Prognosis of Nonagenarian ICU Patients A Bayesian analysis of prospective European studies.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Daniel Dankl, Raphael Romano Bruno, Michael Beil, Hans Flaatten, Malte Kelm, Sviri Sigal, Wojciech Szczeklik, Muhammed Elhadi, Michael Joannidis, Andreas Koköfer, Barbara Schreiber, Franz Singhartinger, Sandra Oeyen, Brian Marsh, Rui Moreno, Susannah Leaver, Dylan W De Lange, Bertrand Guidet, Ariane Boumendil, Christian Jung, Bernhard Wernly
{"title":"Prognosis of Nonagenarian ICU Patients A Bayesian analysis of prospective European studies.","authors":"Daniel Dankl, Raphael Romano Bruno, Michael Beil, Hans Flaatten, Malte Kelm, Sviri Sigal, Wojciech Szczeklik, Muhammed Elhadi, Michael Joannidis, Andreas Koköfer, Barbara Schreiber, Franz Singhartinger, Sandra Oeyen, Brian Marsh, Rui Moreno, Susannah Leaver, Dylan W De Lange, Bertrand Guidet, Ariane Boumendil, Christian Jung, Bernhard Wernly","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01496-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the population ages, the number of very elderly patients (≥ 90 years, nonagenarians) admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is increasing. This trend raises concerns about the appropriateness of ICU care for this age group, especially due to the uncertainty surrounding their prognosis. Some studies suggest that elderly ICU patients have outcomes similar to slightly younger patients, but skepticism remains due to clinical judgment, cultural attitudes, and resource allocation concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reassessed the 30-day mortality risk of nonagenarians admitted to ICUs using data from the VIP1, VIP2, and COVIP registries. Bayesian statistical methods, including Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations, were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of mortality for nonagenarians compared to octogenarians (80-89 years). Various prior assumptions (non-informative, pessimistic, and skeptical) were incorporated. The analysis adjusted for key variables such as SOFA score, frailty, and treatment limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8,408 patients were included, consisting of 807 nonagenarians and 7,601 octogenarians. The 30-day mortality rate was 45% for nonagenarians and 42% for octogenarians (p = 0.12). Bayesian analysis revealed a high probability (81.1-97.9%) that nonagenarians face a higher 30-day mortality risk. However, the probability of a clinically significantly increase in mortality (RR > 1.1) was moderate (28.9-34.7%), and the probability of a substantial increase (RR > 1.2) was very low (0.03-1.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nonagenarians in the ICU have a slightly higher 30-day mortality risk compared to octogenarians, but the increase is unlikely to exceed clinically meaningful thresholds. Bayesian methods offer more refined mortality risk assessment, suggesting that ICU admission decisions should be based on individualized factors, not just age.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01496-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the population ages, the number of very elderly patients (≥ 90 years, nonagenarians) admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is increasing. This trend raises concerns about the appropriateness of ICU care for this age group, especially due to the uncertainty surrounding their prognosis. Some studies suggest that elderly ICU patients have outcomes similar to slightly younger patients, but skepticism remains due to clinical judgment, cultural attitudes, and resource allocation concerns.

Methods: We reassessed the 30-day mortality risk of nonagenarians admitted to ICUs using data from the VIP1, VIP2, and COVIP registries. Bayesian statistical methods, including Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations, were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of mortality for nonagenarians compared to octogenarians (80-89 years). Various prior assumptions (non-informative, pessimistic, and skeptical) were incorporated. The analysis adjusted for key variables such as SOFA score, frailty, and treatment limitations.

Results: A total of 8,408 patients were included, consisting of 807 nonagenarians and 7,601 octogenarians. The 30-day mortality rate was 45% for nonagenarians and 42% for octogenarians (p = 0.12). Bayesian analysis revealed a high probability (81.1-97.9%) that nonagenarians face a higher 30-day mortality risk. However, the probability of a clinically significantly increase in mortality (RR > 1.1) was moderate (28.9-34.7%), and the probability of a substantial increase (RR > 1.2) was very low (0.03-1.9%).

Conclusion: Nonagenarians in the ICU have a slightly higher 30-day mortality risk compared to octogenarians, but the increase is unlikely to exceed clinically meaningful thresholds. Bayesian methods offer more refined mortality risk assessment, suggesting that ICU admission decisions should be based on individualized factors, not just age.

欧洲前瞻性研究的贝叶斯分析:高龄ICU患者的预后
背景:随着人口老龄化,入住重症监护病房(icu)的高龄患者(≥90岁,90岁以上)数量不断增加。这一趋势引起了对该年龄组ICU护理是否适当的关注,特别是由于其预后的不确定性。一些研究表明老年ICU患者的预后与稍年轻的患者相似,但由于临床判断、文化态度和资源分配问题,怀疑仍然存在。方法:我们使用VIP1、VIP2和COVIP登记处的数据重新评估入住icu的90岁老人的30天死亡风险。采用贝叶斯统计方法,包括马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)模拟,估计了九十岁以上老人与八十岁以上老人(80-89岁)的相对死亡风险(RR)。各种先前的假设(无信息的、悲观的和怀疑的)被纳入。分析调整了关键变量,如SOFA评分、虚弱和治疗限制。结果:共纳入8408例患者,其中老年患者807例,老年患者7601例。90岁老人30天死亡率为45%,80岁老人为42% (p = 0.12)。贝叶斯分析显示,90多岁老人面临更高的30天死亡风险的概率很高(81.1-97.9%)。然而,临床显著增加死亡率(RR > 1.1)的概率中等(28.9-34.7%),显著增加死亡率(RR > 1.2)的概率非常低(0.03-1.9%)。结论:与80岁老人相比,ICU的90岁老人30天死亡风险略高,但增幅不太可能超过临床有意义的阈值。贝叶斯方法提供了更精确的死亡风险评估,表明ICU的入院决定应基于个性化因素,而不仅仅是年龄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信