{"title":"Usages numériques pour l’exercice physique pendant et après le confinement. Une recherche à méthode mixte.","authors":"Gonzalo Marchant, Bastien Soulé, Natacha Heutte","doi":"10.3917/spub.252.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the reasons for using a digital exercise tool during lockdown, and change in this use after lockdown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed 196 individuals during and after lockdown. An online questionnaire collected quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data included closed-ended questions evaluating factors influencing the use of digital tools for exercising, digital tool usage, physical activity levels, and sitting time. The qualitative data comprised open-ended questions about the reasons for digital tool usage, taking a \"multiple-lives\" perspective by examining continuity, change of tool, discontinuous use, or stopping use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quantitative data showed that digital tool users were young adults with a high level of education. Half of these individuals used a digital tool for the first time during lockdown. Post-lockdown, about 82% of the participants stopped using digital tools. The perceived usefulness of these tools during the COVID-19 period was a key driver of usage. The qualitative data revealed that the primary reasons for using digital tools during lockdown were the need for expert advice and programs, and a lack of motivation for home-based exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The closure of sports facilities during lockdown produced a substantial shift toward the use of digital technologies for maintaining physical activity. However, as the lockdown measures were relaxed, usage of these technologies declined. This underscores the importance of further scrutinizing the quality and effectiveness of these tools, many of which are freely available, in order to ensure their suitability for public health and fitness programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 2","pages":"19-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.252.0019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the reasons for using a digital exercise tool during lockdown, and change in this use after lockdown.
Methods: This study followed 196 individuals during and after lockdown. An online questionnaire collected quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data included closed-ended questions evaluating factors influencing the use of digital tools for exercising, digital tool usage, physical activity levels, and sitting time. The qualitative data comprised open-ended questions about the reasons for digital tool usage, taking a "multiple-lives" perspective by examining continuity, change of tool, discontinuous use, or stopping use.
Results: The quantitative data showed that digital tool users were young adults with a high level of education. Half of these individuals used a digital tool for the first time during lockdown. Post-lockdown, about 82% of the participants stopped using digital tools. The perceived usefulness of these tools during the COVID-19 period was a key driver of usage. The qualitative data revealed that the primary reasons for using digital tools during lockdown were the need for expert advice and programs, and a lack of motivation for home-based exercise.
Conclusions: The closure of sports facilities during lockdown produced a substantial shift toward the use of digital technologies for maintaining physical activity. However, as the lockdown measures were relaxed, usage of these technologies declined. This underscores the importance of further scrutinizing the quality and effectiveness of these tools, many of which are freely available, in order to ensure their suitability for public health and fitness programs.
期刊介绍：
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
