“Serviceable Instruments of His Authority” the Office of Legal Counsel, Donald Trump, and the Expansion of Executive Power

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Law & Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1111/lapo.70003
Celia Parry, Amanda Hollis-Brusky, Sean Diament
{"title":"“Serviceable Instruments of His Authority” the Office of Legal Counsel, Donald Trump, and the Expansion of Executive Power","authors":"Celia Parry,&nbsp;Amanda Hollis-Brusky,&nbsp;Sean Diament","doi":"10.1111/lapo.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), a tiny office in the United States Department of Justice, was designed to hold the executive branch to the law. But in practice, the office has often played a role in the expansion of presidential power. We analyze the publicly available OLC opinions from Trump's first term to understand whether, to what extent, and how lawyers in OLC provided legal scaffolding for President Trump's expansion of presidential power. We find that the OLC under the first Trump administration did expand power, but it did so in a manner largely consistent with previous administrations. The Trump OLC reinforced previous extensions of presidential power more frequently than it introduced novel extensions of power, citing OLC precedent from both Republican and Democratic administrations. We also note the prevalence in these opinions of language associated with the Unitary Executive Theory, a constitutional theory once considered radical that has been adopted by the conservative legal movement. Thus, even though the Trump OLC was functionally similar to previous administrations in advancing presidential prerogatives through its opinions, how it justified these reinforcements and extensions of power is functionally different from Democratic administrations—and, as some have argued, more dangerous.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), a tiny office in the United States Department of Justice, was designed to hold the executive branch to the law. But in practice, the office has often played a role in the expansion of presidential power. We analyze the publicly available OLC opinions from Trump's first term to understand whether, to what extent, and how lawyers in OLC provided legal scaffolding for President Trump's expansion of presidential power. We find that the OLC under the first Trump administration did expand power, but it did so in a manner largely consistent with previous administrations. The Trump OLC reinforced previous extensions of presidential power more frequently than it introduced novel extensions of power, citing OLC precedent from both Republican and Democratic administrations. We also note the prevalence in these opinions of language associated with the Unitary Executive Theory, a constitutional theory once considered radical that has been adopted by the conservative legal movement. Thus, even though the Trump OLC was functionally similar to previous administrations in advancing presidential prerogatives through its opinions, how it justified these reinforcements and extensions of power is functionally different from Democratic administrations—and, as some have argued, more dangerous.

法律顾问办公室,唐纳德·特朗普,以及行政权力的扩张
法律顾问办公室(OLC)是美国司法部的一个小办公室,旨在使行政部门遵守法律。但在实践中,该办公室经常在扩大总统权力方面发挥作用。我们分析了特朗普第一任期内公开的法律顾问委员会意见,以了解法律顾问委员会的律师是否、在多大程度上以及如何为特朗普总统扩大总统权力提供了法律框架。我们发现,在第一届特朗普政府的领导下,OLC确实扩大了权力,但其方式与前几届政府基本一致。特朗普的法律顾问委员会引用共和党和民主党政府的法律顾问委员会先例,更多地加强了之前总统权力的延伸,而不是引入新的权力延伸。我们还注意到,在这些意见中,普遍存在与统一行政理论相关的语言,这是一种曾经被认为是激进的宪法理论,已被保守的法律运动所采用。因此,尽管特朗普的法律顾问委员会在通过其意见推进总统特权方面在功能上与前几届政府相似,但它如何证明这些权力的加强和扩展在功能上与民主党政府不同,而且正如一些人所说的那样,它更危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信