Medicaid Patients Have Similar Functional Patient Outcomes but Lower Mental Health Scores Than Patients With Private Insurance Following Rotator Cuff Repair

Q3 Medicine
Melissa L. Carpenter B.S., Michael J. Murray B.S., Trevor A. Poulson M.S., Monique Haynes M.D., Alexander Mamonov, Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinosa M.D., Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D., Nikhil N. Verma M.D.
{"title":"Medicaid Patients Have Similar Functional Patient Outcomes but Lower Mental Health Scores Than Patients With Private Insurance Following Rotator Cuff Repair","authors":"Melissa L. Carpenter B.S.,&nbsp;Michael J. Murray B.S.,&nbsp;Trevor A. Poulson M.S.,&nbsp;Monique Haynes M.D.,&nbsp;Alexander Mamonov,&nbsp;Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinosa M.D.,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D.,&nbsp;Nikhil N. Verma M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine whether patients insured through Medicaid exhibit differences in patient-reported outcomes, functional measurements, reinjury, and reoperation metrics after primary rotator cuff repair compared with patients insured with private insurance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All skeletally mature patients insured through Medicaid who had undergone a primary rotator cuff repair from January 2014 to July 2023 were identified and compared with a matched cohort of patients with private insurance. Patients were excluded if they were undergoing a revision procedure, had a history of shoulder infection, did not have completed medical records or baseline patient-reported outcome measures, or were lost to follow-up before 1 year postoperatively. Patients were provided questionnaires containing the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), and reinjury and reoperation metrics. Physical therapy (PT) and clinic notes were also reviewed to determine the number of PT visits attended, number of PT visits missed, distance from patients’ home address to the PT facility, range of motion, and comorbidities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 16 patients insured through Medicaid and 16 insured through private insurance were enrolled in this study. There was no difference in average follow-up time between the 2 groups (31.1 vs 38.4 months; <em>P</em> = .391). The 2 groups showed no differences in age, body mass index, sex, smoking status, or other comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and depression. The Medicaid group had a significantly lower preoperative ASES (29.86 vs 46.28; <em>P</em> = .008). Patients insured through Medicaid also had a significantly lower postoperative VR-12 Mental Score (38.20 vs 53.40; <em>P</em> = .013). There was no significant difference in preoperative or postoperative forward flexion or external rotation between the 2 groups. The average distance from home to PT facility, the number of postoperative PT sessions attended and missed, and reinjury and reoperation rates were also similar between groups. Both groups attained the minimal clinically important difference for ASES and VR-12 Physical but not VR-12 Mental.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite Medicaid patients having a lower ASES preoperatively, they showed no difference in functional outcomes compared to patients with private insurance at final follow-up. However, patients with Medicaid had a significantly lower postoperative VR-12 Mental score, which requires further exploration.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 101148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X25000744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether patients insured through Medicaid exhibit differences in patient-reported outcomes, functional measurements, reinjury, and reoperation metrics after primary rotator cuff repair compared with patients insured with private insurance.

Methods

All skeletally mature patients insured through Medicaid who had undergone a primary rotator cuff repair from January 2014 to July 2023 were identified and compared with a matched cohort of patients with private insurance. Patients were excluded if they were undergoing a revision procedure, had a history of shoulder infection, did not have completed medical records or baseline patient-reported outcome measures, or were lost to follow-up before 1 year postoperatively. Patients were provided questionnaires containing the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), and reinjury and reoperation metrics. Physical therapy (PT) and clinic notes were also reviewed to determine the number of PT visits attended, number of PT visits missed, distance from patients’ home address to the PT facility, range of motion, and comorbidities.

Results

A total of 16 patients insured through Medicaid and 16 insured through private insurance were enrolled in this study. There was no difference in average follow-up time between the 2 groups (31.1 vs 38.4 months; P = .391). The 2 groups showed no differences in age, body mass index, sex, smoking status, or other comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and depression. The Medicaid group had a significantly lower preoperative ASES (29.86 vs 46.28; P = .008). Patients insured through Medicaid also had a significantly lower postoperative VR-12 Mental Score (38.20 vs 53.40; P = .013). There was no significant difference in preoperative or postoperative forward flexion or external rotation between the 2 groups. The average distance from home to PT facility, the number of postoperative PT sessions attended and missed, and reinjury and reoperation rates were also similar between groups. Both groups attained the minimal clinically important difference for ASES and VR-12 Physical but not VR-12 Mental.

Conclusions

Despite Medicaid patients having a lower ASES preoperatively, they showed no difference in functional outcomes compared to patients with private insurance at final follow-up. However, patients with Medicaid had a significantly lower postoperative VR-12 Mental score, which requires further exploration.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.
与肩袖修复后的私人保险患者相比,医疗补助患者的功能结果相似,但心理健康评分较低
目的:确定参加医疗补助计划的患者与参加私人保险的患者相比,在初次肩袖修复后患者报告的结果、功能测量、再损伤和再手术指标方面是否存在差异。方法选取2014年1月至2023年7月期间所有通过医疗补助计划(Medicaid)进行初级肩袖修复的骨骼成熟患者,并与一组匹配的私人保险患者进行比较。如果患者正在进行翻修手术,有肩部感染史,没有完整的医疗记录或基线患者报告的结果测量,或术后1年前没有随访,则排除患者。向患者提供问卷,其中包含美国肩关节外科医生(ASES)评分、退伍军人RAND 12项健康调查(VR-12)以及再损伤和再手术指标。物理治疗(PT)和临床记录也被回顾,以确定参加的次数,错过的次数,从病人的家庭住址到PT设施的距离,活动范围和合并症。结果本研究共纳入16例医疗补助患者和16例私人保险患者。两组患者的平均随访时间无差异(31.1个月vs 38.4个月;P = .391)。两组在年龄、体重指数、性别、吸烟状况或其他合并症(包括糖尿病、高血压和抑郁症)方面均无差异。Medicaid组术前asa明显低于前者(29.86 vs 46.28;P = .008)。通过医疗补助保险的患者术后VR-12心理评分也显著降低(38.20 vs 53.40;P = .013)。两组患者术前、术后前屈、外旋均无明显差异。从家到PT设施的平均距离,术后参加和错过的PT次数,再损伤和再手术率在两组之间也相似。两组在as和VR-12 Physical上均达到最小的临床重要差异,但在VR-12 Mental上没有。结论:尽管医疗补助患者术前asa较低,但在最终随访时,与私人保险患者相比,他们的功能结局没有差异。然而,接受医疗补助的患者术后VR-12 Mental评分明显较低,有待进一步探讨。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信