Efficacy and Safety of Biological Agents in Giant Cell Arteritis: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Avicenna Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-19 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1809621
Abdul Haseeb, Fabiha Athar, Hussain Abbas, Najia Sadiq, Faiza Naz, Erum Siddiqui, Osaid Ahmed, Umer Wamiq, Syed Ahmed Abbas Wasi, Hafsa Shuja, Bilal Aheed, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Amna Sohail
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Biological Agents in Giant Cell Arteritis: An Updated Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abdul Haseeb, Fabiha Athar, Hussain Abbas, Najia Sadiq, Faiza Naz, Erum Siddiqui, Osaid Ahmed, Umer Wamiq, Syed Ahmed Abbas Wasi, Hafsa Shuja, Bilal Aheed, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Amna Sohail","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Giant cell arteritis (GCA), impacting individuals over 50, causes vision loss, headaches, and jaw pain due to inflammation from proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors. Standard treatment involves glucocorticoids, with tocilizumab and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors currently being studied.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, included adult GCA patients treated with biological agents. The search covered PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus until October 2023, excluding nonhuman, pediatric, non-English, and nonrandomized studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4, with random effects models calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A meta-analysis of 11 studies ( <i>n</i>  = 924) demonstrated higher remission rates with biological agents (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.17-5.71; <i>p</i>  = 0.02; <i>I</i> <sup>2 </sup> = 70%), especially tocilizumab (OR = 4.30, 95% CI: 1.22-15.21; <i>p</i>  = 0.02). Nonsignificant trends favored biological agents for relapse rates (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.26-1.05; <i>p</i>  = 0.07) and control for adverse effects (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-1.02; <i>p</i>  = 0.07). However, TNF inhibitors were linked to increased infection rates (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.17-4.96; <i>p</i>  = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tocilizumab effectively induces remission in GCA patients, while abatacept and TNF inhibitors offer minimal benefits with increased infection risks, according to this meta-analysis. Treatment decisions should consider these factors, and larger studies are necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biological agents in managing GCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"64-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA), impacting individuals over 50, causes vision loss, headaches, and jaw pain due to inflammation from proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors. Standard treatment involves glucocorticoids, with tocilizumab and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors currently being studied.

Method: This meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, included adult GCA patients treated with biological agents. The search covered PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus until October 2023, excluding nonhuman, pediatric, non-English, and nonrandomized studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4, with random effects models calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Result: A meta-analysis of 11 studies ( n  = 924) demonstrated higher remission rates with biological agents (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.17-5.71; p  = 0.02; I 2  = 70%), especially tocilizumab (OR = 4.30, 95% CI: 1.22-15.21; p  = 0.02). Nonsignificant trends favored biological agents for relapse rates (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.26-1.05; p  = 0.07) and control for adverse effects (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-1.02; p  = 0.07). However, TNF inhibitors were linked to increased infection rates (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.17-4.96; p  = 0.02).

Conclusion: Tocilizumab effectively induces remission in GCA patients, while abatacept and TNF inhibitors offer minimal benefits with increased infection risks, according to this meta-analysis. Treatment decisions should consider these factors, and larger studies are necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biological agents in managing GCA.

生物制剂治疗巨细胞动脉炎的疗效和安全性:一项最新荟萃分析。
背景:巨细胞动脉炎(GCA),影响50岁以上的人群,由于促炎细胞因子和生长因子的炎症导致视力下降,头痛和下颌疼痛。标准治疗包括糖皮质激素,目前正在研究tocilizumab和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂。方法:本荟萃分析遵循流行病学指南中系统评价、荟萃分析和观察性研究荟萃分析的首选报告项目,纳入了接受生物制剂治疗的成人GCA患者。截至2023年10月,检索涵盖PubMed、Medline、Embase和Scopus,不包括非人类、儿科、非英语和非随机研究。使用Review Manager 5.4对数据进行分析,随机效应模型计算比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:11项研究(n = 924)的荟萃分析显示,生物制剂的缓解率更高(OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.17-5.71;P = 0.02;I 2 = 70%),尤其是托珠单抗(OR = 4.30, 95% CI: 1.22-15.21;P = 0.02)。对于复发率,非显著趋势倾向于生物制剂(OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.26-1.05;p = 0.07)和不良反应对照(OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-1.02;P = 0.07)。然而,TNF抑制剂与感染率增加有关(OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.17-4.96;P = 0.02)。结论:根据这项荟萃分析,Tocilizumab可有效诱导GCA患者缓解,而阿巴接受和TNF抑制剂对感染风险增加的益处最小。治疗决策应考虑这些因素,需要更大规模的研究来评估生物制剂治疗GCA的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信