Rafael Andrade Sampaio Silva, André Nishizima, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Eduardo Louly Santos Dallastra, Axel Ravanello, Antomir Santos Pereira, Milena Gonçalves Guerreiro, Bernardo Bastian Pinto
{"title":"Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Applied Immediately After Wound Closure on Scars Quality Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Rafael Andrade Sampaio Silva, André Nishizima, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Eduardo Louly Santos Dallastra, Axel Ravanello, Antomir Santos Pereira, Milena Gonçalves Guerreiro, Bernardo Bastian Pinto","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Botulinum toxin (BTX) is considered an efficient and safe therapy for postoperative scars that improves visual and functional quality. However, the optimal timing for injection remains under debate due to conflicting evidence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BTX applied immediately after wound closure in the quality assessment of postoperative scars.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane until September 10, 2024, including randomized or prospective studies on BTX applied immediately after wound closure, with exclusions for keloids or hypertrophic scars treatment studies, non-English studies, reviews, case reports, letters, and abstracts. The quality of scars was assessed using appropriate and widely validated tests and scales when at least 3 studies selected in the meta-analysis utilized them. The mean difference (MD) was used to explore the difference among different groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine randomized trials and 1 prospective study in a total of 521 were identified in this meta-analysis. BTX showed no significant difference in Vancouver Scar Scale score (MD = -0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.01 to 0.30, P = 0.29) compared with control, higher visual analog scale score (MD = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.68 to 1.90, P < 0.01), and reduced scar width (MD = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.09, P < 0.01). No adverse events were found in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated that BTX injections immediately after wound closure are safe and improve scars quality. BTX time of injection requires further studies to provide better clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"212-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Botulinum toxin (BTX) is considered an efficient and safe therapy for postoperative scars that improves visual and functional quality. However, the optimal timing for injection remains under debate due to conflicting evidence.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BTX applied immediately after wound closure in the quality assessment of postoperative scars.
Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane until September 10, 2024, including randomized or prospective studies on BTX applied immediately after wound closure, with exclusions for keloids or hypertrophic scars treatment studies, non-English studies, reviews, case reports, letters, and abstracts. The quality of scars was assessed using appropriate and widely validated tests and scales when at least 3 studies selected in the meta-analysis utilized them. The mean difference (MD) was used to explore the difference among different groups.
Results: Nine randomized trials and 1 prospective study in a total of 521 were identified in this meta-analysis. BTX showed no significant difference in Vancouver Scar Scale score (MD = -0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.01 to 0.30, P = 0.29) compared with control, higher visual analog scale score (MD = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.68 to 1.90, P < 0.01), and reduced scar width (MD = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.09, P < 0.01). No adverse events were found in the included studies.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that BTX injections immediately after wound closure are safe and improve scars quality. BTX time of injection requires further studies to provide better clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.