Radiation safety in catheter ablation: clinical value of real-time operator dosimetry.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Machiko Miyoshi, Kanae Hasegawa, Rikiya Maruyama, Toshiki Tateishi, Ryohei Nomura, Toshihiko Tsuji, Moe Mukai, Tetsuya Tsujikawa, Hiroyasu Uzui, Hiroshi Tada
{"title":"Radiation safety in catheter ablation: clinical value of real-time operator dosimetry.","authors":"Machiko Miyoshi, Kanae Hasegawa, Rikiya Maruyama, Toshiki Tateishi, Ryohei Nomura, Toshihiko Tsuji, Moe Mukai, Tetsuya Tsujikawa, Hiroyasu Uzui, Hiroshi Tada","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02567-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in interventional cardiology have increased procedural complexity, raising concerns about radiation exposure-especially for women operators of reproductive age, who are subject to stricter dose limits. Standard dosimeters provide only delayed cumulative data, limiting timely risk assessment. Real-time personal dosimetry offers immediate feedback, but its clinical utility during catheter ablation (CA) remains underexplored. We retrospectively analyzed 82 CA procedures performed between January and May 2024. First operators wore real-time dosimeters positioned at the waist under lead aprons. Radiation exposure and procedural characteristics were recorded and analyzed. The median operator radiation dose per procedure was 2 [1, 3] µSv, while the median patient dose was 0.163 [0.082, 0.324] Gy. A procedure-related cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis resulted in the highest operator dose (50 µSv). Higher patient BMI (≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and longer fluoroscopy time were independently associated with increased operator exposure (OR: 1.238, P = 0.008; OR: 1.056, P = 0.022), though no linear correlation was observed between BMI and operator dose (r = 0.029, P = 0.797). Radiation exposure to operators during CA is generally low but may increase significantly in the event of complications or with higher-risk patient characteristics. Real-time dosimetry provides valuable immediate feedback and may be especially important for radiation-sensitive operators, supporting safer practice in the evolving field of interventional electrophysiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02567-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in interventional cardiology have increased procedural complexity, raising concerns about radiation exposure-especially for women operators of reproductive age, who are subject to stricter dose limits. Standard dosimeters provide only delayed cumulative data, limiting timely risk assessment. Real-time personal dosimetry offers immediate feedback, but its clinical utility during catheter ablation (CA) remains underexplored. We retrospectively analyzed 82 CA procedures performed between January and May 2024. First operators wore real-time dosimeters positioned at the waist under lead aprons. Radiation exposure and procedural characteristics were recorded and analyzed. The median operator radiation dose per procedure was 2 [1, 3] µSv, while the median patient dose was 0.163 [0.082, 0.324] Gy. A procedure-related cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis resulted in the highest operator dose (50 µSv). Higher patient BMI (≥ 25 kg/m2) and longer fluoroscopy time were independently associated with increased operator exposure (OR: 1.238, P = 0.008; OR: 1.056, P = 0.022), though no linear correlation was observed between BMI and operator dose (r = 0.029, P = 0.797). Radiation exposure to operators during CA is generally low but may increase significantly in the event of complications or with higher-risk patient characteristics. Real-time dosimetry provides valuable immediate feedback and may be especially important for radiation-sensitive operators, supporting safer practice in the evolving field of interventional electrophysiology.

导管消融的放射安全性:实时操作剂量测定的临床价值。
介入心脏病学的进步增加了手术的复杂性,引起了人们对辐射暴露的担忧,尤其是育龄女性手术人员,她们受到更严格的剂量限制。标准剂量计只能提供延迟的累积数据,限制了及时的风险评估。实时个人剂量测定提供即时反馈,但其在导管消融(CA)中的临床应用仍有待探索。我们回顾性分析了2024年1月至5月间进行的82例CA手术。首先,作业人员在腰部的铅围裙下佩戴实时剂量计。记录和分析辐射暴露和程序特征。操作者每次手术的中位辐射剂量为2[1,3]µSv,而患者的中位辐射剂量为0.163 [0.082,0.324]Gy。手术相关的心包填塞需要心包穿刺导致最高的操作剂量(50µSv)。较高的患者BMI(≥25 kg/m2)和较长的透视时间与操作人员暴露增加独立相关(OR: 1.238, P = 0.008;OR: 1.056, P = 0.022),但BMI与操作者剂量之间无线性相关(r = 0.029, P = 0.797)。在CA过程中,操作者的辐射暴露通常较低,但如果出现并发症或具有高危患者特征,则可能显著增加。实时剂量测量提供了有价值的即时反馈,对于辐射敏感的操作人员来说尤其重要,支持在不断发展的介入电生理学领域进行更安全的操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信