{"title":"Future of diabetic foot risk: Unveiling predictive continuous glucose monitoring biomarkers.","authors":"Haewon Byeon","doi":"10.4239/wjd.v16.i6.107006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study critically analyzes the findings of Geng <i>et al</i>, which investigated the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and the risk of diabetic foot (DF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study demonstrated significant associations between lower time in range, higher glycemic risk index, mean blood glucose, and time above range and an increased risk of DF. While acknowledging the study's strengths, such as its large sample size and robust statistical methods, this analysis also highlights its limitations, including its cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported data. The findings are discussed within the framework of established theories, including the concepts of metabolic memory, the glucocentric paradigm, and the role of inflammation. This analysis emphasizes that a comprehensive approach to glucose management, extending beyond traditional glycated hemoglobin A1c measurements, is crucial for DF risk mitigation. Recognizing the impact of poor adherence and ongoing inflammation, future research should prioritize exploring causal mechanisms, the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving CGM metrics, and the specific contributions of glucose variability to DF development. In conclusion, these findings strongly support the clinical application of diverse CGM metrics to enhance patient outcomes and effectively manage the risk of DF.</p>","PeriodicalId":48607,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Diabetes","volume":"16 6","pages":"107006"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i6.107006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study critically analyzes the findings of Geng et al, which investigated the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and the risk of diabetic foot (DF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study demonstrated significant associations between lower time in range, higher glycemic risk index, mean blood glucose, and time above range and an increased risk of DF. While acknowledging the study's strengths, such as its large sample size and robust statistical methods, this analysis also highlights its limitations, including its cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported data. The findings are discussed within the framework of established theories, including the concepts of metabolic memory, the glucocentric paradigm, and the role of inflammation. This analysis emphasizes that a comprehensive approach to glucose management, extending beyond traditional glycated hemoglobin A1c measurements, is crucial for DF risk mitigation. Recognizing the impact of poor adherence and ongoing inflammation, future research should prioritize exploring causal mechanisms, the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving CGM metrics, and the specific contributions of glucose variability to DF development. In conclusion, these findings strongly support the clinical application of diverse CGM metrics to enhance patient outcomes and effectively manage the risk of DF.
期刊介绍:
The WJD is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJD is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of diabetes. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJD is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJD are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in diabetes. Scope: Diabetes Complications, Experimental Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes, Gestational, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Cardiomyopathies, Diabetic Coma, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Neuropathies, Donohue Syndrome, Fetal Macrosomia, and Prediabetic State.