Comparison of topical and intravenous tranexamic acid for reducing postoperative blood loss in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study from Japan.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kazuma Kitaguchi, Kunihiko Hashimoto, Takashi Kaito, Kazuya Oshima, Eiji Wada
{"title":"Comparison of topical and intravenous tranexamic acid for reducing postoperative blood loss in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study from Japan.","authors":"Kazuma Kitaguchi, Kunihiko Hashimoto, Takashi Kaito, Kazuya Oshima, Eiji Wada","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical and relatively high-dose intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) in minimizing postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Topical TXA demonstrates a similar hemostatic efficacy to intravenous TXA. However, whether intravenous or topical TXA is more effective in minimizing postoperative bleeding in spine surgery remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 140 patients who underwent single-level PLIF were retrospectively enrolled and assigned to the (1) control group (n=58), which did not receive TXA; (2) TXA (iv) group (n=39), which was administered intravenously with a relatively high-dose (2 g) of TXA immediately before wound closure; and (3) TXA (t) group (n=43), which received topical application of TXA (1 g in 100 mL of saline solution) to the wound immediately before wound closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in age, body mass index, sex, preoperative hematological parameters, or intraoperative blood loss were found among the three groups. The total postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the TXA (t) group than in the TXA (iv) and control groups (389.6±137.5 vs. 543.6±175.4 vs. 700.3±231.4, respectively; both p<0.01). Analysis of blood loss over time revealed significantly less blood loss throughout the postoperative period in the TXA (t) group than in the control group (p<0.01). In contrast, the TXA (iv) group showed less blood loss than the control group in 2-6 hours and 6-12 hours postoperatively (p<0.05). No complications, such as thromboembolic events, were associated with the use of either TXA formulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following single-level PLIF, topical TXA exerts rapid and long-lasting effects on minimizing postoperative blood loss compared with twice the amount of intravenous TXA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical and relatively high-dose intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) in minimizing postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

Overview of literature: Topical TXA demonstrates a similar hemostatic efficacy to intravenous TXA. However, whether intravenous or topical TXA is more effective in minimizing postoperative bleeding in spine surgery remains unclear.

Methods: In total, 140 patients who underwent single-level PLIF were retrospectively enrolled and assigned to the (1) control group (n=58), which did not receive TXA; (2) TXA (iv) group (n=39), which was administered intravenously with a relatively high-dose (2 g) of TXA immediately before wound closure; and (3) TXA (t) group (n=43), which received topical application of TXA (1 g in 100 mL of saline solution) to the wound immediately before wound closure.

Results: No significant differences in age, body mass index, sex, preoperative hematological parameters, or intraoperative blood loss were found among the three groups. The total postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the TXA (t) group than in the TXA (iv) and control groups (389.6±137.5 vs. 543.6±175.4 vs. 700.3±231.4, respectively; both p<0.01). Analysis of blood loss over time revealed significantly less blood loss throughout the postoperative period in the TXA (t) group than in the control group (p<0.01). In contrast, the TXA (iv) group showed less blood loss than the control group in 2-6 hours and 6-12 hours postoperatively (p<0.05). No complications, such as thromboembolic events, were associated with the use of either TXA formulation.

Conclusions: Following single-level PLIF, topical TXA exerts rapid and long-lasting effects on minimizing postoperative blood loss compared with twice the amount of intravenous TXA.

外用和静脉注射氨甲环酸减少单节段后腰椎椎体间融合术后出血量的比较:来自日本的回顾性研究。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:本研究旨在比较局部和相对大剂量静脉注射氨甲环酸(TXA)在减少单节段后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)患者术后出血量方面的疗效和安全性。文献综述:局部TXA显示出与静脉注射TXA相似的止血效果。然而,静脉注射或外用TXA在减少脊柱手术术后出血方面是否更有效尚不清楚。方法:共有140例接受单水平PLIF的患者被回顾性纳入,并被分配到(1)对照组(n=58),不接受TXA;(2) TXA (iv)组(n=39),创口闭合前立即静脉给予较高剂量(2 g) TXA;(3) TXA (t)组(n=43),创面闭合前立即局部涂抹TXA (1 g, 100ml生理盐水溶液)。结果:三组患者在年龄、体重指数、性别、术前血液学指标、术中出血量等方面均无显著差异。TXA (t)组术后总出血量明显低于TXA (iv)组和对照组(389.6±137.5 vs. 543.6±175.4 vs. 7000.3±231.4);结论:与两倍量的静脉注射TXA相比,单剂量PLIF后,局部TXA对减少术后出血量具有快速和持久的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信