Evaluation of a low carbon cement containing calcined clay for oil well cementing

0 ENERGY & FUELS
Vlada Kovalchuk , Zichen Guo , Alexey Cheremisin , Johann Plank
{"title":"Evaluation of a low carbon cement containing calcined clay for oil well cementing","authors":"Vlada Kovalchuk ,&nbsp;Zichen Guo ,&nbsp;Alexey Cheremisin ,&nbsp;Johann Plank","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Well cements play a key role in zonal isolation of wellbores and preventing fluid or gas migration on oil, gas and geothermal wells. Creating an environmentally safe cement with excellent placement and sealing properties presents a major goal of the petroleum and geothermal industry. Unfortunately, common API (American Petroleum Institute) Class oil well cement exhibits a relatively high CO<sub>2</sub> footprint of ∼800 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/ton cement. To reduce this significant CO<sub>2</sub> emission in the production of oil well cement, calcined clay (CC) presents an option as a clinker substitute. To this end, in this study, a 50:50 wt/wt. blend of API Class G cement and a calcined clay was investigated with respect to its rheological and thickening behavior and its response to common oil well cement additives (dispersant, retarder, fluid loss additives (FLA)). Experiments were carried out at water-to-cement blend ratios of 0.44 and 0.50, respectively and at low to medium temperatures (27 <sup>°</sup>C, 50 <sup>°</sup>C and 80 <sup>°</sup>C). It was found that calcined clay increases water demand and plastic viscosity while yield point is decreased. Moreover, owed to the lower reactivity of calcined clay, it prolongs thickening time (pumping time) and requires less retarder. The results signify that within the temperature range tested here, this cement blend could achieve excellent pumpability, adjustable thickening times using a lignosulfonate retarder, and low fluid loss rates when a common FLA was applied. Furthermore, a climate-neutral cement exhibiting a CO<sub>2</sub> footprint of ∼450 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/ton binder can be achieved, yet it requires a clinker substitution rate of 70 % and increased dispersant dosage. It is demonstrated that calcined clay presents a technically feasible and environmentally preferable alternative to OPC (Ordinary Portland Cement) clinker in oil well cements, and that it can significantly reduce the CO<sub>2</sub> footprint of well cements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 214061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025004191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well cements play a key role in zonal isolation of wellbores and preventing fluid or gas migration on oil, gas and geothermal wells. Creating an environmentally safe cement with excellent placement and sealing properties presents a major goal of the petroleum and geothermal industry. Unfortunately, common API (American Petroleum Institute) Class oil well cement exhibits a relatively high CO2 footprint of ∼800 kg CO2/ton cement. To reduce this significant CO2 emission in the production of oil well cement, calcined clay (CC) presents an option as a clinker substitute. To this end, in this study, a 50:50 wt/wt. blend of API Class G cement and a calcined clay was investigated with respect to its rheological and thickening behavior and its response to common oil well cement additives (dispersant, retarder, fluid loss additives (FLA)). Experiments were carried out at water-to-cement blend ratios of 0.44 and 0.50, respectively and at low to medium temperatures (27 °C, 50 °C and 80 °C). It was found that calcined clay increases water demand and plastic viscosity while yield point is decreased. Moreover, owed to the lower reactivity of calcined clay, it prolongs thickening time (pumping time) and requires less retarder. The results signify that within the temperature range tested here, this cement blend could achieve excellent pumpability, adjustable thickening times using a lignosulfonate retarder, and low fluid loss rates when a common FLA was applied. Furthermore, a climate-neutral cement exhibiting a CO2 footprint of ∼450 kg CO2/ton binder can be achieved, yet it requires a clinker substitution rate of 70 % and increased dispersant dosage. It is demonstrated that calcined clay presents a technically feasible and environmentally preferable alternative to OPC (Ordinary Portland Cement) clinker in oil well cements, and that it can significantly reduce the CO2 footprint of well cements.

Abstract Image

含煅烧粘土的油井固井低碳水泥的评价
井固井在层间隔离、防止油气井和地热井流体或气体运移中起着至关重要的作用。创造一种具有优异的充填和密封性能的环保安全水泥是石油和地热行业的主要目标。不幸的是,普通的API(美国石油协会)级油井水泥显示出相对较高的二氧化碳足迹,每吨水泥约800公斤二氧化碳。为了减少油井水泥生产过程中显著的二氧化碳排放,煅烧粘土(CC)作为熟料替代品是一种选择。为此,在本研究中,50:50的重量/重量。研究了API G类水泥与煅烧粘土的共混物的流变性和增稠性,以及对常用油井水泥添加剂(分散剂、缓凝剂、降滤失剂)的响应。实验分别在水灰比为0.44和0.50、中低温(27°C、50°C和80°C)下进行。结果表明,煅烧后的粘土增加了需水量和塑性黏度,降低了屈服点。此外,由于煅烧粘土的反应性较低,延长了稠化时间(泵送时间),所需缓凝剂较少。结果表明,在测试的温度范围内,该水泥混合物具有优异的泵送性,使用木素磺酸盐缓凝剂可调节增稠时间,并且在使用普通FLA时具有较低的失水率。此外,可以实现气候中性水泥,其二氧化碳足迹为每吨粘合剂约450千克二氧化碳,但它需要70%的熟料替代率和增加分散剂的用量。研究表明,煅烧粘土是一种技术上可行且环保的油井水泥替代OPC(普通波特兰水泥)熟料,可以显著减少油井水泥的二氧化碳足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信