Association between Exposure to Statin Choice and Adherence to Statins: An Observational Cohort Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kathryn A Martinez, Victor M Montori, Fatima Rodriguez, Larisa G Tereshchenko, Jeffrey D Kovach, Christopher Boyer, Heather McKee Hurwitz, Michael B Rothberg
{"title":"Association between Exposure to Statin Choice and Adherence to Statins: An Observational Cohort Study.","authors":"Kathryn A Martinez, Victor M Montori, Fatima Rodriguez, Larisa G Tereshchenko, Jeffrey D Kovach, Christopher Boyer, Heather McKee Hurwitz, Michael B Rothberg","doi":"10.1177/0272989X251346508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundStatin Choice is a shared decision-making encounter tool embedded in the electronic health record.ObjectiveTo describe the association between the use of Statin Choice, statin prescriptions by clinicians, prescription fills (primary adherence), and statin adherence at 12 mo (secondary adherence).DesignObservational cohort study at the Cleveland Clinic Health System.SubjectsStatin-naïve adults aged 40 to 75 y with a 10-y atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk of ≥5% and a primary care appointment between January 2020 and July 2021.Main MeasuresThe primary exposure was the use of Statin Choice during a clinical encounter. We measured whether the use of Statin Choice was associated with statin prescriptions. We measured statin adherence based on pharmacy fill data at 60 d (primary adherence) and 12 mo (secondary adherence). We used mixed-effects logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds of statin prescriptions and adherence at the 3 time points by the use of Statin Choice.Key ResultsAmong 17,001 statin-naïve patients, 13% viewed Statin Choice and 7% were prescribed a statin. The median ASCVD risk was 10%. Patients who were shown Statin Choice had 9.04 higher odds of being prescribed a statin compared with patients not shown Statin Choice (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.86-10.4). Among patients prescribed a statin, the use of Statin Choice was associated with 5.75 higher odds of primary adherence compared with usual care (95% CI: 4.22-7.83). At 12 mo, Statin Choice use was significantly associated with adherence in the unadjusted analysis (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.05-2.08) but was not significant after adjustment for patient factors. Patients shown Statin Choice had an average of 12 mg/dL reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 mo (95% CI: -16 mg/dL, -10) compared with those not shown Statin Choice.ConclusionIn this observational study, Statin Choice use was strongly associated with statin prescription and fills and weakly associated with adherence to statins for up to 1 y. A randomized trial is needed to confirm causality.HighlightsStatin Choice is an electronic health record-embedded shared decision-making encounter tool available for free in many health care systems.Small randomized controlled trials have found modest associations between the use of Statin Choice and statin adherence using patient-reported data.In our large study using pharmacy fill data, clinician use of Statin Choice during a medical encounter was associated with significantly greater patient adherence with statins up to 1 y later.Exposure to Statin Choice was associated with a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol over 1 y.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"272989X251346508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251346508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundStatin Choice is a shared decision-making encounter tool embedded in the electronic health record.ObjectiveTo describe the association between the use of Statin Choice, statin prescriptions by clinicians, prescription fills (primary adherence), and statin adherence at 12 mo (secondary adherence).DesignObservational cohort study at the Cleveland Clinic Health System.SubjectsStatin-naïve adults aged 40 to 75 y with a 10-y atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk of ≥5% and a primary care appointment between January 2020 and July 2021.Main MeasuresThe primary exposure was the use of Statin Choice during a clinical encounter. We measured whether the use of Statin Choice was associated with statin prescriptions. We measured statin adherence based on pharmacy fill data at 60 d (primary adherence) and 12 mo (secondary adherence). We used mixed-effects logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds of statin prescriptions and adherence at the 3 time points by the use of Statin Choice.Key ResultsAmong 17,001 statin-naïve patients, 13% viewed Statin Choice and 7% were prescribed a statin. The median ASCVD risk was 10%. Patients who were shown Statin Choice had 9.04 higher odds of being prescribed a statin compared with patients not shown Statin Choice (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.86-10.4). Among patients prescribed a statin, the use of Statin Choice was associated with 5.75 higher odds of primary adherence compared with usual care (95% CI: 4.22-7.83). At 12 mo, Statin Choice use was significantly associated with adherence in the unadjusted analysis (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.05-2.08) but was not significant after adjustment for patient factors. Patients shown Statin Choice had an average of 12 mg/dL reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 mo (95% CI: -16 mg/dL, -10) compared with those not shown Statin Choice.ConclusionIn this observational study, Statin Choice use was strongly associated with statin prescription and fills and weakly associated with adherence to statins for up to 1 y. A randomized trial is needed to confirm causality.HighlightsStatin Choice is an electronic health record-embedded shared decision-making encounter tool available for free in many health care systems.Small randomized controlled trials have found modest associations between the use of Statin Choice and statin adherence using patient-reported data.In our large study using pharmacy fill data, clinician use of Statin Choice during a medical encounter was associated with significantly greater patient adherence with statins up to 1 y later.Exposure to Statin Choice was associated with a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol over 1 y.

他汀类药物暴露选择与依从性之间的关系:一项观察性队列研究。
站点选择是嵌入在电子健康记录中的共享决策遭遇工具。目的描述他汀类药物选择、临床医生开具的他汀类药物处方、处方填充物(主要依从性)和12个月时他汀类药物依从性(次要依从性)之间的关系。设计:克利夫兰诊所卫生系统的观察性队列研究。SubjectsStatin-naïve年龄40至75岁,10岁动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险≥5%,在2020年1月至2021年7月期间接受初级保健预约的成年人。主要措施主要暴露是在临床遇到时使用他汀类药物。我们测量了他汀类药物选择的使用是否与他汀类药物处方有关。我们根据60天(主要依从性)和12个月(次要依从性)的药房填充数据测量他汀类药物依从性。我们使用混合效应逻辑回归来估计他汀类药物在3个时间点使用他汀类药物处方和依从性的调整几率。在17001例statin-naïve患者中,13%的患者选择了他汀类药物,7%的患者服用了他汀类药物。ASCVD的中位风险为10%。接受他汀类药物治疗的患者与未接受他汀类药物治疗的患者相比,接受他汀类药物治疗的几率高出9.04(95%可信区间[CI]: 7.86-10.4)。在服用他汀类药物的患者中,与常规治疗相比,选择他汀类药物与5.75高的原发性依从性相关(95% CI: 4.22-7.83)。在12个月时,未经调整的分析中,他汀类药物的使用与依从性显著相关(OR: 1.58;95% CI: 1.05-2.08),但在调整患者因素后无显著性差异。与没有选择他汀类药物的患者相比,选择他汀类药物的患者在12个月时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇平均降低了12mg /dL (95% CI: - 16mg /dL, -10)。结论:在这项观察性研究中,他汀类药物的选择性使用与他汀类药物的处方和填充剂密切相关,与坚持服用他汀类药物长达1年的相关性较弱。需要一项随机试验来证实因果关系。他汀选择是一个嵌入电子健康记录的共享决策遭遇工具,在许多卫生保健系统中免费提供。小型随机对照试验使用患者报告的数据发现他汀类药物选择与他汀类药物依从性之间存在适度的关联。在我们使用药房填充数据的大型研究中,临床医生在就诊期间使用他汀类药物选择与患者长达1年的他汀类药物依从性显著增加相关。选择他汀类药物与1年内低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的显著降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信