Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine as Postinduction AML Therapy.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400326
Mathilde Hunault, Cécile Pautas, Sarah Bertoli, Pierre-Yves Dumas, Emmanuel Raffoux, Marie-Anne Hospital, Tony Marchand, Maël Heiblig, Sylvain Chantepie, Martin Carré, Pierre Peterlin, Maria-Pilar Gallego-Hernanz, Emilie Lemasle, Romain Guièze, Célestine Simand, Pascal Turlure, Anne Huynh, Thibaut Leguay, Raynier Devillier, Stéphanie Nguyen Quoc, Nicolas Duployez, Isabelle Luquet, Dominique Penther, Karine Celli-Lebras, Ariane Mineur, Nicole Raus, Claude Gardin, Gérard Socié, Jean-Yves Cahn, Norbert Ifrah, Norbert Vey, Régis Peffault de Latour, Eric Delabesse, Claude Preudhomme, Jean-François Hamel, Arnaud Pigneux, Christian Récher, Hervé Dombret
{"title":"Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine as Postinduction AML Therapy.","authors":"Mathilde Hunault, Cécile Pautas, Sarah Bertoli, Pierre-Yves Dumas, Emmanuel Raffoux, Marie-Anne Hospital, Tony Marchand, Maël Heiblig, Sylvain Chantepie, Martin Carré, Pierre Peterlin, Maria-Pilar Gallego-Hernanz, Emilie Lemasle, Romain Guièze, Célestine Simand, Pascal Turlure, Anne Huynh, Thibaut Leguay, Raynier Devillier, Stéphanie Nguyen Quoc, Nicolas Duployez, Isabelle Luquet, Dominique Penther, Karine Celli-Lebras, Ariane Mineur, Nicole Raus, Claude Gardin, Gérard Socié, Jean-Yves Cahn, Norbert Ifrah, Norbert Vey, Régis Peffault de Latour, Eric Delabesse, Claude Preudhomme, Jean-François Hamel, Arnaud Pigneux, Christian Récher, Hervé Dombret","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare intermediate doses (IDAC) with high doses of cytarabine (HDAC) as postinduction therapy in patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The main objectives were to evaluate noninferiority in overall survival (OS) after IDAC and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML, except those with core-binding factor, acute promyelocytic, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, or post-myeloproliferative neoplasm AML, were eligible. After the induction course, we randomly assigned patients to either IDAC (1500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/12 hours) or HDAC (3000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/12 hours). Patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk AML were eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission. The primary end point was OS in a predefined per-protocol analysis population. The primary analyses were performed in 1132 randomly assigned patients, with a noninferiority outcome adjusted on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 risk group, the use of induction anthracycline, the response to induction, and HSCT as a function of time following treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 5 years, OS was estimated at 59.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.0 to 63.3) in the IDAC group versus 57.5% (95% CI, 53.3 to 61.5) in the HDAC group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.15; noninferiority test, P=0.0042). A preplanned analysis was unable to detect any interaction between IDAC or HDAC treatment effect and patient subgroups, including those defined by the ELN 2022 risk group or response to induction prior to random assignment. In addition, the severity of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and the incidence of related adverse events were lower after IDAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our trial shows noninferior outcomes in patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML treated with low- versus high-dose cytarabine; this occurred with similar or lower toxicities. (Funded by the Regional Clinical Research Office, Angers and others; EudraCT number, 2014-000699-24; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02416388.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 7","pages":"EVIDoa2400326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare intermediate doses (IDAC) with high doses of cytarabine (HDAC) as postinduction therapy in patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The main objectives were to evaluate noninferiority in overall survival (OS) after IDAC and safety.

Methods: Patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML, except those with core-binding factor, acute promyelocytic, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, or post-myeloproliferative neoplasm AML, were eligible. After the induction course, we randomly assigned patients to either IDAC (1500 mg/m2/12 hours) or HDAC (3000 mg/m2/12 hours). Patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk AML were eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission. The primary end point was OS in a predefined per-protocol analysis population. The primary analyses were performed in 1132 randomly assigned patients, with a noninferiority outcome adjusted on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 risk group, the use of induction anthracycline, the response to induction, and HSCT as a function of time following treatment.

Results: At 5 years, OS was estimated at 59.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.0 to 63.3) in the IDAC group versus 57.5% (95% CI, 53.3 to 61.5) in the HDAC group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.15; noninferiority test, P=0.0042). A preplanned analysis was unable to detect any interaction between IDAC or HDAC treatment effect and patient subgroups, including those defined by the ELN 2022 risk group or response to induction prior to random assignment. In addition, the severity of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and the incidence of related adverse events were lower after IDAC.

Conclusions: Our trial shows noninferior outcomes in patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML treated with low- versus high-dose cytarabine; this occurred with similar or lower toxicities. (Funded by the Regional Clinical Research Office, Angers and others; EudraCT number, 2014-000699-24; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02416388.).

中剂量阿糖胞苷诱导后AML治疗。
背景:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较中剂量(IDAC)和高剂量阿糖胞苷(HDAC)作为诱导后治疗18至60岁新诊断的急性髓性白血病(AML)患者。主要目的是评估IDAC后总生存期(OS)的非劣效性和安全性。方法:除核心结合因子、急性早幼粒细胞、费城染色体阳性或骨髓增殖性肿瘤AML外,年龄在18 - 60岁的新诊断AML患者均符合条件。诱导疗程结束后,我们随机分配患者IDAC (1500 mg/m2/12小时)或HDAC (3000 mg/m2/12小时)。中度和不良风险AML患者在首次缓解时适合异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)。主要终点是预定义的按协议分析人群中的OS。初步分析在1132名随机分配的患者中进行,根据欧洲白血病网(ELN) 2022风险组调整非劣效性结局,使用诱导蒽环类药物,对诱导的反应和HSCT作为治疗后时间的函数。结果:5年时,IDAC组的OS估计为59.3%(95%可信区间[CI], 55.0至63.3),而HDAC组的OS估计为57.5% (95% CI, 53.3至61.5)(校正风险比,0.96;95% CI, 0.80 ~ 1.15;非劣效性检验,P=0.0042)。预先计划的分析无法检测到IDAC或HDAC治疗效果与患者亚组之间的任何相互作用,包括由ELN 2022风险组定义的患者或随机分配之前对诱导的反应。此外,化疗诱导的骨髓抑制的严重程度和相关不良事件的发生率在IDAC后较低。结论:我们的试验显示,接受低剂量与高剂量阿糖胞苷治疗的18至60岁新诊断的AML患者的预后良好;这种情况发生时毒性相似或较低。(由区域临床研究办公室,Angers等资助;草案号:2014-000699-24;ClinicalTrials.gov号码:NCT02416388)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信