Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adults with acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-06-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001691
Mary L Forte, Sallee Brandt, Amy Marie Claussen, Christopher J Tignanelli, Surbhi Shah, Mary Butler
{"title":"Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adults with acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.","authors":"Mary L Forte, Sallee Brandt, Amy Marie Claussen, Christopher J Tignanelli, Surbhi Shah, Mary Butler","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing and type of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis (VTEp) for adults with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unknown. This systematic review synthesized evidence on the timing and type of VTEp in adults with TBI and highlights evidence gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through November 4, 2024 for English language, randomized or non-randomized studies with a comparator that reported VTEp timing or agent in adults with acute TBI, and reported intracranial hemorrhage progression (ICHP), VTE, pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), neurosurgical intervention (NSI), adverse events (AEs), length of stay (LOS), function, or mortality. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed with ROBINS-I as low, moderate, serious, or critical risk in studies that used advanced analytic methods (AAMs) to control selection bias; all other studies were deemed critical risk. We qualitatively synthesized evidence and focused text reporting on studies with AAM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 738 citations, 21 non-randomized studies met criteria (1 moderate, 20 critical ROB): 16 on VTEp timing, 7 on agents. Seven studies used AAM. For VTEp timing (five AAM studies), one study of adults with mostly mild TBI found no significant difference between Early and Late VTEp on ICHP (moderate ROB); no timing studies with AAM reported ICHP for adults with moderate or severe TBI. Findings were mixed for VTE timing on NSI and PE. Early VTEp was associated with fewer DVTs. There was no difference in mortality or serious AEs by VTEp timing. For VTEp agents, three studies with AAM found no significant difference between low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UH) on ICHP, PE, DVT, and serious or overall AEs. Results were mixed for LMWH versus UH effects on NSI after VTEp, VTE, LOS and mortality. TBI severity labeling varied across studies and within measures, reducing comparability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical evidence on the timing and type of VTEp for adults with acute TBI is of insufficient quality for clinical decision-making. Prospective research designs, standardization of TBI severity labeling, and improved reporting of interventions and outcomes would advance the field.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023421534.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Systematic Review, Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"e001691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing and type of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis (VTEp) for adults with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unknown. This systematic review synthesized evidence on the timing and type of VTEp in adults with TBI and highlights evidence gaps.

Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through November 4, 2024 for English language, randomized or non-randomized studies with a comparator that reported VTEp timing or agent in adults with acute TBI, and reported intracranial hemorrhage progression (ICHP), VTE, pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), neurosurgical intervention (NSI), adverse events (AEs), length of stay (LOS), function, or mortality. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed with ROBINS-I as low, moderate, serious, or critical risk in studies that used advanced analytic methods (AAMs) to control selection bias; all other studies were deemed critical risk. We qualitatively synthesized evidence and focused text reporting on studies with AAM.

Results: From 738 citations, 21 non-randomized studies met criteria (1 moderate, 20 critical ROB): 16 on VTEp timing, 7 on agents. Seven studies used AAM. For VTEp timing (five AAM studies), one study of adults with mostly mild TBI found no significant difference between Early and Late VTEp on ICHP (moderate ROB); no timing studies with AAM reported ICHP for adults with moderate or severe TBI. Findings were mixed for VTE timing on NSI and PE. Early VTEp was associated with fewer DVTs. There was no difference in mortality or serious AEs by VTEp timing. For VTEp agents, three studies with AAM found no significant difference between low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UH) on ICHP, PE, DVT, and serious or overall AEs. Results were mixed for LMWH versus UH effects on NSI after VTEp, VTE, LOS and mortality. TBI severity labeling varied across studies and within measures, reducing comparability.

Conclusions: Clinical evidence on the timing and type of VTEp for adults with acute TBI is of insufficient quality for clinical decision-making. Prospective research designs, standardization of TBI severity labeling, and improved reporting of interventions and outcomes would advance the field.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023421534.

Level of evidence: Systematic Review, Level IV.

静脉血栓栓塞预防成人急性外伤性脑损伤:系统回顾。
背景:成人急性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者静脉血栓栓塞化学预防(VTEp)的最佳时机和类型尚不清楚。本系统综述综合了创伤性脑损伤成人VTEp发生时间和类型的证据,并强调了证据差距。方法:我们检索了Ovid MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane Library,检索截止到2024年11月4日的英文、随机或非随机研究,这些研究使用比较器报道了急性TBI成人患者的VTEp时间或药物,并报告了颅内出血进展(ICHP)、VTE、肺栓塞(PE)、深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、神经外科干预(NSI)、不良事件(ae)、住院时间(LOS)、功能或死亡率。在使用先进分析方法(AAMs)控制选择偏倚的研究中,用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险(ROB)为低、中度、严重或严重风险;所有其他研究都被认为有严重风险。我们定性地合成证据,并将重点放在AAM研究的文本报告上。结果:在738篇引用中,21项非随机研究符合标准(1项中度ROB, 20项临界ROB): 16项关于VTEp时间,7项关于药物。7项研究使用AAM。对于VTEp时间(五项AAM研究),一项研究发现,大多数轻度TBI的成人在ICHP(中度ROB)上早期和晚期VTEp没有显著差异;没有针对中度或重度TBI成人的AAM时间研究报道ICHP。对于NSI和PE的VTE时间,结果是混合的。早期VTEp与较少的dvt相关。VTEp时间对死亡率和严重ae没有影响。对于VTEp药物,三项AAM研究发现低分子量肝素(LMWH)和未分级肝素(UH)在ICHP、PE、DVT和严重或整体ae方面无显著差异。低分子肝素与UH对VTEp、VTE、LOS和死亡率后NSI的影响结果不一。TBI严重程度标签在不同的研究和测量范围内有所不同,降低了可比性。结论:关于成人急性脑外伤患者VTEp的时间和类型的临床证据质量不足,无法用于临床决策。前瞻性研究设计、TBI严重程度标记的标准化以及改进的干预措施和结果报告将推动该领域的发展。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42023421534。证据等级:系统评价,四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信