Exploring Providers' Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences on the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Endothelin Receptor Antagonist (ERA) + Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors (PDE5i).

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pulmonary Circulation Pub Date : 2025-06-22 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/pul2.70113
Nicholas A Kolaitis, Martha Kingman, Melisa Wilson, Gabriela Gomez Rendon, David Lopez, Carly J Paoli, Mohammad Rahman, Ashley Martin, November McGarvey, Abraham Lee, Lana Melendres-Groves
{"title":"Exploring Providers' Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences on the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Endothelin Receptor Antagonist (ERA) + Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors (PDE5i).","authors":"Nicholas A Kolaitis, Martha Kingman, Melisa Wilson, Gabriela Gomez Rendon, David Lopez, Carly J Paoli, Mohammad Rahman, Ashley Martin, November McGarvey, Abraham Lee, Lana Melendres-Groves","doi":"10.1002/pul2.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to understand healthcare providers' (HCPs) decision to adopt double combination therapy with ERA + PDE5i for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and to explore whether a single tablet combination therapy (STCT) might increase adoption practices. 195 US HCPs completed a survey evaluating their PAH treatment preferences. HCPs' willingness to use double combination ERA + PDE5i was assessed using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The sample predominantly included physicians (73.3%) from centers of excellence (63.1%), with a mean of 117.4 PAH patients treated in the past year. Key factors influencing ERA + PDE5i adoption in the DCE were the patient's current treatment (17.9), PAH etiology (16.2), existing comorbidities (14.1), and history of side effects (12.7), with higher scores indicating stronger preference. HCPs were more likely to select ERA + PDE5i for patients currently on PDE5i monotherapy, with idiopathic PAH, and without comorbidities or a history of side effects. Regarding STCT, most HCPs reported that it would allow them to initiate ERA + PDE5i sooner (76.4%) and improve patient compliance (82.6%). However, concerns regarding cost/insurance issues (63.6%) and a history of side effects (50.8%) were identified as limitations to adopting STCT. Patients' current therapy, the cause of PAH, comorbidities, and side effects are key factors influencing whether US providers are willing to treat them with ERA + PDE5i. Providers perceive that STCT may help HCPs initiate ERA + PDE5i sooner, improve compliance, and simplify initiation of upfront double therapy and delivery of triple therapy. Addressing cost and insurance barriers will be critical to realizing these potential benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":"15 2","pages":"e70113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to understand healthcare providers' (HCPs) decision to adopt double combination therapy with ERA + PDE5i for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and to explore whether a single tablet combination therapy (STCT) might increase adoption practices. 195 US HCPs completed a survey evaluating their PAH treatment preferences. HCPs' willingness to use double combination ERA + PDE5i was assessed using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The sample predominantly included physicians (73.3%) from centers of excellence (63.1%), with a mean of 117.4 PAH patients treated in the past year. Key factors influencing ERA + PDE5i adoption in the DCE were the patient's current treatment (17.9), PAH etiology (16.2), existing comorbidities (14.1), and history of side effects (12.7), with higher scores indicating stronger preference. HCPs were more likely to select ERA + PDE5i for patients currently on PDE5i monotherapy, with idiopathic PAH, and without comorbidities or a history of side effects. Regarding STCT, most HCPs reported that it would allow them to initiate ERA + PDE5i sooner (76.4%) and improve patient compliance (82.6%). However, concerns regarding cost/insurance issues (63.6%) and a history of side effects (50.8%) were identified as limitations to adopting STCT. Patients' current therapy, the cause of PAH, comorbidities, and side effects are key factors influencing whether US providers are willing to treat them with ERA + PDE5i. Providers perceive that STCT may help HCPs initiate ERA + PDE5i sooner, improve compliance, and simplify initiation of upfront double therapy and delivery of triple therapy. Addressing cost and insurance barriers will be critical to realizing these potential benefits.

探讨提供者对内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA) +磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂(PDE5i)治疗肺动脉高压的行为、态度和偏好
本研究旨在了解医疗保健提供者(HCPs)采用ERA + PDE5i双联合治疗肺动脉高压(PAH)的决定,并探讨单片联合治疗(STCT)是否可能增加采用做法。195名美国医护人员完成了一项评估他们对多环芳烃治疗偏好的调查。采用离散选择实验(DCE)评估HCPs使用ERA + PDE5i双组合的意愿。样本主要包括来自卓越中心(63.1%)的医生(73.3%),过去一年平均有117.4名PAH患者接受治疗。影响DCE采用ERA + PDE5i的关键因素是患者当前治疗情况(17.9分)、PAH病因(16.2分)、存在合并症(14.1分)和不良反应史(12.7分),得分越高表明偏好越强。对于目前正在接受PDE5i单药治疗、患有特发性PAH且无合并症或副作用史的患者,HCPs更有可能选择ERA + PDE5i。关于STCT,大多数HCPs报告说,这将使他们能够更快地启动ERA + PDE5i(76.4%),并提高患者的依从性(82.6%)。然而,成本/保险问题(63.6%)和副作用史(50.8%)被认为是采用STCT的限制因素。患者目前的治疗、PAH的病因、合并症和副作用是影响美国提供者是否愿意使用ERA + PDE5i治疗的关键因素。提供者认为STCT可以帮助HCPs更快地启动ERA + PDE5i,提高依从性,简化前期双治疗的启动和三联治疗的交付。解决成本和保险障碍将是实现这些潜在利益的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonary Circulation
Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信