Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI Using the #Enzian Classification in Endometriosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ala Aiob, Dina Gumin, Amirit Luder Stinski, Lior Lowenstein, Avishalom Sharon
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI Using the #Enzian Classification in Endometriosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ala Aiob, Dina Gumin, Amirit Luder Stinski, Lior Lowenstein, Avishalom Sharon","doi":"10.1159/000547069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpreted using the #Enzian classification system by comparing MRI findings with laparoscopic outcomes in women suspected of having endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Participants and setting: </strong>Twenty-four women aged 19 to 49 who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis at Galilee Medical Center from 2016 to 2023 had preoperative pelvic MRI available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI and laparoscopic findings were classified using the #Enzian classification across 64 anatomical compartments. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated for lesion location and size. Associations between MRI accuracy and patient characteristics were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI accurately identified the lesion location in 31.3% of compartments and lesion size in 20.3%. The highest accuracy was found in the tubo-ovarian region (60%), rectovaginal septum (42.9%), and ovaries (41.7%), while the lowest accuracy was observed in the parametrium (7.1%) and compartments C, F, FA, and FB (0%). Higher age, parity, and gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly associated with improved MRI accuracy (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The small sample size, retrospective design, and MRI scans from various centers with differing imaging quality and radiologist expertise may restrict generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI utilizing the #Enzian classification offers a structured method for evaluating deep infiltrating endometriosis, but it demonstrates limited accuracy for superficial or parametrial disease. While it is useful for surgical planning, MRI cannot substitute for laparoscopy, which remains crucial for a thorough evaluation and treatment of endometriosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpreted using the #Enzian classification system by comparing MRI findings with laparoscopic outcomes in women suspected of having endometriosis.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Participants and setting: Twenty-four women aged 19 to 49 who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis at Galilee Medical Center from 2016 to 2023 had preoperative pelvic MRI available.

Methods: MRI and laparoscopic findings were classified using the #Enzian classification across 64 anatomical compartments. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated for lesion location and size. Associations between MRI accuracy and patient characteristics were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.

Results: MRI accurately identified the lesion location in 31.3% of compartments and lesion size in 20.3%. The highest accuracy was found in the tubo-ovarian region (60%), rectovaginal septum (42.9%), and ovaries (41.7%), while the lowest accuracy was observed in the parametrium (7.1%) and compartments C, F, FA, and FB (0%). Higher age, parity, and gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly associated with improved MRI accuracy (p < 0.05).

Limitations: The small sample size, retrospective design, and MRI scans from various centers with differing imaging quality and radiologist expertise may restrict generalizability.

Conclusions: MRI utilizing the #Enzian classification offers a structured method for evaluating deep infiltrating endometriosis, but it demonstrates limited accuracy for superficial or parametrial disease. While it is useful for surgical planning, MRI cannot substitute for laparoscopy, which remains crucial for a thorough evaluation and treatment of endometriosis.

使用#Enzian分类诊断子宫内膜异位症的MRI准确性:单中心回顾性队列研究
目的:通过比较MRI结果和腹腔镜检查结果,评估使用#Enzian分类系统解释的盆腔磁共振成像(MRI)诊断子宫内膜异位症的准确性。设计:回顾性观察性研究。参与者和环境:2016年至2023年在加利利医疗中心接受腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症手术的24名19至49岁的女性术前进行了骨盆MRI检查。方法:采用64个解剖室的#Enzian分类对MRI和腹腔镜检查结果进行分类。诊断的准确性评估病变的位置和大小。使用适当的统计检验分析MRI准确性与患者特征之间的关系。结果:MRI准确识别病变部位的间隔率为31.3%,病变大小的间隔率为20.3%。准确率最高的是输卵管卵巢区(60%)、直肠阴道间隔(42.9%)和卵巢(41.7%),而准确率最低的是参数区(7.1%)和C、F、FA和FB区(0%)。年龄、胎次和胃肠道症状与MRI准确性的提高显著相关(p < 0.05)。局限性:小样本量,回顾性设计,来自不同中心的不同成像质量和放射科医生专业知识的MRI扫描可能会限制通用性。结论:利用#Enzian分类的MRI为评估深度浸润性子宫内膜异位症提供了一种结构化的方法,但对浅表或参数性疾病的准确性有限。虽然MRI对手术计划有用,但它不能代替腹腔镜检查,腹腔镜检查对于子宫内膜异位症的全面评估和治疗仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信