Jiye Park, Yo Huh, Seoyoung Song, Sora Kim, Jayoung Yoo, Kyoungwon Jung, Donghwan Choi
{"title":"Undertriage of Severe Geriatric Trauma Patients: Who Are We Missing?","authors":"Jiye Park, Yo Huh, Seoyoung Song, Sora Kim, Jayoung Yoo, Kyoungwon Jung, Donghwan Choi","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2024.0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Geriatric trauma patients have unique risk factors for being undertriaged, which differ from those in young trauma patients. This study aimed to identify these risk factors and their implications for public health stakeholders and trauma surgeons to improve prehospital triage of geriatric trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively reviewed from single level-1 trauma center database in patients aged ≥65 years, with Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15 between 2016 and 2020. Pre-hospital and hospital factors were compared between correctly triaged and undertriaged patients. The probabilities of survival and outcomes for correct and undertriage were calculated using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), observed (O):expected (E) ratio, z-score, and w-score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 512 patients were included in the study; 401 (78%) were correctly triaged and 111 (22%) were undertriaged. Correct triage group presented significant z-score (correct triage: 4.29 vs. undertriage: -0.11), w-score (correct triage: 7.79 vs. undertriage: 4.29), and O:E ratio of mortality (correct triage: 0.73 vs. undertriage: 1.66). Undertriaged patients were older (77 [72-82] vs. 73 [68-80], <i>p</i><0.001), had a higher women proportion (53% vs. 34%, <i>p</i><0.001), had lower ISS (25 [17-25] vs. 27 [19-38], <i>p</i><0.001), and had more head and neck injuries (89% vs. 65%, <i>p</i><0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, female sex (odds ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval [1.07-6.09], <i>p</i>=0.034), ground fall injury (5.82 [1.89-17.91], <i>p</i>=0.002), prehospital systolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg (0.13 [0.03-0.67], <i>p</i>=0.003), and presence of cerebrovascular disease (5.53 [1.35-22.68], <i>p</i>=0.018) were significantly associated with undertriage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Geriatric trauma patients were undertriaged when they were women, sustained ground-level fall injuries, the more alert in the scene, and had cerebrovascular disease. Trauma surgeons and fire agency stakeholders should collaborate to create geriatric-specific triage guidelines and educate paramedics about these risk factors to prevent undertriage in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 7","pages":"438-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Geriatric trauma patients have unique risk factors for being undertriaged, which differ from those in young trauma patients. This study aimed to identify these risk factors and their implications for public health stakeholders and trauma surgeons to improve prehospital triage of geriatric trauma patients.
Materials and methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed from single level-1 trauma center database in patients aged ≥65 years, with Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15 between 2016 and 2020. Pre-hospital and hospital factors were compared between correctly triaged and undertriaged patients. The probabilities of survival and outcomes for correct and undertriage were calculated using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), observed (O):expected (E) ratio, z-score, and w-score.
Results: A total of 512 patients were included in the study; 401 (78%) were correctly triaged and 111 (22%) were undertriaged. Correct triage group presented significant z-score (correct triage: 4.29 vs. undertriage: -0.11), w-score (correct triage: 7.79 vs. undertriage: 4.29), and O:E ratio of mortality (correct triage: 0.73 vs. undertriage: 1.66). Undertriaged patients were older (77 [72-82] vs. 73 [68-80], p<0.001), had a higher women proportion (53% vs. 34%, p<0.001), had lower ISS (25 [17-25] vs. 27 [19-38], p<0.001), and had more head and neck injuries (89% vs. 65%, p<0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, female sex (odds ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval [1.07-6.09], p=0.034), ground fall injury (5.82 [1.89-17.91], p=0.002), prehospital systolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg (0.13 [0.03-0.67], p=0.003), and presence of cerebrovascular disease (5.53 [1.35-22.68], p=0.018) were significantly associated with undertriage.
Conclusion: Geriatric trauma patients were undertriaged when they were women, sustained ground-level fall injuries, the more alert in the scene, and had cerebrovascular disease. Trauma surgeons and fire agency stakeholders should collaborate to create geriatric-specific triage guidelines and educate paramedics about these risk factors to prevent undertriage in this patient population.
目的:老年创伤患者与青年创伤患者相比,有其独特的危险因素。本研究旨在确定这些危险因素及其对公共卫生利益相关者和创伤外科医生的影响,以改善老年创伤患者的院前分诊。材料和方法:回顾性分析2016年至2020年间年龄≥65岁、损伤严重程度评分(ISS) bbb15的单一一级创伤中心数据库中的数据。对分诊正确与分诊不足患者院前、院内因素进行比较。使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)、观察(O):预期(E)比、z-score和w-score计算正确和不足分类的生存概率和结果。结果:共纳入512例患者;401例(78%)分诊正确,111例(22%)分诊不足。正确分类组的z-score(正确分类:4.29 vs. undertriage: -0.11)、w-score(正确分类:7.79 vs. undertriage: 4.29)和O:E死亡率比(正确分类:0.73 vs. undertriage: 1.66)均具有显著性。分诊不足的患者年龄较大(77例[72-82]对73例[68-80],ppppp=0.034)、地面摔伤(5.82例[1.89-17.91],p=0.002)、院前收缩压p=0.003)、存在脑血管疾病(5.53例[1.35-22.68],p=0.018)与分诊不足显著相关。结论:老年外伤患者中女性、持续地面坠落伤、现场警觉性较强、有脑血管疾病者分诊较差。创伤外科医生和消防部门的利益相关者应该合作制定针对老年人的分诊指南,并教育护理人员这些风险因素,以防止这一患者群体的分诊不足。
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.