Abdul Haseeb, Fabiha Athar, Hussain Abbas, Najia Sadiq, Faiza Naz, Erum Siddiqui, Osaid Ahmed, Umer Wamiq, Syed Ahmed Abbas Wasi, Hafsa Shuja, Bilal Aheed, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Amna Sohail
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Biological Agents in Giant Cell Arteritis: An Updated Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abdul Haseeb, Fabiha Athar, Hussain Abbas, Najia Sadiq, Faiza Naz, Erum Siddiqui, Osaid Ahmed, Umer Wamiq, Syed Ahmed Abbas Wasi, Hafsa Shuja, Bilal Aheed, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Amna Sohail","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Giant cell arteritis (GCA), impacting individuals over 50, causes vision loss, headaches, and jaw pain due to inflammation from proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors. Standard treatment involves glucocorticoids, with tocilizumab and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors currently being studied.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, included adult GCA patients treated with biological agents. The search covered PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus until October 2023, excluding nonhuman, pediatric, non-English, and nonrandomized studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4, with random effects models calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A meta-analysis of 11 studies ( <i>n</i> = 924) demonstrated higher remission rates with biological agents (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.17-5.71; <i>p</i> = 0.02; <i>I</i> <sup>2 </sup> = 70%), especially tocilizumab (OR = 4.30, 95% CI: 1.22-15.21; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Nonsignificant trends favored biological agents for relapse rates (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.26-1.05; <i>p</i> = 0.07) and control for adverse effects (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-1.02; <i>p</i> = 0.07). However, TNF inhibitors were linked to increased infection rates (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.17-4.96; <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tocilizumab effectively induces remission in GCA patients, while abatacept and TNF inhibitors offer minimal benefits with increased infection risks, according to this meta-analysis. Treatment decisions should consider these factors, and larger studies are necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biological agents in managing GCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"64-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA), impacting individuals over 50, causes vision loss, headaches, and jaw pain due to inflammation from proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors. Standard treatment involves glucocorticoids, with tocilizumab and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors currently being studied.
Method: This meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, included adult GCA patients treated with biological agents. The search covered PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus until October 2023, excluding nonhuman, pediatric, non-English, and nonrandomized studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4, with random effects models calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Result: A meta-analysis of 11 studies ( n = 924) demonstrated higher remission rates with biological agents (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.17-5.71; p = 0.02; I2 = 70%), especially tocilizumab (OR = 4.30, 95% CI: 1.22-15.21; p = 0.02). Nonsignificant trends favored biological agents for relapse rates (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.26-1.05; p = 0.07) and control for adverse effects (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-1.02; p = 0.07). However, TNF inhibitors were linked to increased infection rates (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.17-4.96; p = 0.02).
Conclusion: Tocilizumab effectively induces remission in GCA patients, while abatacept and TNF inhibitors offer minimal benefits with increased infection risks, according to this meta-analysis. Treatment decisions should consider these factors, and larger studies are necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biological agents in managing GCA.