A Vaccine to Block Plasmodium falciparum Transmission.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400188
Sara A Healy, Issaka Sagara, Mahamadoun H Assadou, Abdoulaye Katile, Mamady Kone, Alemush Imeru, Jennifer L Kwan, Bruce J Swihart, Jonathan Fintzi, Gail E Potter, Amatigue Zeguimé, Amagana Dolo, Balla Diarra, David L Narum, Kelly M Rausch, Nicholas J MacDonald, Daming Zhu, Rathy Mohan, Ismaila Thera, Robert D Morrison, Irfan Zaidi, Justin Y A Doritchamou, Daman Sylla, Jen C C Hume, Mamadou B Coulibaly, Danielle Morelle, Marc Lievens, Ogobara K Doumbo, Patrick E Duffy
{"title":"A Vaccine to Block <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> Transmission.","authors":"Sara A Healy, Issaka Sagara, Mahamadoun H Assadou, Abdoulaye Katile, Mamady Kone, Alemush Imeru, Jennifer L Kwan, Bruce J Swihart, Jonathan Fintzi, Gail E Potter, Amatigue Zeguimé, Amagana Dolo, Balla Diarra, David L Narum, Kelly M Rausch, Nicholas J MacDonald, Daming Zhu, Rathy Mohan, Ismaila Thera, Robert D Morrison, Irfan Zaidi, Justin Y A Doritchamou, Daman Sylla, Jen C C Hume, Mamadou B Coulibaly, Danielle Morelle, Marc Lievens, Ogobara K Doumbo, Patrick E Duffy","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria vaccines that target parasite development in mosquitoes offer a strategy to block disease transmission and support control, elimination, and eradication. In this article, we evaluate Pfs230D1-exoprotein A (EPA) and Pfs25-EPA for safety, immunogenicity, and field efficacy in Malian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first conducted a comparator-controlled, dose-escalating pilot safety trial, assessing Pfs25-EPA (16 vs. 47 μg) and Pfs230D1-EPA (13 vs. 40 μg), and their combinations, each formulated in the adjuvant AS01, at a 0-, 1-, and 6-month schedule. We then conducted a randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled main trial to evaluate two Pfs230D1-EPA/AS01 regimens on a 0-, 1-, 4-, 16-month schedule. Pfs230D1-full, consisting of 40 μg of Pfs230D1-EPA plus 50 μg of AS01 for each dose, versus Pfs230D1-fractional, identical to Pfs230D1-full except for the third dose that used 8 μg of Pfs230D1-EPA and 10 μg of AS01. Primary end points were safety and reactogenicity (as-treated population), and secondary end points (as-randomly-assigned population) were immunogenicity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, serum activity by mosquito standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA), and efficacy by direct skin feeding assay (DSF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pilot safety trial, 65 participants received injections (45 Pfs230D1 and/or Pfs25; 20 comparator). In the main phase, 236 participants received injections (56 Pfs230D1-full; 61 Pfs230D1-fractional; 119 comparator). No serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in vaccinees in the pilot or main phase. Pfs230D1-full and Pfs230D1-fractional regimens induced antibody responses and transmission-reducing activity (based on SMFA) detectable up to approximately 1 year post-vaccination 3. Primary efficacy analysis showed combined Pfs230D1-full and Pfs230D1-fractional groups were not associated with reductions in mosquito positivity rate in the first 6 weeks of year 1 (efficacy, -1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11.05 to 0.46). In the Pfs230D1-full group, DSF positivity was lower by 72.5% (95% CI, 30.4 to 89.1), and the proportion of infected mosquitoes was lower by 77.3% (95% CI, 19.5 to 93.6) over two transmission seasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial, Pfs230D1-EPA/AS01 regimens did not result in SAEs and generated antibody responses and functional activity that persisted for up to 1 year postvaccination. Although the primary efficacy estimate did not demonstrate a reduction in parasite transmission during the first 6 weeks of follow-up, the full dosing regimen was associated with reduced transmission events and infected mosquitoes over 2 years. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02942277.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 7","pages":"EVIDoa2400188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malaria vaccines that target parasite development in mosquitoes offer a strategy to block disease transmission and support control, elimination, and eradication. In this article, we evaluate Pfs230D1-exoprotein A (EPA) and Pfs25-EPA for safety, immunogenicity, and field efficacy in Malian adults.

