Augmenting electronic health record data with social and environmental determinant of health measures to understand regional factors associated with asthma exacerbations.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000677
Alana Schreibman, Kimberly Lactaoen, Jaehyun Joo, Patrick K Gleeson, Gary E Weissman, Andrea J Apter, Rebecca A Hubbard, Blanca E Himes
{"title":"Augmenting electronic health record data with social and environmental determinant of health measures to understand regional factors associated with asthma exacerbations.","authors":"Alana Schreibman, Kimberly Lactaoen, Jaehyun Joo, Patrick K Gleeson, Gary E Weissman, Andrea J Apter, Rebecca A Hubbard, Blanca E Himes","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic health records (EHRs) provide rich data for diverse populations but often lack information on social and environmental determinants of health (SEDH) that are important for the study of complex conditions such as asthma, a chronic inflammatory lung disease. We integrated EHR data with seven SEDH datasets to conduct a retrospective cohort study of 6,656 adults with asthma. Using Penn Medicine encounter data from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020, we identified individual-level and spatially-varying factors associated with asthma exacerbations. Black race and prescription of an inhaled corticosteroid were strong risk factors for asthma exacerbations according to a logistic regression model of individual-level risk. A spatial generalized additive model (GAM) identified a hotspot of increased exacerbation risk (mean OR = 1.41, SD 0.14, p < 0.001), and inclusion of EHR-derived variables in the model attenuated the spatial variance in exacerbation odds by 34.0%, while additionally adjusting for the SEDH variables attenuated the spatial variance in exacerbation odds by 66.9%. Additional spatial GAMs adjusted one variable at a time revealed that neighborhood deprivation (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.07), Black race (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.91), and Medicaid health insurance (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.46) contributed most to the spatial variation in exacerbation odds. In spatial GAMs stratified by race, adjusting for neighborhood deprivation and health insurance type did not change the spatial distribution of exacerbation odds. Thus, while some EHR-derived and SEDH variables explained a large proportion of the spatial variance in asthma exacerbations across Philadelphia, a more detailed understanding of SEDH variables that vary by race is necessary to address asthma disparities. More broadly, our findings demonstrate how integration of information on SEDH with EHR data can improve understanding of the combination of risk factors that contribute to complex diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 6","pages":"e0000677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) provide rich data for diverse populations but often lack information on social and environmental determinants of health (SEDH) that are important for the study of complex conditions such as asthma, a chronic inflammatory lung disease. We integrated EHR data with seven SEDH datasets to conduct a retrospective cohort study of 6,656 adults with asthma. Using Penn Medicine encounter data from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020, we identified individual-level and spatially-varying factors associated with asthma exacerbations. Black race and prescription of an inhaled corticosteroid were strong risk factors for asthma exacerbations according to a logistic regression model of individual-level risk. A spatial generalized additive model (GAM) identified a hotspot of increased exacerbation risk (mean OR = 1.41, SD 0.14, p < 0.001), and inclusion of EHR-derived variables in the model attenuated the spatial variance in exacerbation odds by 34.0%, while additionally adjusting for the SEDH variables attenuated the spatial variance in exacerbation odds by 66.9%. Additional spatial GAMs adjusted one variable at a time revealed that neighborhood deprivation (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.07), Black race (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.91), and Medicaid health insurance (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.46) contributed most to the spatial variation in exacerbation odds. In spatial GAMs stratified by race, adjusting for neighborhood deprivation and health insurance type did not change the spatial distribution of exacerbation odds. Thus, while some EHR-derived and SEDH variables explained a large proportion of the spatial variance in asthma exacerbations across Philadelphia, a more detailed understanding of SEDH variables that vary by race is necessary to address asthma disparities. More broadly, our findings demonstrate how integration of information on SEDH with EHR data can improve understanding of the combination of risk factors that contribute to complex diseases.

利用社会和环境健康决定因素措施增强电子健康记录数据,以了解与哮喘恶化相关的区域因素。
电子健康记录(EHRs)为不同的人群提供了丰富的数据,但往往缺乏关于健康的社会和环境决定因素(SEDH)的信息,而这些信息对哮喘(一种慢性炎症性肺病)等复杂疾病的研究至关重要。我们整合了EHR数据和7个SEDH数据集,对6656名成人哮喘患者进行了回顾性队列研究。利用宾夕法尼亚大学医学院2017年1月1日至2020年12月31日的数据,我们确定了与哮喘恶化相关的个体水平和空间变化因素。根据个体水平风险的logistic回归模型,黑人和吸入皮质类固醇处方是哮喘加重的强危险因素。空间广义加性模型(GAM)确定了加重风险增加的热点(平均OR = 1.41, SD 0.14, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信