What are the expectations of patients regarding the communication of nuclear imaging results? Insights from a French national survey of 723 patients.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sandra Gonzalez, Pierre Le Coz, Jean-Marc Israël, Frédéric Comte, Fabrice Rezungles, Hamza Benjelloun, Julien Mancini, David Taieb
{"title":"What are the expectations of patients regarding the communication of nuclear imaging results? Insights from a French national survey of 723 patients.","authors":"Sandra Gonzalez, Pierre Le Coz, Jean-Marc Israël, Frédéric Comte, Fabrice Rezungles, Hamza Benjelloun, Julien Mancini, David Taieb","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are still some controversies regarding the role of nuclear medicine practitioners in delivering imaging findings to the patients as well as content and magnitude of information to be delivered. The aim of the study was to identify the expectations of patients regarding the communication of results from a nuclear imaging examination.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A national survey was conducted among patients who underwent a nuclear imaging examination. In each participating centre, a questionnaire was administered to the patients.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary care in France.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study involved 723 patients from 12 French Nuclear Medicine departments (university hospitals, general hospitals, comprehensive cancer centres and private centres).</p><p><strong>Outcome measure: </strong>The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of patients expressing a wish to consult a nuclear medicine physician at the end of the imaging session and to assess the rationale underlying this preference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results indicate that a significant majority (73.2%) of patients prefer to meet primarily with the nuclear medicine physician to receive an explanation of the imaging findings. Concerning the disclosure of these results, 66.1% of the patients prefer to receive an explanation from the nuclear medicine physician, either alongside or instead of the requesting physician alone. Furthermore, nearly all patients (96.1%) who wish to meet with the nuclear medicine physician also indicate their willingness to receive the examination results, even if they are unfavourable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the clear preference of patients to interact with nuclear medicine specialists and benefit from their expertise, irrespective of whether the results are positive or negative. This emphasises the critical need for implementing standardised recommendations across countries and ensuring adequate training for nuclear physicians to actually meet this demand. This aspect is likely to distinguish a nuclear medicine physician from a scan interpreter.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 6","pages":"e099484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There are still some controversies regarding the role of nuclear medicine practitioners in delivering imaging findings to the patients as well as content and magnitude of information to be delivered. The aim of the study was to identify the expectations of patients regarding the communication of results from a nuclear imaging examination.

Design: A national survey was conducted among patients who underwent a nuclear imaging examination. In each participating centre, a questionnaire was administered to the patients.

Setting: Primary care in France.

Participants: The study involved 723 patients from 12 French Nuclear Medicine departments (university hospitals, general hospitals, comprehensive cancer centres and private centres).

Outcome measure: The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of patients expressing a wish to consult a nuclear medicine physician at the end of the imaging session and to assess the rationale underlying this preference.

Results: Our results indicate that a significant majority (73.2%) of patients prefer to meet primarily with the nuclear medicine physician to receive an explanation of the imaging findings. Concerning the disclosure of these results, 66.1% of the patients prefer to receive an explanation from the nuclear medicine physician, either alongside or instead of the requesting physician alone. Furthermore, nearly all patients (96.1%) who wish to meet with the nuclear medicine physician also indicate their willingness to receive the examination results, even if they are unfavourable.

Conclusions: This study underscores the clear preference of patients to interact with nuclear medicine specialists and benefit from their expertise, irrespective of whether the results are positive or negative. This emphasises the critical need for implementing standardised recommendations across countries and ensuring adequate training for nuclear physicians to actually meet this demand. This aspect is likely to distinguish a nuclear medicine physician from a scan interpreter.

患者对核成像结果传达的期望是什么?来自法国全国723名患者调查的见解。
目的:关于核医学从业者在向患者传递成像结果方面的作用,以及要传递的信息的内容和大小,仍然存在一些争议。本研究的目的是确定患者对核成像检查结果交流的期望。设计:对接受核成像检查的患者进行全国性调查。在每个参与中心,对患者进行问卷调查。环境:法国的初级保健。参与者:该研究涉及来自12个法国核医学部门(大学医院、综合医院、综合癌症中心和私人中心)的723名患者。结果测量:主要终点是确定在影像学检查结束时表示希望咨询核医学医师的患者比例,并评估这种偏好的基本原理。结果:我们的研究结果表明,绝大多数(73.2%)的患者倾向于首先与核医学医师会面,以获得影像学结果的解释。关于这些结果的披露,66.1%的患者更愿意接受核医学医生的解释,无论是与请求医生一起还是单独。此外,几乎所有希望与核医学医生会面的患者(96.1%)也表示愿意接受检查结果,即使他们不满意。结论:这项研究强调了患者与核医学专家互动并从他们的专业知识中获益的明显偏好,无论结果是积极的还是消极的。这强调了在各国实施标准化建议和确保对核医生进行充分培训以实际满足这一需求的迫切需要。这方面很可能区分核医学医师和扫描口译员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信