Agata Suleja, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Angelo Cormio, Marcin Miszczyk, Shahrokh F Shariat
{"title":"Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review.","authors":"Agata Suleja, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Angelo Cormio, Marcin Miszczyk, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to synthesize emerging evidence on the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to chemotherapy alone in 125 MIBC patients demonstrated a significant improvement in 2-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) (96% vs. 69%; P < 0.01). Three studies have evaluated adjuvant RT alone. A single-arm study reported a 5-year local control rate of 79% among 72 patients, with 17% experiencing serious gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 122 patients found improved 3-year LRFS in the RT arm (81% vs. 71% at three years; P = 0.046), with low rate of severe GI AEs (3%); however, the survival difference was not statistically significant. Another RCT with 153 patients showed similar rates of acute severe AEs between RT and observation groups (1.6% vs. 4.2%; P = 0.34). Key limitations across studies include heterogeneity in design, lack of statistical power to detect survival differences, limited patient-reported outcome data, and absence of direct comparisons with immune checkpoint inhibitors - the current standard of care in the adjuvant setting.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Modern adjuvant RT appears to be associated with acceptable toxicity, likely due to improved delivery techniques. Although data suggest a benefit in local-regional control, an overall survival advantage has not been demonstrated. Adjuvant RT may be considered in selected high-risk patients, particularly in settings where access to salvage therapies or immunotherapy is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesize emerging evidence on the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Recent findings: A randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to chemotherapy alone in 125 MIBC patients demonstrated a significant improvement in 2-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) (96% vs. 69%; P < 0.01). Three studies have evaluated adjuvant RT alone. A single-arm study reported a 5-year local control rate of 79% among 72 patients, with 17% experiencing serious gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 122 patients found improved 3-year LRFS in the RT arm (81% vs. 71% at three years; P = 0.046), with low rate of severe GI AEs (3%); however, the survival difference was not statistically significant. Another RCT with 153 patients showed similar rates of acute severe AEs between RT and observation groups (1.6% vs. 4.2%; P = 0.34). Key limitations across studies include heterogeneity in design, lack of statistical power to detect survival differences, limited patient-reported outcome data, and absence of direct comparisons with immune checkpoint inhibitors - the current standard of care in the adjuvant setting.
Summary: Modern adjuvant RT appears to be associated with acceptable toxicity, likely due to improved delivery techniques. Although data suggest a benefit in local-regional control, an overall survival advantage has not been demonstrated. Adjuvant RT may be considered in selected high-risk patients, particularly in settings where access to salvage therapies or immunotherapy is limited.
综述目的:本综述旨在综合有关肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)根治性膀胱切除术(RC)后辅助放疗(RT)作用的新证据。最近的发现:一项随机试验比较了125名MIBC患者的辅助放化疗与单独化疗,结果显示,2年局部无复发生存率(LRFS)显著提高(96% vs 69%;总结:现代辅助放疗似乎与可接受的毒性相关,可能是由于改进的给药技术。虽然数据表明局部-区域控制有好处,但总体生存优势尚未得到证实。选择性高风险患者可考虑辅助RT,特别是在获得挽救性治疗或免疫治疗有限的情况下。
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.