Assessment of lens absorbed dose by radiological technologists during mobile X-ray radiography: a comparison between computed radiography and flat panel detector systems.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Satoe Konta, Saya Ohno, Ryota Shindo, Keisuke Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Haga, Toshiki Kato, Masahiro Sota, Yuji Kaga, Mitsuya Abe, Koichi Chida
{"title":"Assessment of lens absorbed dose by radiological technologists during mobile X-ray radiography: a comparison between computed radiography and flat panel detector systems.","authors":"Satoe Konta, Saya Ohno, Ryota Shindo, Keisuke Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Haga, Toshiki Kato, Masahiro Sota, Yuji Kaga, Mitsuya Abe, Koichi Chida","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00930-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mobile X-ray radiography is crucial for imaging patients with limited mobility; however, radiological technologists (RTs) may be positioned closer to patients and thus be at risk of harmful radiation doses owing to scattered radiation. As X-ray systems transitioned from digital computed radiography (CR) to flat panel detector (FPD) systems, we studied the RTs' eye lens and neck radiation doses over 2 years. Three RTs participated in measurements using a CR system, and five RTs participated in measurements using a FPD system. We measured radiation exposure with neck dosimeters (glass badges) and lens dosimeters (DOSIRIS®). The results showed a 66% reduction in lens dose after switching from the CR system to the FPD system. Comparisons of specific RT members also revealed significantly lower doses for the FPD system than for the CR system. Two main factors contributed to this decrease: the FPD system used a virtual grid instead of a scatter removal grid, and the RTs' awareness of radiation exposure increased with experience. Although the lens dose was significantly reduced, RTs should still wear protective eyewear and equipment when frequent imaging is expected or when working close to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00930-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile X-ray radiography is crucial for imaging patients with limited mobility; however, radiological technologists (RTs) may be positioned closer to patients and thus be at risk of harmful radiation doses owing to scattered radiation. As X-ray systems transitioned from digital computed radiography (CR) to flat panel detector (FPD) systems, we studied the RTs' eye lens and neck radiation doses over 2 years. Three RTs participated in measurements using a CR system, and five RTs participated in measurements using a FPD system. We measured radiation exposure with neck dosimeters (glass badges) and lens dosimeters (DOSIRIS®). The results showed a 66% reduction in lens dose after switching from the CR system to the FPD system. Comparisons of specific RT members also revealed significantly lower doses for the FPD system than for the CR system. Two main factors contributed to this decrease: the FPD system used a virtual grid instead of a scatter removal grid, and the RTs' awareness of radiation exposure increased with experience. Although the lens dose was significantly reduced, RTs should still wear protective eyewear and equipment when frequent imaging is expected or when working close to patients.

移动x射线照相时放射技术人员对透镜吸收剂量的评估:计算机x射线照相与平板探测器系统的比较。
移动x线摄影对活动受限的患者成像至关重要;然而,放射技术人员的位置可能离病人更近,因此由于散射辐射而面临有害辐射剂量的风险。随着x射线系统从数字计算机放射照相(CR)过渡到平板探测器(FPD)系统,我们研究了RTs在2年内的眼晶体和颈部辐射剂量。3名RTs使用CR系统参与测量,5名RTs使用FPD系统参与测量。我们使用颈部剂量计(玻璃胸牌)和透镜剂量计(DOSIRIS®)测量辐射暴露。结果显示,从CR系统切换到FPD系统后,透镜剂量减少了66%。对特定RT成员的比较也显示FPD系统的剂量明显低于CR系统。两个主要因素导致了这种下降:FPD系统使用虚拟网格而不是分散去除网格,RTs对辐射暴露的意识随着经验的增加而增加。尽管晶状体剂量显著降低,但当需要频繁成像或在患者附近工作时,转诊医生仍应佩戴防护眼镜和设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信