Risk Factors for Nonunion Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1: Importance of Bilateral Bicortical Purchase of S1 Pedicle Screws.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Arnold Joseph Cagulada, Jae Hwan Cho, Jekyun Kim, Sehan Park, Chang Ju Hwang, Dong-Ho Lee
{"title":"Risk Factors for Nonunion Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1: Importance of Bilateral Bicortical Purchase of S1 Pedicle Screws.","authors":"Arnold Joseph Cagulada, Jae Hwan Cho, Jekyun Kim, Sehan Park, Chang Ju Hwang, Dong-Ho Lee","doi":"10.1177/21925682251353218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignA retrospective comparative study.ObjectiveThis study explored the factors influencing L5-S1 fusion success following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and identified risk factors for symptomatic nonunion.MethodsThe cohort comprised 134 patients who underwent single- or multiple-level lumbar fusion, including PLIF at L5-S1, due to degenerative spine disease. Radiographic fusion was assessed using 1-year postoperative CT scans. Demographic, clinical (VAS, ODI, and EQ-5D), and radiological data were compared based on fusion status using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients exhibiting nonunion with or without symptoms.ResultsFusion was achieved in 98 (73.1%) out of 134 patients, whereas 36 (26.9%) patients exhibited nonunion at the 1-year follow-up. Factors associated with nonunion included a higher body mass index [BMI; <i>P</i> = .020; 95% confidence interval (CI): .702, .971] and longer fusion levels (<i>P</i> = .032; 95% CI: .345, .952). Bilateral bicortical purchase of S1 pedicle screws significantly improved fusion outcomes (<i>P</i> = .014; 95% CI: 1.281, 9.047). Among the 36 nonunion cases, symptomatic patients showed significantly worse clinical assessment in terms of VAS, ODI, and every domain of EQ-5D. However, radiological parameters exhibited no differences based on the presence of symptoms.ConclusionThe radiological nonunion rate at L5-S1 was 27%. Higher BMI and longer fusion levels were identified as risk factors, whereas bicortical screw placement at S1 emerged as a protective factor against L5-S1 nonunion. Therefore, bilateral anterior cortical purchase of S1 pedicle screws is recommended, particularly in patients undergoing longer fusion procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251353218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251353218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignA retrospective comparative study.ObjectiveThis study explored the factors influencing L5-S1 fusion success following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and identified risk factors for symptomatic nonunion.MethodsThe cohort comprised 134 patients who underwent single- or multiple-level lumbar fusion, including PLIF at L5-S1, due to degenerative spine disease. Radiographic fusion was assessed using 1-year postoperative CT scans. Demographic, clinical (VAS, ODI, and EQ-5D), and radiological data were compared based on fusion status using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients exhibiting nonunion with or without symptoms.ResultsFusion was achieved in 98 (73.1%) out of 134 patients, whereas 36 (26.9%) patients exhibited nonunion at the 1-year follow-up. Factors associated with nonunion included a higher body mass index [BMI; P = .020; 95% confidence interval (CI): .702, .971] and longer fusion levels (P = .032; 95% CI: .345, .952). Bilateral bicortical purchase of S1 pedicle screws significantly improved fusion outcomes (P = .014; 95% CI: 1.281, 9.047). Among the 36 nonunion cases, symptomatic patients showed significantly worse clinical assessment in terms of VAS, ODI, and every domain of EQ-5D. However, radiological parameters exhibited no differences based on the presence of symptoms.ConclusionThe radiological nonunion rate at L5-S1 was 27%. Higher BMI and longer fusion levels were identified as risk factors, whereas bicortical screw placement at S1 emerged as a protective factor against L5-S1 nonunion. Therefore, bilateral anterior cortical purchase of S1 pedicle screws is recommended, particularly in patients undergoing longer fusion procedures.

后路腰椎5-S1椎体间融合术后不愈合的危险因素:双侧双皮质购买S1椎弓根螺钉的重要性。
研究设计:回顾性比较研究。目的探讨后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)后影响L5-S1融合成功的因素,并确定症状性骨不连的危险因素。方法该队列包括134例因脊柱退行性疾病行单节段或多节段腰椎融合术的患者,包括L5-S1的PLIF。术后1年CT扫描评估影像学融合。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析,比较人口统计学、临床(VAS、ODI和EQ-5D)和放射学数据的融合状态。对伴有或无症状的骨不连患者进行亚组分析。结果134例患者中有98例(73.1%)实现融合,而36例(26.9%)患者在1年随访中出现骨不连。与骨不连相关的因素包括较高的身体质量指数(BMI);P = 0.020;95%可信区间(CI): 0.702, 0.971]和更长的融合水平(P = 0.032;95% ci: .345, .952)。双侧双皮质购买S1椎弓根螺钉显著改善融合效果(P = 0.014;95% ci: 1.281, 9.047)。在36例骨不连患者中,有症状的患者在VAS、ODI和EQ-5D各领域的临床评价均明显较差。然而,放射学参数没有表现出基于症状存在的差异。结论L5-S1段放射学不愈合率为27%。较高的BMI和较长的融合水平被认为是危险因素,而在S1处放置双皮质螺钉是防止L5-S1不愈合的保护因素。因此,推荐双侧前皮质购买S1椎弓根螺钉,特别是在接受较长时间融合手术的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信