State of the Field: Radiology Residency Clinician Educator Tracks.

Sophia R O'Brien, Erin Gomez, Kirang Patel, Shanna Matalon, Mohamed S Muneer, Alex Le Lindqwister, Rowa A Mohamed, Margaret Lin, Scott Simpson
{"title":"State of the Field: Radiology Residency Clinician Educator Tracks.","authors":"Sophia R O'Brien, Erin Gomez, Kirang Patel, Shanna Matalon, Mohamed S Muneer, Alex Le Lindqwister, Rowa A Mohamed, Margaret Lin, Scott Simpson","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Radiology resident clinician educator tracks (CETs) are designed to prepare residents for a career in academia. The number and structure of US radiology CETs is unknown. This study sought to describe the current state of the field of US diagnostic radiology CETs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multimethod observational cross-sectional study involved an online survey and virtual semistructured interviews. AMA Freida website search was performed in February 2024 to identify programs with radiology CETs. All identified tracks were sent the online survey, and three programs with a known track or track in creation not listed in AMA Freida were also surveyed. Half of the surveyed CETs were randomly invited to interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 active or potentially active radiology CETs were identified, reflecting 11.6% of all US diagnostic radiology residencies, of which 18 programs responded (78% response rate). CET length and structure varied. A slight majority of tracks are resident-led (9 of 17, 53%). Most faculty track leaders do not receive protected academic time for their role (15 of 17, 88%), and only half of the CETs reported sufficient institutional support. The most common key components of radiology CETs are lectures, track meetings, mentorship, and capstone projects. All CETs directly observe resident teaching. Four of 9 invited programs (44%) completed semistructured interviews and described the importance of, and challenges with, faculty engagement and resident project completion.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study describes the state of radiology CETs, including their keys to success, challenges, and recommendations for others creating a track. Future research should investigate CET outcomes and further explore resident experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Radiology resident clinician educator tracks (CETs) are designed to prepare residents for a career in academia. The number and structure of US radiology CETs is unknown. This study sought to describe the current state of the field of US diagnostic radiology CETs.

Methods: This multimethod observational cross-sectional study involved an online survey and virtual semistructured interviews. AMA Freida website search was performed in February 2024 to identify programs with radiology CETs. All identified tracks were sent the online survey, and three programs with a known track or track in creation not listed in AMA Freida were also surveyed. Half of the surveyed CETs were randomly invited to interview.

Results: A total of 23 active or potentially active radiology CETs were identified, reflecting 11.6% of all US diagnostic radiology residencies, of which 18 programs responded (78% response rate). CET length and structure varied. A slight majority of tracks are resident-led (9 of 17, 53%). Most faculty track leaders do not receive protected academic time for their role (15 of 17, 88%), and only half of the CETs reported sufficient institutional support. The most common key components of radiology CETs are lectures, track meetings, mentorship, and capstone projects. All CETs directly observe resident teaching. Four of 9 invited programs (44%) completed semistructured interviews and described the importance of, and challenges with, faculty engagement and resident project completion.

Discussion: This study describes the state of radiology CETs, including their keys to success, challenges, and recommendations for others creating a track. Future research should investigate CET outcomes and further explore resident experiences.

领域现状:放射住院医师临床医师教育跟踪。
目的:放射科住院医师临床医师教育培训(cet)旨在为住院医师在学术界的职业生涯做好准备。美国放射学cet的数量和结构尚不清楚。本研究试图描述美国诊断放射学cts领域的现状。方法:这项多方法观察性横断面研究包括在线调查和虚拟半结构化访谈。AMA Freida网站搜索于2024年2月进行,以确定放射学cet项目。所有确定的曲目都被发送到在线调查中,并且有三个已知曲目或未在AMA Freida中列出的创作曲目的节目也被调查。一半被调查的大学英语考生被随机邀请参加面试。结果:共确定了23个活跃或潜在活跃的放射学cet,反映了美国所有诊断放射学住院医师的11.6%,其中18个项目有反应(78%的反应率)。CET长度和结构各不相同。大多数歌曲是由居民主导的(9/17,53%)。大多数教师跟踪领导没有获得受保护的学习时间(15% / 17%,88%),只有一半的cet报告了足够的机构支持。放射学cet最常见的关键组成部分是讲座、跟踪会议、指导和顶点项目。所有的cet直接接受驻校教学。9个受邀项目中有4个(44%)完成了半结构化访谈,并描述了教师参与和常驻项目完成的重要性和挑战。讨论:本研究描述了放射学cet的现状,包括其成功的关键,挑战和对其他人创建跟踪的建议。未来的研究应该调查cts的结果,并进一步探索居民体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信