Hai-Tao Yang, Jing-Kun Liu, Zhi-Hui Jiang, Yi Yang, Jing Zhang
{"title":"Association of HDL-C levels with all-cause mortality in ACS patients after PCI: a multicenter prospective cohort study.","authors":"Hai-Tao Yang, Jing-Kun Liu, Zhi-Hui Jiang, Yi Yang, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02568-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between HDL-C levels and all-cause mortality in this population. This multicenter prospective cohort study included 17,180 ACS patients who underwent PCI from the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on Acute Coronary Syndrome (MPCS-ACS). HDL-C levels were categorized into four groups: < 30, 30-60, 60-90 (reference), and ≥ 90 mg/dL. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with multivariable adjustments. During a median follow-up of 49 months, 1200 all-cause mortality events occurred. U-shaped associations were observed between HDL-C levels and risks of all-cause mortality. After multivariable adjustment, compared to patients with HDL-C levels of 60-90 mg/dL, ACS patients with HDL-C < 30 mg/dL or ≥ 90 mg/dL had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, with HRs [95% CI] of 3.52 (2.66-4.64) and 2.71 (2.10-3.50), respectively. Both extremely low and high HDL-C levels were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Maintaining HDL-C levels within the 60-90 mg/dL range may be associated with better long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02568-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between HDL-C levels and all-cause mortality in this population. This multicenter prospective cohort study included 17,180 ACS patients who underwent PCI from the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on Acute Coronary Syndrome (MPCS-ACS). HDL-C levels were categorized into four groups: < 30, 30-60, 60-90 (reference), and ≥ 90 mg/dL. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with multivariable adjustments. During a median follow-up of 49 months, 1200 all-cause mortality events occurred. U-shaped associations were observed between HDL-C levels and risks of all-cause mortality. After multivariable adjustment, compared to patients with HDL-C levels of 60-90 mg/dL, ACS patients with HDL-C < 30 mg/dL or ≥ 90 mg/dL had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, with HRs [95% CI] of 3.52 (2.66-4.64) and 2.71 (2.10-3.50), respectively. Both extremely low and high HDL-C levels were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Maintaining HDL-C levels within the 60-90 mg/dL range may be associated with better long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.