Interventions and Strategies for Reducing Episiotomy Rates Globally: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Angela W Chen, Maiah J Hall, Molly R Altman
{"title":"Interventions and Strategies for Reducing Episiotomy Rates Globally: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Angela W Chen, Maiah J Hall, Molly R Altman","doi":"10.1111/birt.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Episiotomy is still commonly practiced during childbirth worldwide, despite decades of scientific evidence that indicates no justification for its routine use. Routine episiotomy is associated with increased risk of serious maternal morbidity and no improvements in neonatal outcomes. We sought to analyze this gap between evidence-based knowledge and implementation surrounding reducing episiotomy practice. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify practices that have resulted in a change in episiotomy rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched three databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase) using key words and subject headings with no time restriction. Any studies published in English and reporting an original empirical analysis in any global, regional, or country-specific context that examined practice changes that were implemented and reported episiotomy as an outcome were included in our review. Studies were excluded if they only reported on trends or changes in episiotomy rates without examining the specific practices implemented. We sought to identify practices that resulted in a change in episiotomy rates, rather than to evaluate or compare the effectiveness of these practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Search results returned 1265 records; 40 papers met the inclusion criteria for a full review. Twenty-five papers were included in our final analysis. All included studies documented a decrease in episiotomy rates, with 21 studies reporting a statistically significant reduction. Most studies were mixed interventions, often a combination of an educational intervention and audit and feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specific practice changes have been shown to effectively decrease the incidence of episiotomy. The findings from our review provide actionable insights for implementing evidence-based interventions to improve obstetric care. Prioritizing respectful birthing practices and reducing the routine use of episiotomy are critical steps toward addressing obstetric violence and promoting equitable, patient-centered maternity care globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Episiotomy is still commonly practiced during childbirth worldwide, despite decades of scientific evidence that indicates no justification for its routine use. Routine episiotomy is associated with increased risk of serious maternal morbidity and no improvements in neonatal outcomes. We sought to analyze this gap between evidence-based knowledge and implementation surrounding reducing episiotomy practice. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify practices that have resulted in a change in episiotomy rates.

Methods: We searched three databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase) using key words and subject headings with no time restriction. Any studies published in English and reporting an original empirical analysis in any global, regional, or country-specific context that examined practice changes that were implemented and reported episiotomy as an outcome were included in our review. Studies were excluded if they only reported on trends or changes in episiotomy rates without examining the specific practices implemented. We sought to identify practices that resulted in a change in episiotomy rates, rather than to evaluate or compare the effectiveness of these practices.

Results: Search results returned 1265 records; 40 papers met the inclusion criteria for a full review. Twenty-five papers were included in our final analysis. All included studies documented a decrease in episiotomy rates, with 21 studies reporting a statistically significant reduction. Most studies were mixed interventions, often a combination of an educational intervention and audit and feedback.

Conclusions: Specific practice changes have been shown to effectively decrease the incidence of episiotomy. The findings from our review provide actionable insights for implementing evidence-based interventions to improve obstetric care. Prioritizing respectful birthing practices and reducing the routine use of episiotomy are critical steps toward addressing obstetric violence and promoting equitable, patient-centered maternity care globally.

全球降低外阴切开术率的干预措施和策略:一项系统综述。
导读:外阴切开术在世界范围内仍然普遍应用于分娩,尽管几十年的科学证据表明没有理由将其作为常规使用。常规外阴切开术与严重产妇发病率增加和新生儿结局无改善相关。我们试图分析循证知识与围绕减少会阴切开术实践的实施之间的差距。我们系统地回顾了文献,以确定导致外阴切开术率变化的做法。方法:检索PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL Complete、Embase 3个数据库,检索关键词和主题词,检索时间不限。在全球、地区或国家特定背景下,任何以英文发表并报告原始实证分析的研究都被纳入我们的综述,这些研究检查了实施外阴切开术的实践变化并报告了其结果。如果研究只报告了外阴切开术率的趋势或变化,而没有检查实施的具体做法,则排除研究。我们试图确定导致会阴切开术率变化的做法,而不是评估或比较这些做法的有效性。结果:搜索结果返回1265条记录;40篇论文符合全面综述的纳入标准。我们的最终分析包括25篇论文。所有纳入的研究都记录了会阴切开术发生率的降低,其中21项研究报告了统计学上显著的降低。大多数研究都是混合干预,通常是教育干预和审计和反馈的结合。结论:具体的实践改变已被证明可以有效地降低会阴切开术的发生率。我们综述的结果为实施循证干预措施以改善产科护理提供了可行的见解。优先考虑尊重分娩做法和减少外阴切开术的常规使用是解决产科暴力和促进全球公平、以患者为中心的产科护理的关键步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信