Communication, Coordination, and Security for People With Multiple Sclerosis (COCOS-MS): A Randomized, Phase II Trial of Cross-sectoral Care and Case Management.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Heidrun Golla, Veronika Dunkl, Anne Dorr, Yasemin Goereci, Fabian Hebben, Wiebke Müller, Kim Dillen, Daniele Civello, Dirk Müller, Alexander Stahmann, Raymond Voltz, Peter Löcherbach, Gereon Rudolf Fink, Martin Hellmich, Clemens Warnke
{"title":"Communication, Coordination, and Security for People With Multiple Sclerosis (COCOS-MS): A Randomized, Phase II Trial of Cross-sectoral Care and Case Management.","authors":"Heidrun Golla, Veronika Dunkl, Anne Dorr, Yasemin Goereci, Fabian Hebben, Wiebke Müller, Kim Dillen, Daniele Civello, Dirk Müller, Alexander Stahmann, Raymond Voltz, Peter Löcherbach, Gereon Rudolf Fink, Martin Hellmich, Clemens Warnke","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with severe multiple sclerosis (PsMS) have multidimensional, complex needs. COCOS-MS is an exploratory study of the effect of cross-sectoral care and case management (CCM) on these patients' quality of life, palliative care needs, and psychological distress, as well as caregivers' burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized, controlled, phase II trial (DRKS00022771) with two parallel treatment arms: standard care versus CCM in addition to standard care over a 12-month period. A trial-specific CCM manual was used. The target variables were recorded in standardized fashion at baseline (T0) and every three months thereafter (T1 until the end of the intervention at T4, then T5 three months after the end of the intervention to determine sustainability). The primary endpoint was the change in the patients' quality of life (HALEMS) from baseline to month 12 in a group comparison. A modified intention-to-treat (mITT) was performed based on a mixed linear model with repeated measures over time (ARH1-structured covariance matrix). Values of p less than 0.05 were considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 PsMS were randomly assigned 1:1 to one of the two treatment arms (male: female 1:2, median age 55 years [IQR 49-62], EDSS 6.5 [6-7.5], dropout rate 10%). There was no significant improvement in HALEMS after one year (T4) in the group comparison (-0.08 [-0.31, 0.15], p = 0.503; NNT = 22). Secondary endpoints such as subjective health status, psychological distress, and palliative care needs showed a clear response at the end of the intervention. After the intervention ended, the values approached the baseline level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary endpoint did not reach significance in this health services research feasibility study. For further development of the study design, the focus will be on the psychological and palliative factors in which PsMS-a reference group for long-term neurological conditions-were found to benefit from the CCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"489-494"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with severe multiple sclerosis (PsMS) have multidimensional, complex needs. COCOS-MS is an exploratory study of the effect of cross-sectoral care and case management (CCM) on these patients' quality of life, palliative care needs, and psychological distress, as well as caregivers' burden.

Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled, phase II trial (DRKS00022771) with two parallel treatment arms: standard care versus CCM in addition to standard care over a 12-month period. A trial-specific CCM manual was used. The target variables were recorded in standardized fashion at baseline (T0) and every three months thereafter (T1 until the end of the intervention at T4, then T5 three months after the end of the intervention to determine sustainability). The primary endpoint was the change in the patients' quality of life (HALEMS) from baseline to month 12 in a group comparison. A modified intention-to-treat (mITT) was performed based on a mixed linear model with repeated measures over time (ARH1-structured covariance matrix). Values of p less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results: 80 PsMS were randomly assigned 1:1 to one of the two treatment arms (male: female 1:2, median age 55 years [IQR 49-62], EDSS 6.5 [6-7.5], dropout rate 10%). There was no significant improvement in HALEMS after one year (T4) in the group comparison (-0.08 [-0.31, 0.15], p = 0.503; NNT = 22). Secondary endpoints such as subjective health status, psychological distress, and palliative care needs showed a clear response at the end of the intervention. After the intervention ended, the values approached the baseline level.

Conclusion: The primary endpoint did not reach significance in this health services research feasibility study. For further development of the study design, the focus will be on the psychological and palliative factors in which PsMS-a reference group for long-term neurological conditions-were found to benefit from the CCM.

多发性硬化症(COCOS-MS)患者的沟通、协调和安全:一项跨部门护理和病例管理的随机II期试验
背景:重度多发性硬化症(PsMS)患者具有多维、复杂的需求。COCOS-MS是一项跨部门护理和病例管理(CCM)对这些患者的生活质量、姑息治疗需求、心理困扰以及护理人员负担的影响的探索性研究。方法:我们进行了一项随机、对照、II期试验(DRKS00022771),包括两个平行治疗组:标准治疗与CCM以及标准治疗,为期12个月。使用了特定于试验的CCM手册。在基线(T0)和之后每三个月(T1至T4干预结束,然后在干预结束后三个月的T5,以确定可持续性)以标准化方式记录目标变量。主要终点是在组比较中患者生活质量(HALEMS)从基线到第12个月的变化。改进的意向治疗(mITT)基于混合线性模型,随时间重复测量(arh1结构协方差矩阵)。p < 0.05为显著性。结果:80例PsMS患者随机按1:1分配到两个治疗组(男:女1:2,中位年龄55岁[IQR 49-62], EDSS 6.5[6-7.5],辍学率10%)。与对照组相比,1年后HALEMS (T4)无显著改善(-0.08 [-0.31,0.15],p = 0.503;NNT = 22)。次要终点,如主观健康状况、心理困扰和缓和治疗需求在干预结束时显示出明显的反应。干预结束后,这些数值接近基线水平。结论:本卫生服务研究可行性研究的主要终点未达到意义。为了进一步发展研究设计,重点将放在心理和缓解因素上,其中psm -长期神经系统疾病的参照组-被发现从CCM中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信