Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outside High-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Catherine P Cheney, Luderve Rosier, Sarah Cantrell, Nathan M Thielman, Brian A Sullivan
{"title":"Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outside High-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Catherine P Cheney, Luderve Rosier, Sarah Cantrell, Nathan M Thielman, Brian A Sullivan","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Investigate fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for CRC screening outside high-income countries (HIC).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is rising, but optimal screening strategies in resource-limited settings remain unclear. FIT is an evidence-based, low-cost modality for population-based CRC screening. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to better understand the diagnostic performance of FIT for detecting CRC among average-risk individuals living outside HICs.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>A systematic search of studies conducted in LMICs, defined by the World Bank, was conducted on August 8, 2024. Studies were eligible if they assessed FIT as a diagnostic test for CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk participants. Pooled estimates for FIT sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate Bayesian statistical analysis (MetaBayesDTA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search returned 333 distinct studies. Of these, 263 were excluded after title and abstract screening. We reviewed 61 full texts with 7 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2015 and 2022 and included 100,619 participants from Argentina, Brazil, China, Iran, and Thailand. Most used a FIT hemoglobin cutoff of 50 ng/mL (n=4). FIT return rate ranged from 78% to 99%, and positivity ranged from 2.1% to 29%. FIT sensitivity ranged from 55% to 92%, specificity from 71% to 94%, PPV from 2% to 16%, and NPV from 98% to 100%. After meta-analysis, pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity for CRC were 75% (95% CI: 64%-85%) and 89% (95% CI: 77%-95%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT-based CRC screening shows promise, but data was geographically limited to middle-income countries. This highlights the need for research evaluating screening modalities and completion of the screening continuum in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: Investigate fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for CRC screening outside high-income countries (HIC).

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is rising, but optimal screening strategies in resource-limited settings remain unclear. FIT is an evidence-based, low-cost modality for population-based CRC screening. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to better understand the diagnostic performance of FIT for detecting CRC among average-risk individuals living outside HICs.

Study: A systematic search of studies conducted in LMICs, defined by the World Bank, was conducted on August 8, 2024. Studies were eligible if they assessed FIT as a diagnostic test for CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk participants. Pooled estimates for FIT sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate Bayesian statistical analysis (MetaBayesDTA).

Results: Our search returned 333 distinct studies. Of these, 263 were excluded after title and abstract screening. We reviewed 61 full texts with 7 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2015 and 2022 and included 100,619 participants from Argentina, Brazil, China, Iran, and Thailand. Most used a FIT hemoglobin cutoff of 50 ng/mL (n=4). FIT return rate ranged from 78% to 99%, and positivity ranged from 2.1% to 29%. FIT sensitivity ranged from 55% to 92%, specificity from 71% to 94%, PPV from 2% to 16%, and NPV from 98% to 100%. After meta-analysis, pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity for CRC were 75% (95% CI: 64%-85%) and 89% (95% CI: 77%-95%), respectively.

Conclusions: FIT-based CRC screening shows promise, but data was geographically limited to middle-income countries. This highlights the need for research evaluating screening modalities and completion of the screening continuum in LMICs.

粪便免疫化学检测用于高收入国家以外的结直肠癌筛查:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:探讨粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)在高收入国家(HIC)以外的结直肠癌筛查中的应用。背景:低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率正在上升,但在资源有限的情况下,最佳筛查策略仍不清楚。FIT是一种基于证据的低成本人群结直肠癌筛查方式。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以更好地了解FIT在生活在高收入国家以外的平均风险个体中检测结直肠癌的诊断性能。研究:我们于2024年8月8日对世界银行界定的中低收入国家开展的研究进行了系统检索。如果他们评估FIT作为无症状、平均风险参与者的CRC诊断测试,则研究是合格的。使用双变量贝叶斯统计分析(MetaBayesDTA)计算FIT敏感性和特异性的汇总估计。结果:我们的搜索返回了333个不同的研究。其中,263人在经过标题和摘要筛选后被排除。我们审查了61篇全文,其中7篇符合纳入/排除标准。这些研究发表于2015年至2022年之间,包括来自阿根廷、巴西、中国、伊朗和泰国的100,619名参与者。多数采用FIT血红蛋白临界值为50 ng/mL (n=4)。FIT回报率为78% ~ 99%,阳性率为2.1% ~ 29%。FIT敏感性为55% ~ 92%,特异性为71% ~ 94%,PPV为2% ~ 16%,NPV为98% ~ 100%。经过荟萃分析,CRC的敏感性和特异性的汇总估计分别为75% (95% CI: 64%-85%)和89% (95% CI: 77%-95%)。结论:基于fit的CRC筛查显示出希望,但数据在地理上仅限于中等收入国家。这突出了研究评估筛查方式和完成低收入国家筛查连续体的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信