Shantel Chang, Madeleen van der Merwe, Ammar Zaka, Aashray Gupta, Cheng He, Andrie Stroebel
{"title":"An Evaluation of Four Predictive Scores for New Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery in a Tertiary Cardiac Centre.","authors":"Shantel Chang, Madeleen van der Merwe, Ammar Zaka, Aashray Gupta, Cheng He, Andrie Stroebel","doi":"10.1111/ans.70229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery, leading to increased mortality, morbidity, and length of stay. Various predictive indices have been validated to identify patients at risk of developing POAF. This study aimed to compare the discriminative ability of four bedside indices that predict POAF in cardiac surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 2465 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery at an Australian tertiary hospital between 29 December 2015, and 31 December 2022, were retrospectively analysed. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing atrial fibrillation and transcatheter interventions. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) analysis and Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration were performed to compare discriminative abilities. A logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate independent risk factors for developing POAF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older patients (aged > 69) were more likely to develop POAF compared to younger age groups (p < 0.001). The Atrial Fibrillation Risk Index, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASC, HATCH and POAF scores had weak discrimination and demonstrated poor predictive ability in this cohort (AUC-ROC 0.49, 0.49, 0.50, 0.52, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although previously validated in various cohorts, the four bedside predictive indices demonstrated poor discriminative ability and limited generalizability to our tertiary-hospital cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery, leading to increased mortality, morbidity, and length of stay. Various predictive indices have been validated to identify patients at risk of developing POAF. This study aimed to compare the discriminative ability of four bedside indices that predict POAF in cardiac surgical patients.
Method: A total of 2465 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery at an Australian tertiary hospital between 29 December 2015, and 31 December 2022, were retrospectively analysed. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing atrial fibrillation and transcatheter interventions. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) analysis and Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration were performed to compare discriminative abilities. A logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate independent risk factors for developing POAF.
Results: Older patients (aged > 69) were more likely to develop POAF compared to younger age groups (p < 0.001). The Atrial Fibrillation Risk Index, CHA2DS2-VASC, HATCH and POAF scores had weak discrimination and demonstrated poor predictive ability in this cohort (AUC-ROC 0.49, 0.49, 0.50, 0.52, respectively).
Conclusion: Although previously validated in various cohorts, the four bedside predictive indices demonstrated poor discriminative ability and limited generalizability to our tertiary-hospital cohort.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.