Effectiveness of psychoeducational intervention in promoting post-stroke self-care: a systematic literature review.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2025.1569526
Victor Nhime Nungulo, Mauer Gonçalves, Maria Adriana Henriques, Cristina Lavareda Baixinho
{"title":"Effectiveness of psychoeducational intervention in promoting post-stroke self-care: a systematic literature review.","authors":"Victor Nhime Nungulo, Mauer Gonçalves, Maria Adriana Henriques, Cristina Lavareda Baixinho","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1569526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in the world, and sequelae include physical disability, difficulties with independence for self-care, and loss of mobility and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>this study was to summarize the evidence about the effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions in promoting post-stroke self-care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was carried out per the Cochrane recommendations. The following databases were included: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane, JBI, and B-on. The study as performed between December 2023 and February 2024, according to the eligibility criteria, by two independent reviewers. The bibliographic sample was evaluated for risk of bias using RoB 2, only clinical trials were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The seven articles selected, from 2019 to 2024 evaluated education to promote care and self-care; rehabilitation programmes with physical exercise; management of stress, depression and anxiety; and symptom management. Interventions relating to awareness and knowledge about post-stroke, development of healthy behavior and lifestyle reinforcement of self-care capacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This literature review found that in some studies the implementation of psychoeducational interventions improves the knowledge, independence and self-care of this population and their families, although not all of them were equally effective. The results of the articles reinforce that psychoeducational interventions may increase functional independence and the ability to carry out activities of daily living and improve health and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023483087, PROSPERO CRD42023483087.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1569526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1569526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in the world, and sequelae include physical disability, difficulties with independence for self-care, and loss of mobility and quality of life.

Objective: this study was to summarize the evidence about the effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions in promoting post-stroke self-care.

Methods: A systematic literature review was carried out per the Cochrane recommendations. The following databases were included: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane, JBI, and B-on. The study as performed between December 2023 and February 2024, according to the eligibility criteria, by two independent reviewers. The bibliographic sample was evaluated for risk of bias using RoB 2, only clinical trials were included.

Results: The seven articles selected, from 2019 to 2024 evaluated education to promote care and self-care; rehabilitation programmes with physical exercise; management of stress, depression and anxiety; and symptom management. Interventions relating to awareness and knowledge about post-stroke, development of healthy behavior and lifestyle reinforcement of self-care capacity.

Conclusions: This literature review found that in some studies the implementation of psychoeducational interventions improves the knowledge, independence and self-care of this population and their families, although not all of them were equally effective. The results of the articles reinforce that psychoeducational interventions may increase functional independence and the ability to carry out activities of daily living and improve health and quality of life.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023483087, PROSPERO CRD42023483087.

心理教育干预促进脑卒中后自我护理的有效性:系统文献综述。
背景:中风是世界上发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一,其后遗症包括身体残疾、独立生活困难、活动能力和生活质量下降。目的:总结心理教育干预促进脑卒中后自我护理的有效性证据。方法:根据Cochrane推荐进行系统的文献综述。包括以下数据库:MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Scopus、CINAHL Complete、Cochrane、JBI和B-on。根据资格标准,该研究在2023年12月至2024年2月期间由两名独立评审员进行。使用RoB 2评估文献样本的偏倚风险,仅纳入临床试验。结果:入选的7篇文章,从2019年到2024年对教育促进护理和自我护理进行了评价;康复计划及体育锻炼;管理压力、抑郁和焦虑;以及症状管理。干预措施涉及中风后的意识和知识,发展健康行为和生活方式,加强自我照顾能力。结论:本文献综述发现,在一些研究中,心理教育干预的实施提高了这一人群及其家庭的知识、独立性和自我照顾,尽管并非所有的干预都同样有效。文章的结果强调,心理教育干预可以提高功能独立性和开展日常生活活动的能力,改善健康和生活质量。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023483087, PROSPERO CRD42023483087。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信