Griselda Drouet, Fabienne Moreau, Nicolas Palierne, Pierre Ingrand, Aline Delsart, Elisabeth Richard, Isabelle Ingrand
{"title":"Postures communicationnelles des spécialistes en médecine générale dans le dépistage familial du cancer colorectal.","authors":"Griselda Drouet, Fabienne Moreau, Nicolas Palierne, Pierre Ingrand, Aline Delsart, Elisabeth Richard, Isabelle Ingrand","doi":"10.3917/spub.252.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenoma before the age of 65 (index patients) are at increased risk of CRC, but the guidelines for family screening of FDRs by colonoscopy are poorly followed. The aim of this study was to describe the involvement of primary care physicians (PCPs) with patients (relatives at high risk of colorectal cancer or index patients) and their communicative stance in the context of family screening in relation to the various people involved (other physicians, index patients, and relatives).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was based on 29 semi-structured telephone interviews with French PCPs of index patients and/or their FDRs. The fully transcribed corpus of interviews was put through linguistic analysis using a lexicometric tool to identify discourse objects based on frequency calculations, and for the purposes of thematic sociological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses showed that family screening is conditioned by communication between PCPs and index patients, whom they encourage to pass on the guidelines to their relatives, and by conversations with doctors from other specialisms, who provide them with precise information about the diagnosis. FDRs have a more \"classic\" relationship with their PCPs, who ask questions in order to ascertain the patient's history and thus direct them toward appropriate screening. The stance of PCPs thus seems to alternate between supervision and reflection, and between consultation and questioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 2","pages":"101-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.252.0101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenoma before the age of 65 (index patients) are at increased risk of CRC, but the guidelines for family screening of FDRs by colonoscopy are poorly followed. The aim of this study was to describe the involvement of primary care physicians (PCPs) with patients (relatives at high risk of colorectal cancer or index patients) and their communicative stance in the context of family screening in relation to the various people involved (other physicians, index patients, and relatives).
Method: The study was based on 29 semi-structured telephone interviews with French PCPs of index patients and/or their FDRs. The fully transcribed corpus of interviews was put through linguistic analysis using a lexicometric tool to identify discourse objects based on frequency calculations, and for the purposes of thematic sociological analysis.
Results: The analyses showed that family screening is conditioned by communication between PCPs and index patients, whom they encourage to pass on the guidelines to their relatives, and by conversations with doctors from other specialisms, who provide them with precise information about the diagnosis. FDRs have a more "classic" relationship with their PCPs, who ask questions in order to ascertain the patient's history and thus direct them toward appropriate screening. The stance of PCPs thus seems to alternate between supervision and reflection, and between consultation and questioning.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc