Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials and in clinical practice: report from the XXI national conference of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

BMJ oncology Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000783
Alberto Puccini, Giuseppe Viscardi, Oriana Ciani, Fabio Efficace, Angela Piattelli, Giordano Domenico Beretta, Davide Petruzzelli, Patrizia Popoli, Francesco De Lorenzo, Francesco Longo, Marco Zibellini, Lara Gitto, Antonella Brunello, Evaristo Maiello, Alberto Servetto, Martina Pagliuca, Alessandra Raimondi, Laura Marandino, Saverio Cinieri, Elisabetta Iannelli, Carla Ida Ripamonti, Paolo Bossi, Gianmauro Numico, Tiziana Latiano, Carmine Pinto, Silvana Quaglini, Laura Locati, Gualberto Gussoni, Gianluca Mignone, Pricivel M Carrera, Ethan Basch, Massimo Di Maio, Francesco Perrone
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials and in clinical practice: report from the XXI national conference of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).","authors":"Alberto Puccini, Giuseppe Viscardi, Oriana Ciani, Fabio Efficace, Angela Piattelli, Giordano Domenico Beretta, Davide Petruzzelli, Patrizia Popoli, Francesco De Lorenzo, Francesco Longo, Marco Zibellini, Lara Gitto, Antonella Brunello, Evaristo Maiello, Alberto Servetto, Martina Pagliuca, Alessandra Raimondi, Laura Marandino, Saverio Cinieri, Elisabetta Iannelli, Carla Ida Ripamonti, Paolo Bossi, Gianmauro Numico, Tiziana Latiano, Carmine Pinto, Silvana Quaglini, Laura Locati, Gualberto Gussoni, Gianluca Mignone, Pricivel M Carrera, Ethan Basch, Massimo Di Maio, Francesco Perrone","doi":"10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are considered the gold standard for the assessment of subjective symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and patient well-being in both clinical trials and clinical practice. Here, we report key discussions and findings from the 21st National Conference of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology, held in Bologna on 21-22 June 2024, with a focus on the integration and impact of PROs in oncology research and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Leading national and international experts presented and analysed data regarding the use of PROs in clinical trials and routine oncology care. Topics included the role of electronic PROs (ePROs), digital therapeutics, financial toxicity as a PRO and methodologies for standardising QoL assessment. Insights were drawn from expert presentations, consensus discussions and practical experiences shared during the conference sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experts emphasised that PROs should be included as key endpoints in clinical trials, with timely publication of results and standardised methodologies for analysis and interpretation. The conference highlighted the critical importance of incorporating PROs and QoL measures throughout the cancer care continuum-from screening to survivorship. In clinical practice, PROs improve patient-centred care and communication, particularly when oncologists are trained to interpret QoL data. The use of ePROs was noted as a valuable tool to support digital health interventions. Financial toxicity emerged as a significant PRO, with screening tools recommended to identify and support at-risk patients. Key organisational challenges were identified, including technological barriers, resource constraints and the need for responsive infrastructure to support real-time PRO integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of PROs, including ePROs and financial toxicity assessments, is essential for advancing quality cancer care. Standardisation, digital innovation and targeted clinician education are critical to integrating PROs effectively in both research and clinical settings. Addressing infrastructural and technological challenges will be vital for optimising patient outcomes and ensuring optimal care across the cancer journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":72436,"journal":{"name":"BMJ oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are considered the gold standard for the assessment of subjective symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and patient well-being in both clinical trials and clinical practice. Here, we report key discussions and findings from the 21st National Conference of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology, held in Bologna on 21-22 June 2024, with a focus on the integration and impact of PROs in oncology research and clinical practice.

Methods and analysis: Leading national and international experts presented and analysed data regarding the use of PROs in clinical trials and routine oncology care. Topics included the role of electronic PROs (ePROs), digital therapeutics, financial toxicity as a PRO and methodologies for standardising QoL assessment. Insights were drawn from expert presentations, consensus discussions and practical experiences shared during the conference sessions.

Results: Experts emphasised that PROs should be included as key endpoints in clinical trials, with timely publication of results and standardised methodologies for analysis and interpretation. The conference highlighted the critical importance of incorporating PROs and QoL measures throughout the cancer care continuum-from screening to survivorship. In clinical practice, PROs improve patient-centred care and communication, particularly when oncologists are trained to interpret QoL data. The use of ePROs was noted as a valuable tool to support digital health interventions. Financial toxicity emerged as a significant PRO, with screening tools recommended to identify and support at-risk patients. Key organisational challenges were identified, including technological barriers, resource constraints and the need for responsive infrastructure to support real-time PRO integration.

Conclusion: The implementation of PROs, including ePROs and financial toxicity assessments, is essential for advancing quality cancer care. Standardisation, digital innovation and targeted clinician education are critical to integrating PROs effectively in both research and clinical settings. Addressing infrastructural and technological challenges will be vital for optimising patient outcomes and ensuring optimal care across the cancer journey.

临床试验和临床实践中患者报告的结果(PROs):来自意大利肿瘤医学协会(AIOM)第21届全国会议的报告
目的:在临床试验和临床实践中,患者报告的预后(pro)被认为是评估主观症状、生活质量(QoL)和患者幸福感的金标准。在这里,我们报告了2024年6月21日至22日在博洛尼亚举行的意大利肿瘤医学协会第21届全国会议的主要讨论和发现,重点是肿瘤研究和临床实践中PROs的整合和影响。方法和分析:领先的国内和国际专家介绍和分析了PROs在临床试验和常规肿瘤治疗中的使用数据。主题包括电子PROs (ePROs)的作用、数字疗法、作为PRO的财务毒性以及标准化生活质量评估的方法。会议期间专家的发言、协商一致的讨论和分享的实际经验都为与会者提供了见解。结果:专家强调,应将PROs作为临床试验的关键终点,及时公布结果并采用标准化的分析和解释方法。会议强调了在整个癌症治疗过程中——从筛查到生存——纳入PROs和QoL指标的重要性。在临床实践中,专业医师改善了以患者为中心的护理和沟通,特别是当肿瘤学家接受了解释生活质量数据的培训时。与会者指出,电子病历的使用是支持数字卫生干预措施的宝贵工具。经济毒性成为一个重要的PRO,推荐使用筛选工具来识别和支持有风险的患者。确定了关键的组织挑战,包括技术障碍、资源限制和响应性基础设施的需求,以支持实时PRO集成。结论:实施包括ePROs和财务毒性评估在内的PROs对提高癌症治疗质量至关重要。标准化、数字化创新和有针对性的临床医生教育对于在研究和临床环境中有效整合PROs至关重要。解决基础设施和技术挑战对于优化患者治疗结果和确保整个癌症治疗过程中的最佳护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信