How to Define a Frequent Caller to the Prehospital Emergency Medical Services? Literature-Based vs. Data-Driven Approach.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Maria Kjærgaard, Astrid Karina Valås Harring, Tine Bennedsen Gehrt
{"title":"How to Define a Frequent Caller to the Prehospital Emergency Medical Services? Literature-Based vs. Data-Driven Approach.","authors":"Maria Kjærgaard, Astrid Karina Valås Harring, Tine Bennedsen Gehrt","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2517863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide and test different definitions of a frequent caller to the prehospital emergency medical services, grounded in both literature and empirical data, in order to spark discussion about definitions and how to make studies on frequent callers more comparable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional register study of emergency calls made to the Emergency Medical Coordination Center (EMCC) covering the Central Denmark Region in 2022. Three definitions were developed: one as the average number of calls derived from definitions in the previous literature, while the other two were determined using a data-driven approach, representing the top 1% and 0.5% most frequent callers. Unadjusted logistic regression was used to measure odds ratios to examine non-causal associations between predictive factors and frequent callers within each definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 65,522 emergency calls concerning 49,623 unique individuals. For this specific population, the definitions resulted in the following three thresholds; literature-based definition: ≥43, top 1%: ≥5, and top 0.5%: ≥8 emergency calls per year. There was great variation between the populations of frequent callers captured by the three definitions. Across definitions, frequent callers constituted a relatively small proportion of the total population contacting the EMCC, while they made a significant share of the calls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest that the 1%-definition is the most suitable for future research on frequent callers to the prehospital EMS as it was able to account for the complexity of this group of citizens and could be applied across prehospital EMS in other contexts and countries. Based on this definition, the most characteristic patterns in emergency calls from frequent callers were low level of urgency, recontact within 24 h, and more calls due to behavioral, psychological, and unclear problems compared to non-frequent callers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2517863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To provide and test different definitions of a frequent caller to the prehospital emergency medical services, grounded in both literature and empirical data, in order to spark discussion about definitions and how to make studies on frequent callers more comparable.

Methods: A cross-sectional register study of emergency calls made to the Emergency Medical Coordination Center (EMCC) covering the Central Denmark Region in 2022. Three definitions were developed: one as the average number of calls derived from definitions in the previous literature, while the other two were determined using a data-driven approach, representing the top 1% and 0.5% most frequent callers. Unadjusted logistic regression was used to measure odds ratios to examine non-causal associations between predictive factors and frequent callers within each definition.

Results: The analysis included 65,522 emergency calls concerning 49,623 unique individuals. For this specific population, the definitions resulted in the following three thresholds; literature-based definition: ≥43, top 1%: ≥5, and top 0.5%: ≥8 emergency calls per year. There was great variation between the populations of frequent callers captured by the three definitions. Across definitions, frequent callers constituted a relatively small proportion of the total population contacting the EMCC, while they made a significant share of the calls.

Conclusions: We suggest that the 1%-definition is the most suitable for future research on frequent callers to the prehospital EMS as it was able to account for the complexity of this group of citizens and could be applied across prehospital EMS in other contexts and countries. Based on this definition, the most characteristic patterns in emergency calls from frequent callers were low level of urgency, recontact within 24 h, and more calls due to behavioral, psychological, and unclear problems compared to non-frequent callers.

如何定义院前急救服务的常客?基于文献vs.数据驱动的方法。
目的:在文献和实证数据的基础上,提供和测试院前紧急医疗服务频繁呼救者的不同定义,以引发对定义的讨论,以及如何使频繁呼救者的研究更具可比性。方法:对2022年丹麦中部地区紧急医疗协调中心(EMCC)的紧急呼叫进行横断面登记研究。开发了三个定义:一个是根据以前文献中的定义派生的平均呼叫次数,而另外两个是使用数据驱动的方法确定的,代表前1%和0.5%最频繁的呼叫者。未经调整的逻辑回归用于测量比值比,以检查每个定义中预测因素与频繁来电者之间的非因果关系。结果:分析包括65,522个紧急呼叫,涉及49,623个独特的个体。对于这一特定人群,定义产生了以下三个阈值;基于文献的定义:≥43次,前1%:≥5次,前0.5%:每年≥8次急诊呼叫。三种定义捕获的频繁呼叫者群体之间存在很大差异。从不同的定义来看,经常打电话的人在联系EMCC的总人口中所占的比例相对较小,但他们拨打的电话却占很大比例。结论:我们认为1%的定义最适合未来对院前急救频繁呼叫者的研究,因为它能够解释这一群体公民的复杂性,并且可以应用于其他背景和国家的院前急救。根据这一定义,频繁呼叫者的紧急呼叫中最典型的模式是紧急程度低、24小时内重新联系、由于行为、心理和不清楚问题而打来的电话比不频繁呼叫者多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信