A systematic review assessing the significance of Body Mass Index as a contributing factor of outcomes in patients undergoing complex robotic pancreatic resections.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Garnet Vanterpool, Kristina Milivojev Covilo, Sharona B Ross
{"title":"A systematic review assessing the significance of Body Mass Index as a contributing factor of outcomes in patients undergoing complex robotic pancreatic resections.","authors":"Garnet Vanterpool, Kristina Milivojev Covilo, Sharona B Ross","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10806-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic surgeries can be regarded as the most complex and high-risk procedures, with robotic approaches offering improved outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Articles published from 2000 to 2024 were sourced from PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant keywords, with inclusion criteria focusing on robotic procedures involving at least 30 patients and BMI classification. Studies using non-robotic approaches were excluded unless used for comparison. Of 17,187 articles identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was minimized through dual independent reviewers, adhering to the PRISMA checklist.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Overall, 4645 patients (1501 RPD and 3144 RDP cases) were analyzed and highlighted some BMI-associated challenges, including longer operative times and increased postoperative complications in obese patients. However, robotic techniques were found to mitigate some of these issues, demonstrating reduced blood loss, lower conversion rates, and faster recovery compared to open or laparoscopic methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results showed that robotic approaches improved surgical safety and efficacy, even in patients with BMI >25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, supporting their use in high-risk populations. Despite limited available studies, findings highlight the need for further research on BMI's influence in robotic pancreatic surgeries to optimize patient outcomes and refine clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10806-X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic surgeries can be regarded as the most complex and high-risk procedures, with robotic approaches offering improved outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP).

Evidence acquisition: Articles published from 2000 to 2024 were sourced from PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant keywords, with inclusion criteria focusing on robotic procedures involving at least 30 patients and BMI classification. Studies using non-robotic approaches were excluded unless used for comparison. Of 17,187 articles identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was minimized through dual independent reviewers, adhering to the PRISMA checklist.

Evidence synthesis: Overall, 4645 patients (1501 RPD and 3144 RDP cases) were analyzed and highlighted some BMI-associated challenges, including longer operative times and increased postoperative complications in obese patients. However, robotic techniques were found to mitigate some of these issues, demonstrating reduced blood loss, lower conversion rates, and faster recovery compared to open or laparoscopic methods.

Conclusions: Results showed that robotic approaches improved surgical safety and efficacy, even in patients with BMI >25 kg/m2, supporting their use in high-risk populations. Despite limited available studies, findings highlight the need for further research on BMI's influence in robotic pancreatic surgeries to optimize patient outcomes and refine clinical practices.

一项评估体重指数作为复杂机器人胰腺切除术患者预后影响因素重要性的系统综述。
胰腺手术被认为是最复杂和高风险的手术,机器人方法提供了更好的结果。本系统综述旨在评估身体质量指数(BMI)对机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)和机器人远端胰腺切除术(RDP)围手术期预后的影响。证据获取:2000年至2024年发表的文章来自PubMed和b谷歌Scholar,使用相关关键词,纳入标准集中在涉及至少30名患者的机器人手术和BMI分类。使用非机器人方法的研究被排除,除非用于比较。在确定的17,187篇文章中,有11篇符合纳入标准。通过双重独立审稿人,遵循PRISMA检查表,将偏倚风险降至最低。证据综合:总共分析了4645例患者(1501例RPD和3144例RDP),并强调了一些与bmi相关的挑战,包括肥胖患者手术时间延长和术后并发症增加。然而,与开放或腹腔镜手术相比,机器人技术可以减轻这些问题,减少失血,降低转换率,更快恢复。结论:结果表明,机器人入路提高了手术的安全性和有效性,即使在BMI为bb0 25 kg/m2的患者中也是如此,支持在高危人群中使用机器人入路。尽管现有的研究有限,但研究结果强调需要进一步研究BMI在机器人胰腺手术中的影响,以优化患者预后并改进临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Surgery
Minerva Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
320
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信