Uptake of virtual reality in outpatient hysteroscopy: a prospective observational study.

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Bibi Zeyah Fatemah Sairally, Lucy Davies, Paul P Smith, Siobhan O'Connor, Charlotte Yates, T Justin Clark
{"title":"Uptake of virtual reality in outpatient hysteroscopy: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Bibi Zeyah Fatemah Sairally, Lucy Davies, Paul P Smith, Siobhan O'Connor, Charlotte Yates, T Justin Clark","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.2025.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective cohort study evaluated virtual reality (VR) use during outpatient hysteroscopy in a UK tertiary hospital (Nov 2022-Apr 2023). Of 105 eligible women, 38 (36.2%) used VR; most who declined preferred to remain undistracted. Mean pain score was 5.5, slightly lower than the expected 5.7. Mild side effects included dizziness and claustrophobia. Nearly all users (94.7%) would recommend VR, and all rated it \"acceptable\" or \"very acceptable.\" While VR may improve patient experience, limited uptake highlights the importance of tailoring pain management to individual preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.2025.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This prospective cohort study evaluated virtual reality (VR) use during outpatient hysteroscopy in a UK tertiary hospital (Nov 2022-Apr 2023). Of 105 eligible women, 38 (36.2%) used VR; most who declined preferred to remain undistracted. Mean pain score was 5.5, slightly lower than the expected 5.7. Mild side effects included dizziness and claustrophobia. Nearly all users (94.7%) would recommend VR, and all rated it "acceptable" or "very acceptable." While VR may improve patient experience, limited uptake highlights the importance of tailoring pain management to individual preferences.

虚拟现实在门诊宫腔镜检查中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
这项前瞻性队列研究评估了虚拟现实(VR)在英国一家三级医院门诊宫腔镜检查中的应用(2022年11月至2023年4月)。在105名符合条件的女性中,38名(36.2%)使用了VR;大多数拒绝的人更愿意保持冷静。平均疼痛评分为5.5,略低于预期的5.7分。轻微的副作用包括头晕和幽闭恐惧症。几乎所有的用户(94.7%)都会推荐VR,所有人都认为VR“可以接受”或“非常可以接受”。虽然虚拟现实可以改善患者的体验,但有限的吸收突出了根据个人喜好定制疼痛管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信