Postures communicationnelles des spécialistes en médecine générale dans le dépistage familial du cancer colorectal.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Griselda Drouet, Fabienne Moreau, Nicolas Palierne, Pierre Ingrand, Aline Delsart, Elisabeth Richard, Isabelle Ingrand
{"title":"Postures communicationnelles des spécialistes en médecine générale dans le dépistage familial du cancer colorectal.","authors":"Griselda Drouet, Fabienne Moreau, Nicolas Palierne, Pierre Ingrand, Aline Delsart, Elisabeth Richard, Isabelle Ingrand","doi":"10.3917/spub.252.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenoma before the age of 65 (index patients) are at increased risk of CRC, but the guidelines for family screening of FDRs by colonoscopy are poorly followed. The aim of this study was to describe the involvement of primary care physicians (PCPs) with patients (relatives at high risk of colorectal cancer or index patients) and their communicative stance in the context of family screening in relation to the various people involved (other physicians, index patients, and relatives).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was based on 29 semi-structured telephone interviews with French PCPs of index patients and/or their FDRs. The fully transcribed corpus of interviews was put through linguistic analysis using a lexicometric tool to identify discourse objects based on frequency calculations, and for the purposes of thematic sociological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses showed that family screening is conditioned by communication between PCPs and index patients, whom they encourage to pass on the guidelines to their relatives, and by conversations with doctors from other specialisms, who provide them with precise information about the diagnosis. FDRs have a more \"classic\" relationship with their PCPs, who ask questions in order to ascertain the patient's history and thus direct them toward appropriate screening. The stance of PCPs thus seems to alternate between supervision and reflection, and between consultation and questioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 2","pages":"101-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.252.0101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenoma before the age of 65 (index patients) are at increased risk of CRC, but the guidelines for family screening of FDRs by colonoscopy are poorly followed. The aim of this study was to describe the involvement of primary care physicians (PCPs) with patients (relatives at high risk of colorectal cancer or index patients) and their communicative stance in the context of family screening in relation to the various people involved (other physicians, index patients, and relatives).

Method: The study was based on 29 semi-structured telephone interviews with French PCPs of index patients and/or their FDRs. The fully transcribed corpus of interviews was put through linguistic analysis using a lexicometric tool to identify discourse objects based on frequency calculations, and for the purposes of thematic sociological analysis.

Results: The analyses showed that family screening is conditioned by communication between PCPs and index patients, whom they encourage to pass on the guidelines to their relatives, and by conversations with doctors from other specialisms, who provide them with precise information about the diagnosis. FDRs have a more "classic" relationship with their PCPs, who ask questions in order to ascertain the patient's history and thus direct them toward appropriate screening. The stance of PCPs thus seems to alternate between supervision and reflection, and between consultation and questioning.

全科医生在家庭结肠直肠癌筛查中的交流姿势。
导读:65岁前结直肠癌(CRC)或晚期腺瘤患者(指数患者)的一级亲属(FDRs)发生CRC的风险增加,但通过结肠镜筛查FDRs的家庭指南却很少得到遵守。本研究的目的是描述初级保健医生(pcp)与患者(结直肠癌高风险亲属或指数患者)的参与情况,以及他们在家庭筛查背景下与各种相关人员(其他医生、指数患者和亲属)的沟通立场。方法:采用半结构化电话访谈法,对29名指数患者的法国pcp和/或fdr进行访谈。为了主题社会学分析的目的,使用词典计量工具对完整转录的访谈语料库进行语言分析,以确定基于频率计算的话语对象。结果:分析表明,pcp和索引患者之间的沟通(他们鼓励索引患者将指南传递给他们的亲属)以及与其他专业的医生的对话(这些医生为他们提供了关于诊断的准确信息)决定了家庭筛查的条件。fdr与他们的pcp有一种更“经典”的关系,pcp会问一些问题,以确定病人的病史,从而指导他们进行适当的筛查。因此,pcp的立场似乎在监督和反思之间,在咨询和质疑之间交替。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信