Methods: We first conducted a comparator-controlled, dose-escalating pilot safety trial, assessing Pfs25-EPA (16 vs. 47 μg) and Pfs230D1-EPA (13 vs. 40 μg), and their combinations, each formulated in the adjuvant AS01, at a 0-, 1-, and 6-month schedule. We then conducted a randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled main trial to evaluate two Pfs230D1-EPA/AS01 regimens on a 0-, 1-, 4-, 16-month schedule. Pfs230D1-full, consisting of 40 μg of Pfs230D1-EPA plus 50 μg of AS01 for each dose, versus Pfs230D1-fractional, identical to Pfs230D1-full except for the third dose that used 8 μg of Pfs230D1-EPA and 10 μg of AS01. Primary end points were safety and reactogenicity (as-treated population), and secondary end points (as-randomly-assigned population) were immunogenicity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, serum activity by mosquito standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA), and efficacy by direct skin feeding assay (DSF).

Results: In the pilot safety trial, 65 participants received injections (45 Pfs230D1 and/or Pfs25; 20 comparator). In the main phase, 236 participants received injections (56 Pfs230D1-full; 61 Pfs230D1-fractional; 119 comparator). No serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in vaccinees in the pilot or main phase. Pfs230D1-full and Pfs230D1-fractional regimens induced antibody responses and transmission-reducing activity (based on SMFA) detectable up to approximately 1 year post-vaccination 3. Primary efficacy analysis showed combined Pfs230D1-full and Pfs230D1-fractional groups were not associated with reductions in mosquito positivity rate in the first 6 weeks of year 1 (efficacy, -1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11.05 to 0.46). In the Pfs230D1-full group, DSF positivity was lower by 72.5% (95% CI, 30.4 to 89.1), and the proportion of infected mosquitoes was lower by 77.3% (95% CI, 19.5 to 93.6) over two transmission seasons.

Conclusions: In this trial, Pfs230D1-EPA/AS01 regimens did not result in SAEs and generated antibody responses and functional activity that persisted for up to 1 year postvaccination. Although the primary efficacy estimate did not demonstrate a reduction in parasite transmission during the first 6 weeks of follow-up, the full dosing regimen was associated with reduced transmission events and infected mosquitoes over 2 years. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02942277.).

阻断恶性疟原虫传播的疫苗。
背景:针对蚊子体内寄生虫发育的疟疾疫苗提供了一种阻断疾病传播和支持控制、消除和根除的策略。在这篇文章中,我们评估了Pfs230D1-exoprotein A (EPA)和Pfs25-EPA在马里成人中的安全性、免疫原性和田间药效。方法:我们首先进行了一项比较对照、剂量递增的中试安全性试验,评估Pfs25-EPA (16 vs. 47 μg)和Pfs230D1-EPA (13 vs. 40 μg)及其组合,分别在0、1和6个月的佐剂AS01中配制。然后,我们进行了一项随机、双盲、比较对照的主要试验,以评估两种Pfs230D1-EPA/AS01方案在0、1、4、16个月的时间表。Pfs230D1-full,由每剂量40 μg Pfs230D1-EPA加50 μg AS01组成,与Pfs230D1-fractional相比,除第三剂量8 μg Pfs230D1-EPA加10 μg AS01外,与Pfs230D1-full相同。主要终点是安全性和反应原性(作为处理人群),次要终点(作为随机分配人群)是酶联免疫吸附试验的免疫原性,蚊子标准膜喂养试验(SMFA)的血清活性和直接皮肤喂养试验(DSF)的疗效。结果:在先导安全性试验中,65名参与者接受了注射(45 Pfs230D1和/或Pfs25;20比较器)。在主要阶段,236名参与者接受注射(56 pfs230d1满;61 Pfs230D1-fractional;119比较器)。在试验或主要阶段,未发生严重不良事件(sae)。Pfs230D1-full和Pfs230D1-fractional方案诱导的抗体应答和传播降低活性(基于SMFA)在疫苗接种后大约1年内可检测到3。初步疗效分析显示,Pfs230D1-full组和Pfs230D1-fractional组与第1年前6周蚊虫阳性率降低无关(疗效,-1.55;95%置信区间[CI], -11.05 ~ 0.46)。Pfs230D1-full组2个传播季节DSF阳性率降低了72.5% (95% CI, 30.4 ~ 89.1),感染比例降低了77.3% (95% CI, 19.5 ~ 93.6)。结论:在这项试验中,Pfs230D1-EPA/AS01方案没有导致SAEs,并产生抗体反应和功能活性,持续到接种后1年。虽然最初的功效估计并未显示在随访的前6周内寄生虫传播减少,但在2年内,全剂量方案与传播事件和受感染蚊子的减少有关。(由国家过敏和传染病研究所和其他机构资助;ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02942277.)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信