The Use of the Shock Index to Classify Patients During Mass-Casualty Incident Triage.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
David Jerome, David W Savage, Matthew Pietrosanu
{"title":"The Use of the Shock Index to Classify Patients During Mass-Casualty Incident Triage.","authors":"David Jerome, David W Savage, Matthew Pietrosanu","doi":"10.1017/S1049023X25101209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>During mass-casualty incidents (MCIs), prehospital triage is performed to identify which patients most urgently need medical care. Formal MCI triage tools exist, but their performance is variable. The Shock Index (SI; heart rate [HR] divided by systolic blood pressure [SBP]) has previously been shown to be an efficient screening tool for identifying critically ill patients in a variety of in-hospital contexts. The primary objective of this study was to assess the ability of the SI to identify trauma patients requiring urgent life-saving interventions in the prehospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data captured in the Alberta Trauma Registry (ATR) were used to determine the SI and the \"true\" triage category of each patient using previously published reference standard definitions. The ATR is a provincial trauma registry that captures clinical records of eligible patients in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome was the sensitivity of SI to identify patients classified as \"Priority 1 (Immediate),\" meaning they received urgent life-saving interventions as defined by published consensus-based criteria. Specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated as secondary outcomes. These outcomes were compared to the performance of existing formal MCI triage tools referencing performance characteristics reported in a previously published study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 9,448 records that were extracted from the ATR, a total of 8,650 were included in the analysis. The SI threshold maximizing Youden's index was 0.72. At this threshold, SI had a sensitivity of 0.53 for identifying \"Priority 1\" patients. At a threshold of 1.00, SI had a sensitivity of 0.19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SI has a relatively low sensitivity and did not out-perform existing MCI triage tools at identifying trauma patients who met the definition of \"Priority 1\" patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20400,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X25101209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: During mass-casualty incidents (MCIs), prehospital triage is performed to identify which patients most urgently need medical care. Formal MCI triage tools exist, but their performance is variable. The Shock Index (SI; heart rate [HR] divided by systolic blood pressure [SBP]) has previously been shown to be an efficient screening tool for identifying critically ill patients in a variety of in-hospital contexts. The primary objective of this study was to assess the ability of the SI to identify trauma patients requiring urgent life-saving interventions in the prehospital setting.

Methods: Clinical data captured in the Alberta Trauma Registry (ATR) were used to determine the SI and the "true" triage category of each patient using previously published reference standard definitions. The ATR is a provincial trauma registry that captures clinical records of eligible patients in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome was the sensitivity of SI to identify patients classified as "Priority 1 (Immediate)," meaning they received urgent life-saving interventions as defined by published consensus-based criteria. Specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated as secondary outcomes. These outcomes were compared to the performance of existing formal MCI triage tools referencing performance characteristics reported in a previously published study.

Results: Of the 9,448 records that were extracted from the ATR, a total of 8,650 were included in the analysis. The SI threshold maximizing Youden's index was 0.72. At this threshold, SI had a sensitivity of 0.53 for identifying "Priority 1" patients. At a threshold of 1.00, SI had a sensitivity of 0.19.

Conclusions: The SI has a relatively low sensitivity and did not out-perform existing MCI triage tools at identifying trauma patients who met the definition of "Priority 1" patients.

休克指数在重大伤情分诊中的应用
目的:在大规模伤亡事件(MCIs)中,进行院前分诊以确定哪些患者最迫切需要医疗护理。正式的MCI分类工具是存在的,但是它们的性能是可变的。冲击指数(SI;心率[HR]除以收缩压[SBP])先前已被证明是一种有效的筛查工具,用于识别各种住院情况下的危重患者。本研究的主要目的是评估SI在院前环境中识别需要紧急救生干预的创伤患者的能力。方法:使用阿尔伯塔创伤登记处(ATR)的临床数据,根据先前公布的参考标准定义,确定每位患者的SI和“真实”分诊类别。ATR是一个省级创伤登记处,记录了加拿大阿尔伯塔省符合条件的患者的临床记录。主要结果是SI识别被分类为“优先1(立即)”的患者的敏感性,这意味着他们接受了根据公布的基于共识的标准定义的紧急救生干预。计算特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)作为次要结局。这些结果与现有的正式MCI分类工具的性能进行了比较,参考了先前发表的研究中报告的性能特征。结果:从ATR中提取的9448条记录中,共有8650条被纳入分析。最大化约登指数的SI阈值为0.72。在这个阈值下,SI识别“优先级1”患者的敏感性为0.53。当阈值为1.00时,SI的敏感性为0.19。结论:SI具有相对较低的敏感性,并且在识别符合“1级优先”患者定义的创伤患者方面并不优于现有的MCI分诊工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (PDM) is an official publication of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Currently in its 25th volume, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine is one of the leading scientific journals focusing on prehospital and disaster health. It is the only peer-reviewed international journal in its field, published bi-monthly, providing a readable, usable worldwide source of research and analysis. PDM is currently distributed in more than 55 countries. Its readership includes physicians, professors, EMTs and paramedics, nurses, emergency managers, disaster planners, hospital administrators, sociologists, and psychologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信