A Mixed-Methods Framework for Assessing Differentiated Instruction Implementation Barriers in EFL Secondary Education Contexts

IF 1.9 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
MethodsX Pub Date : 2025-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103457
M. Jufrianto, Muhammad Basri, Iskandar iskandar
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Framework for Assessing Differentiated Instruction Implementation Barriers in EFL Secondary Education Contexts","authors":"M. Jufrianto,&nbsp;Muhammad Basri,&nbsp;Iskandar iskandar","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2025.103457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article presents a methodological framework for systematically investigating barriers to differentiated instruction implementation among English as Foreign Language (EFL) teachers. Our method combines:<ul><li><span>-</span><span><div>15-item Likert-scale questionnaire measuring teacher perceptions across three domains: teacher preparation, classroom implementation challenges, and institutional barriers</div></span></li><li><span>-</span><span><div>A structured classroom observation protocol assessing nine key indicators of differentiated instruction implementation</div></span></li><li><span>-</span><span><div>Statistical validation procedures establishing instrument reliability (Cronbach's Alpha 0.869) and observation consistency (Cohen's Kappa 0.81)</div></span></li></ul>This dual-instrument approach was applied to six EFL teachers in an Indonesian secondary school context, revealing significant discrepancies between theoretical knowledge and classroom practice. The framework effectively identified that while teachers possessed reasonable knowledge of differentiation principles (M=2.50, SD=0.98), process differentiation strategies were implemented by only 33% of participants. This methodology enables researchers to triangulate self-reported perceptions with observed practices, providing a comprehensive understanding of implementation barriers in language education contexts..</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 103457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125003024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a methodological framework for systematically investigating barriers to differentiated instruction implementation among English as Foreign Language (EFL) teachers. Our method combines:
  • -
    15-item Likert-scale questionnaire measuring teacher perceptions across three domains: teacher preparation, classroom implementation challenges, and institutional barriers
  • -
    A structured classroom observation protocol assessing nine key indicators of differentiated instruction implementation
  • -
    Statistical validation procedures establishing instrument reliability (Cronbach's Alpha 0.869) and observation consistency (Cohen's Kappa 0.81)
This dual-instrument approach was applied to six EFL teachers in an Indonesian secondary school context, revealing significant discrepancies between theoretical knowledge and classroom practice. The framework effectively identified that while teachers possessed reasonable knowledge of differentiation principles (M=2.50, SD=0.98), process differentiation strategies were implemented by only 33% of participants. This methodology enables researchers to triangulate self-reported perceptions with observed practices, providing a comprehensive understanding of implementation barriers in language education contexts..

Abstract Image

评估英语中等教育情境下差异化教学实施障碍的混合方法框架
本文提出了一个方法框架,用于系统地调查英语教师实施差别化教学的障碍。我们的方法结合了:-15项李克特量表问卷,测量教师在三个领域的看法:教师准备、课堂实施挑战和制度障碍——评估差异化教学实施九项关键指标的结构化课堂观察方案——建立工具可靠性(Cronbach’s Alpha 0.869)和观察一致性(Cohen’s Kappa 0.81)的统计验证程序。揭示理论知识与课堂实践之间的显著差异。该框架有效地发现,虽然教师对差异化原则有一定的了解(M=2.50, SD=0.98),但只有33%的参与者实施了过程差异化策略。这种方法使研究人员能够将自我报告的看法与观察到的实践进行三角测量,从而全面了解语言教育背景下的实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MethodsX
MethodsX Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信