Optimal Allocation of Observations in Stepped-Wedge and Other Cluster Studies With Correlated Cluster-Period Effects.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Alan J Girling, Samuel I Watson
{"title":"Optimal Allocation of Observations in Stepped-Wedge and Other Cluster Studies With Correlated Cluster-Period Effects.","authors":"Alan J Girling, Samuel I Watson","doi":"10.1002/sim.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stepped-wedge studies usually entail regular sampling of clusters over time. Yet the precision of the treatment effect estimator can sometimes be improved if the regular sampling scheme is replaced by one with preferential allocation of observations to particular time-epochs within each cluster. We present some exact results for optimizing the allocation for a general experimental layout under a mixed effects model with a time-varying cluster-autocorrelation structure, together with an algorithm for generating optimal allocations. An index of cluster variation is introduced, an increasing function of both the intra-class correlation and the total sample size, which encapsulates the influence of cluster-level variation on the optimal allocation. For any specified layout there is a sampling scheme (the 'best natural allocation') that solves the optimization problem for all values of this index up to a threshold value which depends only on the cluster autocorrelations. Under such a scheme the treatment effect estimator is equal to a simple difference between the means of the treated and control observations. Best natural allocations stand alongside conventional parallel and cross-over designs in giving equal weight to observations from all participants, even under stepped-wedge layouts with irreversible interventions. When applied to a recent study of primary care training programmes in low- and middle- income countries (The REaCH study), the results lead to substantial reductions in total sample size, without loss of precision. For stepped-wedge layouts with block-exchangeable or time-decaying cluster autocorrelations, we present explicit conditions for the optimality of staircase-type sampling schemes, which can arise as best natural allocations in such cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 13-14","pages":"e70100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stepped-wedge studies usually entail regular sampling of clusters over time. Yet the precision of the treatment effect estimator can sometimes be improved if the regular sampling scheme is replaced by one with preferential allocation of observations to particular time-epochs within each cluster. We present some exact results for optimizing the allocation for a general experimental layout under a mixed effects model with a time-varying cluster-autocorrelation structure, together with an algorithm for generating optimal allocations. An index of cluster variation is introduced, an increasing function of both the intra-class correlation and the total sample size, which encapsulates the influence of cluster-level variation on the optimal allocation. For any specified layout there is a sampling scheme (the 'best natural allocation') that solves the optimization problem for all values of this index up to a threshold value which depends only on the cluster autocorrelations. Under such a scheme the treatment effect estimator is equal to a simple difference between the means of the treated and control observations. Best natural allocations stand alongside conventional parallel and cross-over designs in giving equal weight to observations from all participants, even under stepped-wedge layouts with irreversible interventions. When applied to a recent study of primary care training programmes in low- and middle- income countries (The REaCH study), the results lead to substantial reductions in total sample size, without loss of precision. For stepped-wedge layouts with block-exchangeable or time-decaying cluster autocorrelations, we present explicit conditions for the optimality of staircase-type sampling schemes, which can arise as best natural allocations in such cases.

具有相关聚类周期效应的阶梯楔形和其他聚类研究中观测值的最优分配。
阶梯形研究通常需要在一段时间内对集群进行定期抽样。然而,如果将常规抽样方案替换为优先分配观测值到每个簇内特定时间点的抽样方案,有时可以提高处理效果估计器的精度。在具有时变聚类自相关结构的混合效应模型下,我们给出了一些优化一般实验布局的精确结果,以及生成最优分配的算法。引入聚类变化指数,即类内相关性和总样本量的递增函数,它概括了聚类水平变化对最优分配的影响。对于任何指定的布局,都有一个采样方案(“最佳自然分配”)来解决这个索引的所有值的优化问题,直到一个阈值,这个阈值只取决于簇的自相关性。在这种方案下,处理效果估计量等于处理后的观测值和对照观测值的均值之间的简单差值。最佳自然分配与传统的平行和交叉设计一样,对所有参与者的观察结果给予同等的重视,即使是在不可逆干预的楔形布局下。当应用于最近对低收入和中等收入国家初级保健培训规划的研究(REaCH研究)时,结果导致总样本量大幅减少,而没有失去精度。对于具有块可交换或时间衰减聚类自相关的阶梯形布局,我们给出了阶梯型采样方案的最优性的明确条件,在这种情况下,它可以作为最佳自然分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信