Subtropical southern Africa fire emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia obtained with satellite observations and GEOS-Chem.

IF 2.8 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Eloise A Marais, Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, Christine Wiedinmyer, Killian Murphy, Guido R van der Werf
{"title":"Subtropical southern Africa fire emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia obtained with satellite observations and GEOS-Chem.","authors":"Eloise A Marais, Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, Christine Wiedinmyer, Killian Murphy, Guido R van der Werf","doi":"10.1039/d5ea00041f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Landscape fires in subtropical southern Africa (2-20°S) are a prominent regional source of nitrogen oxides (NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> ) and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>), affecting climate and air quality as precursors of tropospheric ozone and aerosols. Here we evaluate GEOS-Chem model skill at reproducing satellite observations of vertical column densities of NO<sub>2</sub> from TROPOMI and NH<sub>3</sub> from IASI driven with three distinct and widely used biomass burning inventories (FINNv2.5, GFEDv4s, GFASv1.2). We identify that GFASv1.2 use of fire radiative power and a NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> emission factor that is almost half that used by the other two inventories is most consistent with TROPOMI and that FINNv2.5 use of active fires and landscape-specific fuel loads and biomass consumed is most consistent with IASI. We use a simple mass-balance inversion to calculate top-down NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions of 1.9 ± 0.6 Tg NO for June-October and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions of 1.2 ± 0.4 Tg for July-October. All inventories collocate NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions, whereas most of the pronounced emissions of NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> are separate and have distinct seasonality in the top-down estimate. We infer with GEOS-Chem more efficient ozone production (13 Tg ozone per Tg NO) with the top-down informed NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions than the inventory emissions, as GFASv1.2 NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> is almost 20% less than top-down NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> and the 2.3- to 2.5-times greater FINNv2.5 and GFEDv4s NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> reduces sensitivity of ozone formation to NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> . Both NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> top-down emissions are unaffected by use of plume injection heights, limited to GFASv1.2 in GEOS-Chem, and NH<sub>3</sub> is insensitive to acidic sulfate and nitrate aerosol emissions absent in all inventories. The top-down emissions estimates and comparison to satellite observations suggest a hybrid bottom-up approach could be adopted to discern byproducts of smouldering and flaming fires.</p>","PeriodicalId":72942,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science: atmospheres","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science: atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ea00041f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landscape fires in subtropical southern Africa (2-20°S) are a prominent regional source of nitrogen oxides (NO x ) and ammonia (NH3), affecting climate and air quality as precursors of tropospheric ozone and aerosols. Here we evaluate GEOS-Chem model skill at reproducing satellite observations of vertical column densities of NO2 from TROPOMI and NH3 from IASI driven with three distinct and widely used biomass burning inventories (FINNv2.5, GFEDv4s, GFASv1.2). We identify that GFASv1.2 use of fire radiative power and a NO x emission factor that is almost half that used by the other two inventories is most consistent with TROPOMI and that FINNv2.5 use of active fires and landscape-specific fuel loads and biomass consumed is most consistent with IASI. We use a simple mass-balance inversion to calculate top-down NO x emissions of 1.9 ± 0.6 Tg NO for June-October and NH3 emissions of 1.2 ± 0.4 Tg for July-October. All inventories collocate NO x and NH3 emissions, whereas most of the pronounced emissions of NO x and NH3 are separate and have distinct seasonality in the top-down estimate. We infer with GEOS-Chem more efficient ozone production (13 Tg ozone per Tg NO) with the top-down informed NO x emissions than the inventory emissions, as GFASv1.2 NO x is almost 20% less than top-down NO x and the 2.3- to 2.5-times greater FINNv2.5 and GFEDv4s NO x reduces sensitivity of ozone formation to NO x . Both NO x and NH3 top-down emissions are unaffected by use of plume injection heights, limited to GFASv1.2 in GEOS-Chem, and NH3 is insensitive to acidic sulfate and nitrate aerosol emissions absent in all inventories. The top-down emissions estimates and comparison to satellite observations suggest a hybrid bottom-up approach could be adopted to discern byproducts of smouldering and flaming fires.

通过卫星观测和GEOS-Chem获得的亚热带南部非洲的氮氧化物和氨的排放。
亚热带南部非洲(2-20°S)的景观火灾是氮氧化物(NO x)和氨(NH3)的重要区域来源,作为对流层臭氧和气溶胶的前体影响气候和空气质量。本文利用三种不同且广泛使用的生物质燃烧清单(FINNv2.5, GFEDv4s, GFASv1.2),评估了GEOS-Chem模型在再现TROPOMI和IASI中NO2垂直柱密度的卫星观测数据方面的能力。我们发现,GFASv1.2使用的火灾辐射功率和nox排放因子几乎是其他两个清单的一半,与TROPOMI最一致,FINNv2.5使用的活跃火灾和特定景观的燃料负荷和生物质消耗与IASI最一致。我们使用简单的质量平衡反演计算了6 - 10月自上而下的NO x排放量为1.9±0.6 Tg NO, 7 - 10月NH3排放量为1.2±0.4 Tg。所有清单都将nox和NH3的排放量组合在一起,而在自上而下的估算中,大多数nox和NH3的显著排放量是分开的,具有明显的季节性。我们通过GEOS-Chem推断,与清单排放相比,自上而下的nox排放更有效地产生臭氧(每Tg NO 13 Tg臭氧),因为GFASv1.2 nox比自上而下的nox少近20%,而FINNv2.5和GFEDv4s nox则高2.3至2.5倍,降低了臭氧形成对nox的敏感性。nox和NH3自上而下的排放不受烟羽喷射高度的影响,在GEOS-Chem中仅限于GFASv1.2,而NH3对所有清单中没有的酸性硫酸盐和硝酸盐气溶胶排放不敏感。自上而下的排放估计以及与卫星观测的比较表明,可以采用一种混合的自下而上的方法来识别阴燃和燃烧的火灾的副产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信