{"title":"Individual- and Facility-Level Factors Related to Quality-of-Life Transitions in Older Adults in Residential Facilities: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Arisa Kawashima, Xueying Jin, Ayane Komatsu, Sakino Niwa, Hiroyuki Shimada, Hidenori Arai, Tami Saito","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To elucidate factors related to the transitions of quality of life (QoL) and well-being in older adults living in residential facilities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We undertook a systematic review and narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The participants were individuals >60 years of age living in various types of residential facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a search in PubMed and Embase (Ovid) using free-text words and Medical Subject Heading terms on December 1, 2024. We included longitudinal studies published after 2000 that quantitatively assessed QoL and/or well-being at ≥2 time points. Studies published before 2000, non-English-language papers, and interventional or qualitative studies were excluded. The title, abstract, and full-text assessments were performed by multiple independent reviewers based on eligibility criteria. The Study Quality Assessment Tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies was used to assess methodologic quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7705 papers initially identified, 18 studies involving 122,057 participants were included. These studies, predominantly multicenter studies and studies conducted in the United States, revealed that QoL and well-being tended to decline gradually after admission. Key factors associated with maintaining and enhancing QoL and well-being included facility-level factors (eg, age-friendly architectural environments, social support and activities) and individual aspects (eg, cognitive function, activities of daily living, urinary continence). The variation in outcome measures precluded a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>We identified both facility- and individual-level factors associated with changes related to QoL and well-being in older adults living in residential facilities. The importance of modifiable facility-level factors should be reconsidered in ensuring quality care for older residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105721"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To elucidate factors related to the transitions of quality of life (QoL) and well-being in older adults living in residential facilities.
Design: We undertook a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Setting and participants: The participants were individuals >60 years of age living in various types of residential facilities.
Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed and Embase (Ovid) using free-text words and Medical Subject Heading terms on December 1, 2024. We included longitudinal studies published after 2000 that quantitatively assessed QoL and/or well-being at ≥2 time points. Studies published before 2000, non-English-language papers, and interventional or qualitative studies were excluded. The title, abstract, and full-text assessments were performed by multiple independent reviewers based on eligibility criteria. The Study Quality Assessment Tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies was used to assess methodologic quality.
Results: Of the 7705 papers initially identified, 18 studies involving 122,057 participants were included. These studies, predominantly multicenter studies and studies conducted in the United States, revealed that QoL and well-being tended to decline gradually after admission. Key factors associated with maintaining and enhancing QoL and well-being included facility-level factors (eg, age-friendly architectural environments, social support and activities) and individual aspects (eg, cognitive function, activities of daily living, urinary continence). The variation in outcome measures precluded a meta-analysis.
Conclusions and implications: We identified both facility- and individual-level factors associated with changes related to QoL and well-being in older adults living in residential facilities. The importance of modifiable facility-level factors should be reconsidered in ensuring quality care for older residents.
期刊介绍：
JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates.
The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
