Understanding disparities in access to and quality of surgical care for African, Caribbean and Black communities in high-income countries with universal healthcare: a scoping review protocol.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Linda Bakunda, Dina M Nyjong, Diane Lorenzetti, Oluwatomilayo Daodu, Zack Marshall, Pamela Roach, Khara Sauro
{"title":"Understanding disparities in access to and quality of surgical care for African, Caribbean and Black communities in high-income countries with universal healthcare: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Linda Bakunda, Dina M Nyjong, Diane Lorenzetti, Oluwatomilayo Daodu, Zack Marshall, Pamela Roach, Khara Sauro","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>African, Caribbean and Black (ACB) communities experience disparities in health outcomes, with higher rates of chronic diseases, such as heart disease and stroke, and lower self-reported health status compared to their White counterparts. Barriers to timely access to healthcare services further exacerbate these inequities. Some studies link racialisation to surgical disparities and subpar surgical outcomes. However, the findings are diverse, and there is no synthesis of the evidence on disparities in surgical care for ACB patients in high-income countries with universal healthcare systems. The objective of the scoping review is to systematically describe, characterise and map the existing literature on disparities in the access to and quality of surgical care among ACB patients in high-income countries with universal healthcare systems, and to identify gaps in the literature on surgical access and quality of surgical care in ACB patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and report according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. The search strategy will be customised for each database (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO and Cochrane Library) using terms for ACB and surgery. Grey literature and references from included studies will be searched for additional sources, with no limitations on publication date or language. All study designs will be eligible. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts in duplicate for eligibility. One reviewer will chart data, with a second reviewer validating the data charted. The findings will be synthesised, quantitatively summarised using descriptive statistics and qualitatively analysed through thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethics approval is not required as the study utilises published data. The dissemination of the findings will inform future research and improve understanding of the surgical care experiences of ACB patients. Dissemination will target academics and healthcare professionals through publications, presentations and workshops.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 6","pages":"e099213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: African, Caribbean and Black (ACB) communities experience disparities in health outcomes, with higher rates of chronic diseases, such as heart disease and stroke, and lower self-reported health status compared to their White counterparts. Barriers to timely access to healthcare services further exacerbate these inequities. Some studies link racialisation to surgical disparities and subpar surgical outcomes. However, the findings are diverse, and there is no synthesis of the evidence on disparities in surgical care for ACB patients in high-income countries with universal healthcare systems. The objective of the scoping review is to systematically describe, characterise and map the existing literature on disparities in the access to and quality of surgical care among ACB patients in high-income countries with universal healthcare systems, and to identify gaps in the literature on surgical access and quality of surgical care in ACB patients.

Methods and analysis: The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and report according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. The search strategy will be customised for each database (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO and Cochrane Library) using terms for ACB and surgery. Grey literature and references from included studies will be searched for additional sources, with no limitations on publication date or language. All study designs will be eligible. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts in duplicate for eligibility. One reviewer will chart data, with a second reviewer validating the data charted. The findings will be synthesised, quantitatively summarised using descriptive statistics and qualitatively analysed through thematic analysis.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval is not required as the study utilises published data. The dissemination of the findings will inform future research and improve understanding of the surgical care experiences of ACB patients. Dissemination will target academics and healthcare professionals through publications, presentations and workshops.

了解普及医疗保健的高收入国家中非洲、加勒比和黑人社区外科护理可及性和质量的差异:一项范围审查方案
导言:非洲、加勒比和黑人社区在健康结果方面存在差异,与白人社区相比,他们患心脏病和中风等慢性病的比率较高,自我报告的健康状况较低。阻碍及时获得医疗保健服务的障碍进一步加剧了这些不平等。一些研究将种族化与手术差异和手术效果欠佳联系起来。然而,研究结果是多种多样的,没有综合证据表明,在具有全民医疗保健系统的高收入国家,ACB患者的手术护理存在差异。范围审查的目的是系统地描述、描述和绘制关于高收入国家普遍医疗保健系统中ACB患者手术治疗可及性和质量差异的现有文献,并确定ACB患者手术可及性和手术治疗质量的文献差距。方法和分析:范围审查将遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法,并根据范围审查清单的系统审查和元分析扩展的首选报告项目进行报告。搜索策略将为每个数据库(MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO和Cochrane Library)定制,使用ACB和外科术语。灰色文献和纳入研究的参考文献将被搜索其他来源,不受出版日期或语言的限制。所有的研究设计都是合格的。两名独立审稿人将对标题、摘要和全文一式两份进行筛选。一个审稿人将绘制数据图表,另一个审稿人将验证绘制的数据。将对调查结果进行综合,利用描述性统计进行数量总结,并通过专题分析进行质量分析。伦理与传播:由于本研究使用的是已发表的数据,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果的传播将为未来的研究提供信息,并提高对ACB患者手术护理经验的理解。将通过出版物、演讲和讲习班向学术界和保健专业人员进行宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信