Better Together Online: A Pilot Study of a Relationship Education Intervention with Rural Female Couples.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Professional Psychology-Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1037/pro0000610
Sharon S Rostosky, Sarah W Whitton, Zakary A Clements, Sarah Robbins
{"title":"<i>Better Together Online</i>: A Pilot Study of a Relationship Education Intervention with Rural Female Couples.","authors":"Sharon S Rostosky, Sarah W Whitton, Zakary A Clements, Sarah Robbins","doi":"10.1037/pro0000610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relationship education (RE) programs have demonstrated efficacy in helping couples to maintain and improve the quality of their relationships. Culturally appropriate and effective RE programs for same-sex couples, however, are scarce. We conducted a small pilot study of <i>Better Together Online</i>, a web-based seven-module RE program for rural female couples. Our aims were to examine acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the program and to explore preliminary evidence of efficacy. Eight female couples completed all modules and three additional couples completed at least four (<i>N</i> = 22 individuals). Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility ratings of each module were high and qualitative feedback from the couples included positive comments and some suggestions for improvement. Linear mixed-effects models indicated small effects on relationship instability at post-intervention (<i>g</i> =.27) and satisfaction at 3-month follow-up (<i>g</i> =.39); there were no effects on relationship confidence. Improvements in behavioral skills were more robust; there were small-to-medium effects on communication (<i>g</i> =.35-.56), problem solving (<i>g</i> =.23-.34), and mindfulness skills (<i>g</i> =.33-.64). and medium-to-large improvements in coping behaviors (<i>g</i> =.35-1.04). Small effects were also observed in increased stigma-related stress and positive identity. Some of these effects may have been influenced by unexpected arrival of COVID-19 during the intervention period. These preliminary results tentatively suggest that, with additional refinement and evaluation, <i>Better Together Online</i> may help maintain healthy relationships and prevent relationship distress and decline in rural female couples. Lesson learned and future directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48217,"journal":{"name":"Professional Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"56 2","pages":"119-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Psychology-Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relationship education (RE) programs have demonstrated efficacy in helping couples to maintain and improve the quality of their relationships. Culturally appropriate and effective RE programs for same-sex couples, however, are scarce. We conducted a small pilot study of Better Together Online, a web-based seven-module RE program for rural female couples. Our aims were to examine acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the program and to explore preliminary evidence of efficacy. Eight female couples completed all modules and three additional couples completed at least four (N = 22 individuals). Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility ratings of each module were high and qualitative feedback from the couples included positive comments and some suggestions for improvement. Linear mixed-effects models indicated small effects on relationship instability at post-intervention (g =.27) and satisfaction at 3-month follow-up (g =.39); there were no effects on relationship confidence. Improvements in behavioral skills were more robust; there were small-to-medium effects on communication (g =.35-.56), problem solving (g =.23-.34), and mindfulness skills (g =.33-.64). and medium-to-large improvements in coping behaviors (g =.35-1.04). Small effects were also observed in increased stigma-related stress and positive identity. Some of these effects may have been influenced by unexpected arrival of COVID-19 during the intervention period. These preliminary results tentatively suggest that, with additional refinement and evaluation, Better Together Online may help maintain healthy relationships and prevent relationship distress and decline in rural female couples. Lesson learned and future directions are discussed.

“更好的在线在一起”:农村女性夫妻关系教育干预的试点研究。
关系教育(RE)项目在帮助夫妻维持和改善他们的关系质量方面已经被证明是有效的。然而,针对同性伴侣的文化上合适且有效的RE项目却很少。我们开展了一项小型试点研究,这是一个面向农村女性夫妇的基于网络的七个模块的RE项目。我们的目的是检查该方案的可接受性、适当性和可行性,并探索其有效性的初步证据。8对女性夫妇完成了所有模块,另外3对夫妇完成了至少4个模块(N = 22个人)。每个模块的可接受性、适当性和可行性评分都很高,夫妻的定性反馈包括积极的评论和一些改进建议。线性混合效应模型显示,干预后关系不稳定性(g = 0.27)和3个月随访满意度(g = 0.39)的影响较小;对人际关系的信心没有影响。行为技能的提高更为显著;在沟通(g = 0.35 - 0.56)、解决问题(g = 0.23 - 0.34)和正念技能(g = 0.33 - 0.64)方面存在中小型影响。应对行为有中大型改善(g = 0.35 ~ 1.04)。在增加耻辱相关压力和积极认同方面也观察到小的影响。其中一些影响可能受到干预期间意外到来的COVID-19的影响。这些初步结果初步表明,通过进一步的完善和评估,“美好姻缘在线”可能有助于维持健康的关系,防止农村女性夫妻关系的困扰和下降。讨论了经验教训和未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Professional Psychology-Research and Practice
Professional Psychology-Research and Practice PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice® publishes articles on the application of psychology, including the scientific underpinnings of the profession of psychology. Articles that present assessment, treatment, and practice implications are encouraged. Both data-based and theoretical articles on techniques and practices used in the application of psychology are acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信