Dual forced-air warming improves intra-operative temperature management in lumbar spine surgeries

IF 1.4 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hsin-Yi Wang , Yu-Cheng Yao , Po-Hsin Chou , Chien-Kun Ting , Jing-Yang Liou
{"title":"Dual forced-air warming improves intra-operative temperature management in lumbar spine surgeries","authors":"Hsin-Yi Wang ,&nbsp;Yu-Cheng Yao ,&nbsp;Po-Hsin Chou ,&nbsp;Chien-Kun Ting ,&nbsp;Jing-Yang Liou","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The efficacy of dual versus single forced-air warming (FAW) devices in lumbar spine surgeries has not been evaluated. We hypothesized that dual FAW devices can rewarm the patient faster, which results in better intra-operative temperature management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Propensity score matching of two cohorts was performed. The FAW1 group received standard anesthetic care with the single FAW device and the FAW2 group used dual FAW devices. The time–temperature integral was calculated to evaluate the temperature exposure. The primary outcomes included intra-operative minimal temperature, final temperature and the integral of the hypothermic and rewarm periods (to 36 °C). The risk factors were analyzed as secondary outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The FAW1 and FAW2 groups showed similar average lowest temperature. However, the time–temperature integral in the FAW2 group was significantly lower than that in the FAW1 group. The FAW2 group had a faster average rewarming time than the FAW1 group by 51.7 min. The FAW2 group had a higher number of patients achieving normothermia at the end of surgery than the FAW1 group (87.7 % vs. 60 %). Blood loss was associated with hypothermia in the FAW1 group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dual FAW devices are beneficial for intra-operative temperature management in lumbar spine surgeries. Further, they can be easily implemented. Patients who used dual FAW devices had a less exposure to mild hypothermia (&lt;35 °C) and a faster rewarming time to &gt;36 °C. Hence, there was a higher proportion of patients with normothermia at the end of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial number</h3><div>not applicable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844025000565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The efficacy of dual versus single forced-air warming (FAW) devices in lumbar spine surgeries has not been evaluated. We hypothesized that dual FAW devices can rewarm the patient faster, which results in better intra-operative temperature management.

Methods

Propensity score matching of two cohorts was performed. The FAW1 group received standard anesthetic care with the single FAW device and the FAW2 group used dual FAW devices. The time–temperature integral was calculated to evaluate the temperature exposure. The primary outcomes included intra-operative minimal temperature, final temperature and the integral of the hypothermic and rewarm periods (to 36 °C). The risk factors were analyzed as secondary outcomes.

Results

The FAW1 and FAW2 groups showed similar average lowest temperature. However, the time–temperature integral in the FAW2 group was significantly lower than that in the FAW1 group. The FAW2 group had a faster average rewarming time than the FAW1 group by 51.7 min. The FAW2 group had a higher number of patients achieving normothermia at the end of surgery than the FAW1 group (87.7 % vs. 60 %). Blood loss was associated with hypothermia in the FAW1 group.

Conclusions

Dual FAW devices are beneficial for intra-operative temperature management in lumbar spine surgeries. Further, they can be easily implemented. Patients who used dual FAW devices had a less exposure to mild hypothermia (<35 °C) and a faster rewarming time to >36 °C. Hence, there was a higher proportion of patients with normothermia at the end of surgery.

Clinical trial number

not applicable.
双重强制空气加热改善腰椎手术中的术中温度管理
目的:在腰椎手术中,双空气加热装置与单空气加热装置的效果尚未得到评价。我们假设双FAW装置可以更快地为患者重新加热,从而更好地进行术中温度管理。方法对两组患者进行倾向评分匹配。fa1组采用单台FAW装置,fa2组采用双台FAW装置。计算时间-温度积分来评估温度暴露。主要结果包括术中最低温度、最终温度以及低温和再温时间的积分(至36°C)。将危险因素作为次要结局进行分析。结果fa1组和fa2组的平均最低温度相似。然而,时间-温度积分在fa2组显著低于fa1组。fa2组的平均复温时间比fa1组快51.7分钟。fa2组在手术结束时达到正常体温的患者人数高于fa1组(87.7%比60%)。在FAW1组中,失血与体温过低有关。结论双FAW装置有利于腰椎手术术中温度管理。此外,它们可以很容易地实现。使用双FAW装置的患者接触轻度低温(35°C)的时间更少,恢复到36°C的时间更快。因此,手术结束时出现正常体温的患者比例较高。临床试验编号不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信