低率和成功率更高。SLT减少了一半患者的局部用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信