Acute phase reactants in the diagnosis of soft tissue infections of the upper extremity.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
John A Buchan, Andrew Burkhart, Phillip R Ross, Peter J Stern
{"title":"Acute phase reactants in the diagnosis of soft tissue infections of the upper extremity.","authors":"John A Buchan, Andrew Burkhart, Phillip R Ross, Peter J Stern","doi":"10.1186/s12245-025-00905-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper extremity soft tissue infections are commonly encountered in emergency department settings and often require timely interventions. Acute phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell count (WBC), are commonly used in diagnostic workups. However, the utility of these biomarkers in the management of upper extremity infections remains uncertain. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of these acute phase reactants in a broad cohort of patients requiring intervention for upper extremity infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A retrospective review over five years identified 103 patients with upper extremity infections who required incision and drainage. The study found variable sensitivity and reliability of acute phase reactants, particularly for infections distal to the wrist. The average ESR was 42 mm/hr, CRP 64.1 mg/L, and WBC 10.5 × 10³/uL. Of patients with normal acute phase reactants, all had infections located at or distal to the wrist. Notably, patients with culture-negative infections did not exhibit significant differences in laboratory values compared to those with positive cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the limitations of acute phase reactants as diagnostic tools for upper extremity infections, particularly in cases involving infections distal to the wrist. Despite the frequent elevation of these markers in infections requiring surgical intervention, they should not be relied upon as sole determinants of management. A thorough clinical examination and history remain critical in guiding treatment decisions. This study underscores the need for caution when using these biomarkers to rule in or rule out infection in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-00905-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Upper extremity soft tissue infections are commonly encountered in emergency department settings and often require timely interventions. Acute phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell count (WBC), are commonly used in diagnostic workups. However, the utility of these biomarkers in the management of upper extremity infections remains uncertain. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of these acute phase reactants in a broad cohort of patients requiring intervention for upper extremity infections.

Results: A retrospective review over five years identified 103 patients with upper extremity infections who required incision and drainage. The study found variable sensitivity and reliability of acute phase reactants, particularly for infections distal to the wrist. The average ESR was 42 mm/hr, CRP 64.1 mg/L, and WBC 10.5 × 10³/uL. Of patients with normal acute phase reactants, all had infections located at or distal to the wrist. Notably, patients with culture-negative infections did not exhibit significant differences in laboratory values compared to those with positive cultures.

Conclusions: Our study highlights the limitations of acute phase reactants as diagnostic tools for upper extremity infections, particularly in cases involving infections distal to the wrist. Despite the frequent elevation of these markers in infections requiring surgical intervention, they should not be relied upon as sole determinants of management. A thorough clinical examination and history remain critical in guiding treatment decisions. This study underscores the need for caution when using these biomarkers to rule in or rule out infection in the emergency department.

急性期反应物在上肢软组织感染诊断中的应用。
背景:上肢软组织感染常见于急诊科,通常需要及时干预。急性期反应物,如c反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和白细胞计数(WBC),通常用于诊断检查。然而,这些生物标志物在上肢感染管理中的效用仍然不确定。本研究评估了这些急性期反应物在上肢感染需要干预的广泛队列患者中的诊断价值。结果:一项为期5年的回顾性研究确定了103例上肢感染患者,他们需要切开和引流。研究发现急性相反应物的敏感性和可靠性是可变的,特别是对于手腕远端感染。平均ESR为42 mm/hr, CRP为64.1 mg/L, WBC为10.5 × 10³/uL。急性期反应物正常的患者,所有的感染都位于手腕或远端。值得注意的是,培养阴性感染的患者与培养阳性感染的患者相比,实验室值没有显着差异。结论:我们的研究强调了急性相反应物作为上肢感染诊断工具的局限性,特别是在涉及手腕远端感染的病例中。尽管这些标志物在需要手术干预的感染中经常升高,但它们不应作为治疗的唯一决定因素。彻底的临床检查和病史对指导治疗决策仍然至关重要。这项研究强调了在急诊科使用这些生物标志物来排除或排除感染时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信